The US on Tuesday approved a US$100 million sale of arms and related services to Taiwan.
The package, which is expected to be formally confirmed by the US Congress next month, includes the “services support, designed to sustain, maintain, and improve” Taiwan’s Patriot missile systems, the US Defense Security Cooperation Agency said in a statement.
Such missile systems are of growing importance to Taiwan’s defenses in the face of increasing Chinese incursions into the nation’s air defense identification zone, and the Ministry of National Defense should station more launch vehicles for Patriots and other missile systems on the Pratas Islands (Dongsha Islands, 東沙群島), as they are closest to the sites of the incursions.
The ministry should also speed up production of indigenous Ta Chiang-class corvettes, and outfit them with surface-to-air missile systems to patrol the waters near the Pratas Islands. This could take some pressure off the air force, which is strained by intercepting the incursions.
These interceptions also hamper training, as more experienced pilots are usually dispatched to fly the missions, the Central News Agency reported on Wednesday last week.
Pilot error is the most common reason for crashes involving Taiwanese jet fighters, and more training would be needed to prevent fatal incidents such as that which took the life of air force pilot Chen Yi (陳奕) on Jan. 11, the report said.
Institute for National Defense and Security Research senior researcher Su Tzu-yun (蘇紫雲) in March last year suggested that the military use armed drones — such as the MQ-9, equipped with AIM-9 missiles — for defensive air patrols.
The Chungshan Institute of Science and Technology has also developed drones, and the ministry in December last year said it expects to next month strike a deal to procure US-made MQ-9 Reaper drones.
The ministry could station such long-range, heavy-duty drones on the Pratas Islands and Itu Aba Island (Taiping Island, 太平島) in the South China Sea, Pengjia Islet (彭佳嶼) off northern Taiwan proper, and Kinmen, Lienchang and Penghu counties. Coupled with radar and automated defense systems, stationing the drones would contribute to turning Taiwan into a “porcupine island,” while taking pressure off the air force.
Drones could also help defend against China’s electronic warfare, such as when it dispatches J-16D fighters, as Beijing did in its latest incursion. The ministry could also use drones for intelligence gathering in the South China Sea and along the Chinese coast, and share its findings with the US and Japan. Ultimately, Taiwan needs to coordinate with friendly nations in the event of a Chinese attack, as networking and information sharing would be in the best interest of the parties involved.
National Policy Foundation researcher Chieh Chung (揭仲) on Jan. 24 said that a large Chinese incursion the day before was meant to send a message to Tokyo and Washington. It is evidence that Beijing recognizes the US and Japan’s shared interest with regard to defending Taiwan.
A strong show of unity between the three countries, as well as Australia, would cause Beijing to think twice before acting aggressively in the Taiwan Strait.
The pressure that Chinese incursions put on the air force shows that Taiwan should focus more on automated defense systems, as well as cooperation with like-minded partners, including intelligence sharing and joint drills, which would be a strong deterrent against Chinese aggression.
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) held a news conference to celebrate his party’s success in surviving Saturday’s mass recall vote, shortly after the final results were confirmed. While the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) would have much preferred a different result, it was not a defeat for the DPP in the same sense that it was a victory for the KMT: Only KMT legislators were facing recalls. That alone should have given Chu cause to reflect, acknowledge any fault, or perhaps even consider apologizing to his party and the nation. However, based on his speech, Chu showed
For nearly eight decades, Taiwan has provided a home for, and shielded and nurtured, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). After losing the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the KMT fled to Taiwan, bringing with it hundreds of thousands of soldiers, along with people who would go on to become public servants and educators. The party settled and prospered in Taiwan, and it developed and governed the nation. Taiwan gave the party a second chance. It was Taiwanese who rebuilt order from the ruins of war, through their own sweat and tears. It was Taiwanese who joined forces with democratic activists
RSS