The results of a legislative by-election for Taichung’s second electoral district and a recall vote in Taipei’s fifth electoral district on Sunday were announced on the day.
The Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) candidate, Lin Ching-yi (林靜儀), won the by-election, while independent Legislator Freddy Lim (林昶佐), despite having more people vote in favor of his recall than against it, survived, as the number of voters fell short of the threshold.
For the past year or so, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has instigated four retributive recalls and instigated one by-election. Looking at the results alone, two of the recalls — of former DPP Taoyuan city councilor Wang Hao-yu (王浩宇) and former Taiwan Statebuilding Party legislator Chen Po-wei (陳柏惟) — were successful, while the other two — of independent Kaohsiung City Councilor Huang Jie (黃捷) and Lim — failed.
What these figures fail to convey is that after the huge social cost in terms of effort, money and material resources, Wang and Chen temporarily lost their seats in the legislature, while the DPP gained a seat.
Meanwhile, the hapless KMT, which put so much effort and resources into the recall drives, has not only suffered defeats, but faces the embarrassment of being exposed over its inability to decouple itself from corrupt local interests.
The KMT’s recalls against Wang and Huang had nothing to do with the ability of the officials to do their jobs, and the fact that neither recall would have led to a legislative by-election demonstrated their vindictive nature.
Wang did not call on the DPP — which he had joined less than a year previously — to support him, neither did he call on his supporters vote against his recall.
These decisions contributed to his ouster.
Wang’s recall significantly boosted the confidence of the KMT, which had initiated the recall motion.
It also made the DPP sense a whiff of danger.
As a result, the DPP’s presence was felt in the campaigns to prevent the subsequent recalls from succeeding, even though the objects of those drives — Huang, Chen and Lim — were either independent or belonged to a small political party.
The recall campaigns became a contest between the governing party and the opposition, and Huang averted disaster while Lim emerged unscathed, the vote count notwithstanding.
Chen’s defeat can largely be understood as a result of local power politics.
Although the KMT got its face bloodied in the Taichung by-election, the biggest losers by far were the political figures in the Yen (顏) family.
Yen Kuan-heng (顏寬恒), the KMT’s candidate, not only lost, but a string of scandals involving real-estate holdings and allegedly illegal construction by himself and members of his family were unearthed during the election campaign.
It is difficult to see any positive outcomes from the pan-blue camp’s recall drive, save for the true nature of the Yen family being exposed and the possibility that the political shenanigans will expedite the end of this pernicious force.
Chang Kuo-tsai is a retired associate professor at National Hsinchu University of Education.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US