The reports of Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Kao Chia-yu (高嘉瑜) being physically abused by her then-partner shocked the nation. Many older viewers in front of the television might be wondering: “What’s wrong with the love lives of young people nowadays?” Younger viewers might be wondering: “Can love ever be trusted again?”
Taiwan’s cosmopolitan values are greatly influenced by the Western media. These influences have borne plenty of fruit in the realm of social justice and in the battle for gender equality, which has gotten the nation noticed on the international stage.
With the rise of the “Internet generation,” who came of age during Taiwan’s era of cosmopolitan values, Taiwan has broken with many traditional viewpoints over the past decade, especially regarding marriage and young people.
Young couples increasingly choose to “live together,” without the intention of marrying. This new “norm” has not come up with a definitive answer for the question of “Where does love lead to eventually?” In an era that values individualism, can the freedom of living as a single person with romantic partners sustain Taiwan as a community?
Many young people, like me, might question the need to marry, given Taiwan’s high cost of living and the family issues that accompany marriage.
However, fewer people seem to have thought deeply about or questioned the purpose of “not marrying.”
The Western concept of marriage is rooted in long-standing Christian values. Catholics call it “holy matrimony” to signify the value that they place on marriage, but with the decline of Christianity among the younger generation, views on marriage have also seen rapid change.
If we take a look outside Taiwan, New Zealand is perhaps the most liberal Anglophone country when it comes to legalizing “partnerships” of same or opposite-sex couples without the need for marriage. According to the government Web portal Stats NZ, romantic relationships outside of marriage have not shown a decrease in legal separations or domestic abuse.
This is an era when marriage is no longer a relationship of unbreakable “holy ground.” As that Taiwanese saying goes: “A happy marriage is 0.5 + 0.5 = 1.” Two people must give up a big part of themselves to unify as one in a relationship.
Committing to a partnership outside the obligation of marriage seems to be a good way to “pick and choose” what best suits each partner. In an age of individualism, this can do no harm.
Downplaying the necessity of marriage in adult life is a new experience in Taiwanese society. Psychological studies have shown that being in a stable relationship with an intimate partner can maximize well-being in older age. In an era when marriage has become nothing more than a signed legal document, people should ask themselves: Can partnerships replace marriage as what sustains a liberalized Taiwanese society, given the complex reality of human nature?
Ichen Sun is a musician and researcher at the University of Auckland.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
RSS