Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison’s WeChat account, which was opened in 2019 for direct communication with Chinese-Australians prior to an election, was hijacked in October last year, with the account name changed from ScottMorrison2019 to Aus-Chinese New Living, and began posting pro-China political propaganda.
Since as early as July last year, Morrison and his assistants have been unable to log in to the account. Repeated attempts to contact WeChat owner Tencent Holdings Ltd to retrieve the account were unsuccessful, with all e-mails going unanswered.
However, the account of an Australian lawmaker who recently criticized Morrison for “spreading lies” about a pathogen test was not affected.
Australian experts have criticized the Chinese government for blatantly imposing censorship outside of China and interfering with Australia’s democratic system.
It has long been known that China uses applications to publish disinformation and collect personal data, and even the official app of the Beijing Winter Olympics has security concerns. WeChat has also been a source of disinformation and China’s tool to spy on and manipulate people overseas.
That even the accounts of foreign heads of state can be manipulated speaks of a special kind of arrogance, in which Australia was effectively being treated as a vassal state.
This not only disregards diplomatic etiquette and the international order, it also proves once again that China has absolute control over all Chinese companies, especially the digital technology industry, and that Chinese are not the only ones being monitored.
It was revealed on Jan. 13 that alleged Chinese agent Christine Lee (李貞駒) “knowingly engaged in political interference activities” inside the British parliament.
These examples show that China’s infiltration tactics have become multidimensional, penetrating every aspect of the world in different ways, allowing China to export its influence abroad.
Not only WeChat, but other Chinese apps such as TikTok, Xiaohongshu (also known as Little Red Book) and iQIYI have penetrated the Taiwanese market, attracting large numbers of users. The iQIYI platform has the third-largest market share of all over-the-top media services, even after having been banned in Taiwan.
This shows that Taiwan not only has insufficient legal and regulatory resistance against such infiltration, but the apps’ users do not mind being bugged and having their personal data stolen. This is the primary concern.
The invasion of these Chinese apps not only breaches Taiwan’s national defense, it also harms Taiwanese industries. Chinese groups with considerable capital can expand their businesses quickly in Taiwan through puppet organizations, marginalizing local competitors, stifling local businesses and monopolizing the market.
This pattern is replicated across many industries. As interest groups become powerful, and political and business relationships become entangled, China could eventually become able to annex Taiwan without sending a single soldier.
In addition to votes, banknotes can also be used to defend sovereignty, to counter infiltration and to revitalize local industries. Everyone can do their bit to help stop China’s bad money from driving out Taiwan’s good.
Hong Tsun-ming is director of the Taiwan Statebuilding Party’s Yilan County branch.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS