As climate change pushes states in the US to dramatically cut their use of fossil fuels, many are coming to the conclusion that solar, wind and other renewable power sources might not be enough to keep the lights on.
Nuclear power is emerging as an answer to fill the gap as states transition away from coal, oil and natural gas to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and stave off the worst effects of a warming planet. The renewed interest in nuclear power comes as companies, including one started by Microsoft cofounder Bill Gates, are developing smaller, cheaper reactors to supplement the power grid in communities across the US.
Nuclear power comes with its own set of potential problems, especially radioactive waste that can remain dangerous for thousands of years.
However, supporters say the risks can be minimized and that the energy source is essential to stabilizing power supplies as the world tries to move away from carbon dioxide-emitting fossil fuels.
You cannot significantly reduce carbon emissions without nuclear power, Tennessee Valley Authority president and chief executive officer Jeff Lyash said.
“At this point in time, I don’t see a path that gets us there without preserving the existing fleet and building new nuclear,” Lyash said.
The federally owned utility is adding solar capacity, but also operates three nuclear plants and plans to test a small reactor. By 2050, it hopes to become net zero, which means the amount of greenhouse gases produced is no more than the amount removed from the atmosphere.
An Associated Press survey of the energy policies in all 50 US states and the District of Columbia found that a large majority — about two-thirds — said that nuclear, in one fashion or another, would help take the place of fossil fuels.
That momentum could lead to the first expansion of nuclear reactor construction in the US in more than three decades.
About one-third of the states and the District of Columbia said that they have no plans to incorporate nuclear power in their green energy goals, instead leaning heavily on renewables.
They pointed to advances in energy storage using batteries, investments in the grid for high-voltage interstate transmission, energy efficiency efforts to reduce demand and power provided by hydroelectric dams.
The split over nuclear power mirrors a similar debate unfolding in Europe.
US President Joe Biden’s administration has tried to take aggressive steps to reduce greenhouse gases in the US. The US$1 trillion infrastructure package passed last year is to allocate about US$2.5 billion to advanced reactor demonstration projects.
US Secretary of Energy Jennifer Granholm said that the administration wants to get to zero-carbon electricity, and that means using nuclear, hydropower, geothermal, wind and solar power sources.
“We want it all,” she said.
Nuclear technology still comes with significant risks that other low-carbon energy sources do not, said Edwin Lyman, director of nuclear power safety at the Union of Concerned Scientists.
He is worried that the industry might cut safety and security corners to save money and compete.
The union does not oppose using nuclear power, but wants to make sure it is safe.
The US also has no long-term plan for managing or disposing of the hazardous waste, and there remains the danger of accidents or targeted attacks, Lyman said.
Nuclear disasters at Pennsylvania’s Three Mile Island, Chernobyl and more recently, the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant in Japan in 2011 provide an enduring warning.
Nuclear power already provides about 20 percent of electricity in the US, or about half of the nation’s carbon-free energy.
The US Nuclear Regulatory Commission has approved just one of the new, small modular reactor designs — from NuScale Power in 2020.
Gates’ company, TerraPower, wants to build an advanced reactor in Wyoming, which has long depended on coal for power and jobs.
As utilities quit coal, Wyoming is tapping into wind.
However, Wyoming Energy Authority Executive Director Glen Murrell said it is unrealistic to expect all the nation’s energy to be provided exclusively through wind and solar.
Georgia maintains that its nuclear reactor expansion would provide “ample clean energy” for 60 to 80 years.
New Hampshire said the region’s environmental goals would be impossible to meet affordably without nuclear power.
Energy agencies in Alaska and Maryland are planning for small modular nuclear reactors.
Other officials, mostly in Democratic-led states, said they are moving beyond nuclear power.
Some said they never relied heavily on it to begin with and do not see a need for it.
They said the cost of new reactors compared with installing wind turbines or solar panels, the safety concerns and the unresolved question of how to store hazardous nuclear waste are deal-breakers. Some environmentalists oppose small modular reactors for similar reasons.
New York’s future energy grid is to be dominated by wind, solar and hydropower, New York State Energy Research and Development Authority president and chief executive officer Doreen Harris said.
Nevada officials do not consider nuclear power a viable option, because of the failed plan to store the nation’s commercial spent nuclear fuel at Yucca Mountain. Instead, they see potential for energy storage and geothermal energy.
“A focus on short-term gains can’t alleviate the long-term issues with nuclear energy,” David Bobzien, director of the Nevada Governor’s Office of Energy, said in a statement.
California is slated to close its last remaining nuclear power plant, Diablo Canyon, in 2025, as it turns to cheaper renewables to power its grid by 2045. Officials plan to sustain the expansion of clean electricity generation at a record-breaking rate. California also imports power from other states.
Skeptics have questioned whether the plan can work in a state of nearly 40 million people.
Columbia Climate School cofounding dean Jason Bordoff said that there is “good reason” to think about extending the life of Diablo Canyon to keep energy costs down and reduce emissions quickly.
Nuclear energy is not risk free, he said, “but the risks of falling short of our climate goals exceed the risks of including nuclear energy as part of the zero-carbon energy mix.”
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
Gogoro Inc was once a rising star and a would-be unicorn in the years prior to its debut on the NASDAQ in 2022, as its environmentally friendly technology and stylish design attracted local young people. The electric scooter and battery swapping services provider is bracing for a major personnel shakeup following the abrupt resignation on Friday of founding chairman Horace Luke (陸學森) as chief executive officer. Luke’s departure indicates that Gogoro is sinking into the trough of unicorn disillusionment, with the company grappling with poor financial performance amid a slowdown in demand at home and setbacks in overseas expansions. About 95