Global leaders who have pledged to halt deforestation by 2030 must move quickly to strengthen forest protection laws, line up funding and include indigenous people in conservation efforts to have the best chance of success, environmentalists have said.
More than 100 leaders last month agreed to halt and reverse deforestation and land degradation by the end of the decade, underpinned by US$19 billion in public and private funds to invest in protecting and restoring forests.
The commitment — made at the COP26 climate talks in Glasgow, Scotland, and backed by forest-rich countries such as Brazil, Indonesia and the Democratic Republic of the Congo — covers forests totaling more than 33.7 million square kilometers.
Illustration: Mountain People
Fran Raymond Price, global forest practice lead at environmental group WWF International, said that there is an urgent need to see the Glasgow forest declaration turned into meaningful action.
“The political will demonstrated by the governments who signed this commitment is a welcome first step,” she said. “We need to see this now translated into legislative action within the next year or two, with transparency, accountability and involvement of ... indigenous peoples and local communities.”
Cutting down forests has major implications for global goals aimed at curbing warming, as trees absorb about one-third of the planet-heating carbon emissions produced worldwide, but release the carbon they store when they rot or are burned.
Forests also provide food and livelihoods, clean the air and water, support human health, are an essential habitat for wildlife, regulate rainfall and offer flood protection.
Last year, an area of tropical forest the size of the Netherlands was lost, monitoring service Global Forest Watch said.
The Glasgow declaration was broadly welcomed, but many environmentalists noted similar zero-deforestation pledges had repeatedly been made and not met by governments and businesses.
Those include the 2014 New York Declaration on Forests (NYDF), UN sustainability goals and targets set by global household brands.
Under the Glasgow pledge, further meetings of leaders and ministers are expected starting next year to assess progress and drive implementation of the pact.
“Transparency, as well as continued pressure from civil society, indigenous groups, and local communities and consumers, will be critical elements to monitor the progress on commitments and enable success,” Price said about the deal’s implementation. “For the future of our forests, we need this declaration to succeed.”
FOREST SAFEGUARDS
An annual report published in October on the NYDF — backed by more than 200 countries, firms and green groups — found that the sustained forest-loss reductions needed to meet its 2030 target to end deforestation are highly unlikely.
To avoid the Glasgow pact meeting a similar fate, countries that committed to the accord and import deforestation-risk commodities — such as palm oil, soy, timber and beef — need to quickly introduce legislation and regulations to boost conservation.
Companies in richer countries such as China, the US, the UK and those in the EU often rely on such raw materials to fuel their businesses, but do not always have safeguards to protect forests.
There has been some progress with the EU and the US proposing new laws aimed at curbing the import of commodities linked to deforestation.
Countries should also make it mandatory for businesses in those commodity sectors to put in place human rights and deforestation safeguards, environmentalists said.
As well, companies should use technology to monitor forest destruction and ensure that supply chains are sustainable and transparent, they said.
Forest-rich nations where many of these commodities are produced also need to implement new and stricter laws to halt deforestation and land conversion, they added.
Those should include incentives for small landowners and local communities to bolster forest protection, they said.
“A good and logical first step by the signatory governments would be to issue a moratorium on all further destruction and degradation of intact forests,” Rainforest Foundation Norway secretary-general Toerris Jaeger said.
“Once an area of intact forests is fragmented and opened up through road construction, it’s extremely hard to avoid further deforestation and loss of carbon to the atmosphere,” he said.
Indonesia’s environment minister dismissed as “inappropriate and unfair” the Glasgow deal to end deforestation by 2030, in an abrupt about-face just days after her country agreed to the pledge.
However, the Southeast Asian nation, home to the world’s third-largest tropical forest and also its biggest palm-oil producer, has seen deforestation rates buck the worsening global trend in the past few years.
That is partly due to an Indonesian moratorium on new conversion permits for primary forest and peatland, and on new palm oil plantations.
Jaeger said that the national climate action plans submitted by the five largest rainforest countries under the Paris Agreement would still allow 20 million hectares of tropical forests to be cut down over the next decade.
“Ending deforestation will require changes in policy, regulation, governance and financial incentives across different countries and actors to make it more valuable to keep the forest than destroy it,” he said.
ACTION NEEDED
In a sign of the scale of the challenge, deforestation in Brazil’s Amazon rainforest soared 22 percent in a year to the highest level since 2006, the government’s annual report showed last month.
The data undercut Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro’s assurances that the country is curbing illegal logging.
While causes of deforestation vary from place to place, some of the challenges faced are common across different regions, Jaeger said.
These include a lack of policies that efficiently regulate land use and deforestation, lax or missing enforcement of laws and regulations that do exist, and weak land rights for the traditional communities that live in the forests.
Other problems are financial incentives that stimulate economic or subsistence activities driving deforestation, and a lack of financial reward for protecting forests, he added.
“A joint approach across all these dimensions is needed to bend the curve and end deforestation by 2030,” Jaeger said. “It’s important to act fast and not wait as we approach 2030 to start reducing deforestation.”
Nations must also develop ways to reward the maintenance of intact forests, and the restoration of degraded and deforested areas, to make it feasible to end deforestation and increase forest cover, Jaeger said.
Funding in large part must come from rich countries, he added.
A study published late last month by the University of Sheffield found that, globally, indigenous peoples’ lands have about one-fifth less deforestation than non-protected areas.
“Indigenous peoples must be at the center of forest protection,” Greenpeace’s Indonesian forests campaign head Kiki Taufik said. “Efforts to halt deforestation cannot succeed without rapid recognition of indigenous peoples’ land rights.”
JOIN HANDS
For the Glasgow pledge to be effective, it must include a simple reporting mechanism that transparently discloses progress, said Emmanuelle Berenger, sustainable forest management lead at certification body the Rainforest Alliance.
As well, all government ministries must work together, not separately, on tackling deforestation, while financiers and businesses also need to build strong alliances around the Glasgow declaration’s goals, she added.
In agriculture, firms should move rapidly to responsible sourcing, ensuring that human rights are respected and local communities’ livelihoods are considered, she said, adding that affordable technologies — such as satellite imaging — are available to monitor progress of the declaration.
Forest protection received unprecedented visibility at the COP26 meeting, but countries need to pivot swiftly from commitments and goodwill to action, including providing more financial support, said Tim Christophersen, head of the UN Environment Programme’s Nature for Climate Branch.
That should happen no later than the COP27 climate summit, set to be held next year in Egypt, he added.
The Glasgow meeting should provide the impetus for nations to build strong partnerships with buyers, sellers and other parties in the “forest carbon value chain,” especially indigenous and local people, he said.
“Never have we attempted this kind of complex systems change in such a short time frame ... but we have all we need to make it happen,” he said of the 2030 goal.
“We have climate champions across society — from youth leadership in the global north to the indigenous peoples of the global south. We have only to join hands and make it happen,” he added.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
RSS