The State Bank of India has raised US$300 million from the Taiwanese market through a maiden issue of Formosa bonds at a coupon rate of 2.49 percent. The issuance attracted a wide range of investors, such as supranational agencies, asset managers, private bankers and financial institutions. Meanwhile, the Indian government has also started talks with Taiwan on a free-trade agreement.
These developments would normally have been treated as a routine affair between India and Taiwan, but as the countries do not enjoy formal ties, and India has in the past remained hesitant to sign a free-trade agreement with Taiwan, the activities underscore a profound shift in New Delhi’s policy toward Taipei. More to the point, the successive governments before Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi tried to foster ties with Taiwan in a closet due to their fear of China.
Now, India has taken several bold initiatives to openly acknowledge its ties with Taiwan. One such decision was of course to invite Taiwan’s ambassador to Modi’s swearing-in ceremony. Taiwan’s de facto embassy in New Delhi has also been given more public space.
The Indian political leadership’s new approach toward Taiwan has inadvertently encouraged Indian print and electronic media to focus on the relationship between the nations.
Moreover, there is a strong opinion among Indian experts, former diplomats and the general public that India should take initiatives to consolidate and improve ties with Taiwan.
This is a silver lining, because one of the challenges that the two sides continue to face is a lack of public awareness about each other.
The nations have also taken steps to foster cooperation in education and research. For example, the Ministry of Science and Technology and the Indian Council of Social Sciences signed an agreement enabling researchers of the two countries to work together on major projects of bilateral benefit.
It is not a coincidence that India has inched toward enhancing ties with Taiwan. There are several factors responsible for the change in public and political perception about Taiwan. China is of course a major common factor for the two countries.
While New Delhi and Taipei are facing major security threats from the Chinese communist regime, this is the first time that Taiwan, under President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) leadership, and India, under Modi’s, have strongly positioned themselves against China, and have shown the desire to move beyond the shadow of Beijing in expanding their bilateral cooperation. While Taiwan has assumed a place in India’s Act East Policy, the Tsai government attaches huge importance to India in its New Southbound Policy.
It is also a hard truth that except for some political, economic and education initiatives, India has not made an effort to institutionalize the relationship. In turn, the nations’ ties suffer from inconsistency and unpredictability.
Learning from the US and even Lithuania, India should attempt to build political relations at some level. This would not only infuse trust in the relationship, but would also bolster Taiwan’s image as a flourishing democracy in Asia. India helping Taiwan would enhance New Delhi’s status among Asian nations and other countries.
India should also consider institutionalizing cooperation in several areas of common interest. One such area is bilateral trade and commerce.
While India and Taiwan view economic ties as the linchpin of their cooperation, the volume of bilateral trade has only marginally increased from US$6.4 billion in 2011 to US$7.5 billion in 2019. This underscores the need for the two sides to make serious efforts to realize the full potential of economic cooperation.
With Taiwan and India desperately trying to reduce their bilateral trade and commerce with China, the two countries can prove to be beneficial for each other in several ways. For example, between April 2019 and February 2020, imports from China were 1.42 trillion rupees (US$19.04 billion) or 40 percent of India’s total imports of electronics.
As a major exporter of electronics, including semiconductors, Taiwan holds huge importance for India. Cooperation between the two would not only reduce India’s dependability on China, but would also enable it to develop a safe and secure 5G network.
On the other hand, Taiwan would have access to India’s large market. Through India, Taiwan could easily expand its presence in other South Asian countries with which China has close relations.
It is equally important that India not merely see ties with Taiwan through a bilateral lens, but from a broader perspective. Enhanced economic ties between the countries would prove to be crucial in building robust global supply chains outside of China. Based upon this reasoning, India has realized the necessity of having a free-trade agreement.
While in a significant development the Indian Space Research Organization and the Indian Institute of Space Science and Technology are collaborating with Taiwan’s National Space Organization in launching a cubesat into space this month, it is imperative that the two countries work together on space exploration for civil and military purposes.
Taiwan and India should establish a joint working group to explore possibilities for enhanced cooperation, promote understanding of government policies and procedures, and facilitate collaboration by addressing issues promptly.
Closer cooperation in international initiatives, such as the Group on Earth Observations as well as efforts to develop a multiple hazards early warning and response system, would serve national objectives on both sides.
Another area of cooperation that India and Taiwan should explore is green energy. As India, an energy deficient country, tries to increase the contribution of green energy to its total energy consumption, Taiwan, a major Asian green energy giant, can play a pivotal role in this regard.
The time has come for India and Taiwan not only to accelerate the pace of cooperation in areas such as trade and commerce, and people-to-people engagement, but also aim for bilateral engagement in new areas.
Sumit Kumar is a former Ministry of Foreign Affairs visiting fellow at National Chengchi University and a post-doctoral fellow at the Indian Council of Social Sciences.
A failure by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to respond to Israel’s brilliant 12-day (June 12-23) bombing and special operations war against Iran, topped by US President Donald Trump’s ordering the June 21 bombing of Iranian deep underground nuclear weapons fuel processing sites, has been noted by some as demonstrating a profound lack of resolve, even “impotence,” by China. However, this would be a dangerous underestimation of CCP ambitions and its broader and more profound military response to the Trump Administration — a challenge that includes an acceleration of its strategies to assist nuclear proxy states, and developing a wide array
Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), former chairman of Broadcasting Corp of China and leader of the “blue fighters,” recently announced that he had canned his trip to east Africa, and he would stay in Taiwan for the recall vote on Saturday. He added that he hoped “his friends in the blue camp would follow his lead.” His statement is quite interesting for a few reasons. Jaw had been criticized following media reports that he would be traveling in east Africa during the recall vote. While he decided to stay in Taiwan after drawing a lot of flak, his hesitation says it all: If
Twenty-four Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers are facing recall votes on Saturday, prompting nearly all KMT officials and lawmakers to rally their supporters over the past weekend, urging them to vote “no” in a bid to retain their seats and preserve the KMT’s majority in the Legislative Yuan. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which had largely kept its distance from the civic recall campaigns, earlier this month instructed its officials and staff to support the recall groups in a final push to protect the nation. The justification for the recalls has increasingly been framed as a “resistance” movement against China and
Saturday is the day of the first batch of recall votes primarily targeting lawmakers of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). The scale of the recall drive far outstrips the expectations from when the idea was mooted in January by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘). The mass recall effort is reminiscent of the Sunflower movement protests against the then-KMT government’s non-transparent attempts to push through a controversial cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014. That movement, initiated by students, civic groups and non-governmental organizations, included student-led protesters occupying the main legislative chamber for three weeks. The two movements are linked
RSS