After China last month rejected a shipment of 24,000 bottles of Lithuanian-produced dark rum, state-owned Taiwan Tobacco and Liquor Corp earlier this month said it had purchased the lot.
It seems that Beijing has no intention of letting up pressure on Lithuania, and the US does not seem to understand that this kind of political manipulation can be considered a weapon.
Perhaps the only country that is motivated to help Lithuania is Taiwan. However, Taiwanese should understand three things.
First, Lithuania’s annual export volume to China is about US$300 million, and its exports to Taiwan are just more than US$30 million. Taiwan’s exports to Lithuania are three times higher than Lithuania’s to Taiwan. This leaves much room for Taiwan to at least expand its imports from Lithuania in kind.
Second, Lithuania has a population of about 2.8 million, about equal to Taipei’s population. Thus, Taiwan is a large market for the Baltic state.
Third, Lithuania’s main exports are not chocolate and beer. They are mineral oil, machine tools and auto parts. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co and other large Taiwanese firms are eager to join the global technology supply chain, so they can meet their needs by purchasing such products from Lithuania directly. Meanwhile, the government could make purchases from the country, so that small and medium-sized enterprises would not have to worry about a shortage of materials.
It is important that Taiwan comes to Lithuania’s aid, because if Taiwan regards itself as a key member of the supply chain in the new Indo-Pacific region, then it should prove its ability to not only shelter an ally from attack when it is being sanctioned by China for supporting Taiwan, but also help establish a new economic order. By doing so, Taiwan can slap China in the face, while substantially promoting its international influence.
Lithuania’s main export products are urgently needed by Taiwan’s military, which is looking for ways to boost its national defense autonomy. In addition, the Czech Republic, Slovenia, Slovakia and other countries are watching Lithuania’s moves and how Taiwan responds.
Although the Taiwanese market is not as large as the massive Chinese market, if the government mobilizes its resources, it can save Lithuania from Beijing’s wave of attacks.
If Taiwan fails to block the economic assaults, the inroads it has made with central and eastern European countries would be cut off by China, and its hard work would have been in vain.
Taiwan can help Lithuania restore its status in the face of Chinese sanctions, and perhaps even improve its situation. Instead of purchasing beer and chocolate, which are finished goods whose sales rely on the size of the market, Taiwan should concentrate on purchasing half-finished goods such as mineral oil, machine tools and auto parts.
Hopefully the government can seize this opportunity and deal a heavy blow to China’s economic warfare, and relieve the pressure on Lithuania.
Wang Wen-sheng is a retired political operations officer and a doctoral student at Jindal University in India.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US