Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has reportedly said that the time for the anti-nuclear movement has passed and that restarting construction on the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in New Taipei City’s Gongliao District (貢寮) is necessary to deal with Taiwan’s power shortage problems.
All Taiwan needs to do is fly in nuclear fuel rods, which would generate electricity for 18 months, Ma said.
This is one of several myths that members of the pan-blue camp are perpetuating. The Chinese phrase commonly used for describing the plan omits the word “construction,” and therefore erroneously implies that construction is finished and the plant is ready to operate. The question would just be whether to “reactivate” it.
Construction on the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant was not completed when it was mothballed, and it was the longest nuclear power plant construction project in the world. The budget was increased initially from NT$169.7 billion (US$6.12 billion at the current exchange rate) to NT$283.9 billion.
The project was initially divided into more than 1,000 separate projects, and has seen a budget freeze, redesign, construction problems, embezzlement, suspension and restarting of construction, and postponement. This Frankensteinian approach is a hazard itself.
Moreover, the biggest myth in the the pan-blue camp’s pro-nuclear power narratives relates to the plant’s location.
The world-leading science journal Nature in its April 2011 issue published a highly recommended article titled “Reactors, residents and risk” by staff writer Declan Butler, which reveals the relationship between the locations of nuclear power plants and population density. The main points are as follows:
First, two-thirds of the world’s nuclear power plants — 211 at the time — had more people living within 30km of them than Japan’s Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant, which had 172,000 living within that radius. Twenty-one plants had populations larger than 1 million living within that radius, and six had populations larger than 3 million.
Second, Pakistan’s Karachi Nuclear Power Plant had the most people — 8.2 million — living in its proximity, although it has just one relatively small reactor.
Taiwan’s nuclear power plants had the next-biggest populations living within 30km.
The Guosheng Nuclear Power Plant in New Taipei City’s Wanli District (萬里) had 5.5 million people within 30km, and the Jinshan Nuclear Power Plant in New Taipei City’s Shihmen District (石門) had 4.7 million, both with reactors many times larger than the Karachi plant.
Taipei is within 30km of both plants, which the article described as “scary.”
Third, reactor safety depends above all on a “culture of security,” including the quality of maintenance and training, the competence of the operator and the workforce, and the rigor of regulatory oversight.
Some Taiwanese nuclear power advocates are without a doubt “overconfident.”
James Carville, a political strategist of former US president Bill Clinton, coined the phrase “it’s the economy, stupid.”
Likewise, members in the pan-blue camp should consider the phrase “it’s the location, stupid.” Taiwan remains the only country with its capital and more than 5 million people living within 30km of nuclear power plants.
Does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) wish that these 5 million people live in fear?
For the safety of Taiwan and its people, I will vote “no” on the referendum question on restarting construction on the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant.
Please join me in doing so.
Jerry Liu is the New Power Party’s international affairs department director and a former diplomat.
Translated by Rita Wang
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
In a stark reminder of China’s persistent territorial overreach, Pema Wangjom Thongdok, a woman from Arunachal Pradesh holding an Indian passport, was detained for 18 hours at Shanghai Pudong Airport on Nov. 24 last year. Chinese immigration officials allegedly informed her that her passport was “invalid” because she was “Chinese,” refusing to recognize her Indian citizenship and claiming Arunachal Pradesh as part of South Tibet. Officials had insisted that Thongdok, an Indian-origin UK resident traveling for a conference, was not Indian despite her valid documents. India lodged a strong diplomatic protest, summoning the Chinese charge d’affaires in Delhi and demanding
Immediately after the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) “Justice Mission” exercise at the end of last year, a question was posed to Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal regarding recent developments involving the exercises around Taiwan, and how he viewed their impact on regional peace and stability. His answer was somewhat perplexing to me as a curious student of Taiwanese affairs. “India closely follows developments across the Indo-Pacific region,” he said, adding: “We have an abiding interest in peace and stability in the region, in view of our significant trade, economic, people-to-people, and maritime interests. We urge all concerned
In the past 72 hours, US Senators Roger Wicker, Dan Sullivan and Ruben Gallego took to social media to publicly rebuke the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) over the defense budget. I understand that Taiwan’s head is on the chopping block, and the urgency of its security situation cannot be overstated. However, the comments from Wicker, Sullivan and Gallego suggest they have fallen victim to a sophisticated disinformation campaign orchestrated by an administration in Taipei that treats national security as a partisan weapon. The narrative fed to our allies claims the opposition is slashing the defense budget to kowtow to the Chinese
RSS