When the international situation was unfavorable to Taiwan, any attempt to fight for its sovereignty was seen as “causing trouble.” This discouraged the government and Taiwanese, and is one of the reasons the three previous presidents shortened mandatory military service and moved toward an all-volunteer military.
The international environment has completely changed. The US’ efforts to build alliances against China have put Taiwan in a central strategic position.
In June last year, several members of the US Senate and House of Representatives reintroduced a “Taiwan defense act.” In November, US Senator Josh Hawley introduced an “arm Taiwan act,” and on Friday last week US Representative Mike Gallagher proposed the same bill in the House. Last month, the US Congress passed the National Defense Authorization Act, which includes numerous provisions for boosting Taiwan’s defenses.
It is not just the US showing support. Australia, the EU, India, Japan and the UK have all started resisting China. Whenever China makes military threats, Taiwan’s friends around the world ask how they can help. In May last year, the Economist called Taiwan the “most dangerous place on Earth,” but most Taiwanese are blissfully unaware of it.
In an interview with CommonWealth Magazine earlier this month, US political scientist Francis Fukuyama said: “I do not believe Taiwan has taken its own self-defense seriously enough,” adding that the “biggest mistake Taiwan has made was to abolish mandatory military service.”
Fukuyama’s comments echo the US political, military and intelligence communities’ repeated calls for Taiwan to demonstrate its will to defend itself.
Taiwanese hope that as soon as they face a threat of war, someone will come to their rescue, but for someone to save them, the nation must first be willing to save itself. Having military conscription would be a clear way to show its determination. Otherwise, why would other countries get involved?
Taiwan’s low birthrate makes it impossible to enroll enough soldiers through voluntary recruitment. It is also impossible to develop a national defense strategy if people have never served in the military, or if the length of their service was as short as a summer camp, leaving trainees without basic military knowledge.
To secure enough soldiers for Taiwan’s military needs, men and women should do military service, which would uphold equal rights for men and women, while encouraging female empowerment.
The length of compulsory service should also be reconsidered. It is only four months, which is not enough for conscripts to even master basic skills, let alone prepare for combat.
More specialized kinds of soldiers, from artillery gunners on up, need at least one year of training to gain basic combat skills. The length of service should therefore revert to two years, and three years for more specialized personnel.
Many opponents of conscription say that military training is so poor these days that being a soldier is a waste of time. To say so is like refusing to eat because you once had an upset stomach. If the food tastes a bit off, clean up the kitchen, do not go on a hunger strike.
Yes, Taiwan’s armed forces are in need of reform, but the government should strive to innovate, not look for excuses to do nothing.
Taiwan should heed Fukuyama’s advice. The only way to ensure peace is to be prepared for war, so the nation must bring back conscription.
Tommy Lin is a physician and president of the Formosa Republican Association.
Translated by Julian Clegg
President William Lai (賴清德) attended a dinner held by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) when representatives from the group visited Taiwan in October. In a speech at the event, Lai highlighted similarities in the geopolitical challenges faced by Israel and Taiwan, saying that the two countries “stand on the front line against authoritarianism.” Lai noted how Taiwan had “immediately condemned” the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas and had provided humanitarian aid. Lai was heavily criticized from some quarters for standing with AIPAC and Israel. On Nov. 4, the Taipei Times published an opinion article (“Speak out on the
The image was oddly quiet. No speeches, no flags, no dramatic announcements — just a Chinese cargo ship cutting through arctic ice and arriving in Britain in October. The Istanbul Bridge completed a journey that once existed only in theory, shaving weeks off traditional shipping routes. On paper, it was a story about efficiency. In strategic terms, it was about timing. Much like politics, arriving early matters. Especially when the route, the rules and the traffic are still undefined. For years, global politics has trained us to watch the loud moments: warships in the Taiwan Strait, sanctions announced at news conferences, leaders trading
Eighty-seven percent of Taiwan’s energy supply this year came from burning fossil fuels, with more than 47 percent of that from gas-fired power generation. The figures attracted international attention since they were in October published in a Reuters report, which highlighted the fragility and structural challenges of Taiwan’s energy sector, accumulated through long-standing policy choices. The nation’s overreliance on natural gas is proving unstable and inadequate. The rising use of natural gas does not project an image of a Taiwan committed to a green energy transition; rather, it seems that Taiwan is attempting to patch up structural gaps in lieu of
News about expanding security cooperation between Israel and Taiwan, including the visits of Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) in September and Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Francois Wu (吳志中) this month, as well as growing ties in areas such as missile defense and cybersecurity, should not be viewed as isolated events. The emphasis on missile defense, including Taiwan’s newly introduced T-Dome project, is simply the most visible sign of a deeper trend that has been taking shape quietly over the past two to three years. Taipei is seeking to expand security and defense cooperation with Israel, something officials