Excerpts from previously unpublished documents directly linking China’s crackdown on Uighur Muslims and other minorities in Xinjiang province to speeches by the Chinese leadership in 2014 have been put online.
The documents — including three speeches by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in April 2014 — cover security, population control and the need to punish the Uighur population. Some are marked top secret.
They were leaked to the Uighur Tribunal, an independent people’s tribunal based in the UK.
In the documents, the highest levels of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leadership call for Uighur re-education and relocation to rectify an imbalance in the Uighur and Han population in Xinjiang.
Adrian Zenz, the German academic who was asked by the tribunal to authenticate the documents, said that they are significant because they show multiple links between the demands of the Chinese leadership of 2014 and what subsequently happened in Xinjiang, including mass internment in re-education camps, coercive labor transfers and optimizing the ethnic population by increasing Han population shares.
Zenz says that the documents show the leadership’s long-term intent to commit cultural genocide with the specific purpose of safeguarding the rule of the CCP.
The documents were handed in full in digital form to the Uighur Tribunal — an independent people’s tribunal based in the UK — in September, but have not been published in full to protect the source of the leak.
Instead, transcripts from some of the documents, lengthy quotations, a summary and an analysis have been published. The transcripts were peer reviewed by James Millward, professor of inter-societal history at Georgetown University Washington, and David Tobin, lecturer in East Asian studies at the University of Sheffield. Some have been redacted to remove reception stamps. The leak covers 11 documents and 300 unique pages. They range from April 2014 to May 2018.
Zenz said some of the documents were drawn from by the New York Times in a report in 2019, but the recent leak includes previously unseen information.
In late 2016, just before the implementation of a set of unprecedented measures in Xinjiang, the leaders’ statements were handed to Xinjiang’s cadres as crucial study material, preparing them to implement the measures.
In one 2014 speech covered by the leak, Xi said that the Belt and Road Initiative, his signature foreign policy project, requires a stable domestic security environment. He asserted that the entire country’s national security and the achievement of China’s major goals in the 21st century would be in jeopardy if the situation in southern Xinjiang is not brought under control.
The speech was delivered weeks after Xi called for “all-out efforts” to bring to justice assailants who murdered 31 people and wounded more than 140 with knives and machetes in a bloody killing in the southwestern city of Kunming on March 1. Beijing blamed Xinjiang separatists for the attack.
In the speech, Xi demands that the region engage in a thorough battle to “prevent Xinjiang’s violent terrorist activities from spreading to the rest of China,” saying that “stability across Xinjiang and even across the whole country depends on southern Xinjiang,” and calls for “a crushing blow to buy us time.”
Xi said that since violent acts had already spread to other regions of China, “we propose that Xinjiang is currently in a painful period of interventionary treatment.”
Religious extremists, he said, are “devils who will kill without blinking an eye.”
He also said that religious extremism is “a powerful psychedelic drug,” and calls for reform through education, as opposed to a practice of arrest and release — a reference to re-education and detention camps.
In another document, Xinjiang’s party secretary, Chen Quanguo (陳全國), personally commands officials to “round up all who should be rounded up” and said the region’s vocational re-education facilities should be “unswervingly operated for a long time.”
In one of Xi’s speeches, he said that “population proportion and population security are important foundations for long-term peace and stability.”
This statement was later quoted verbatim by a senior Xinjiang official in July last year, who then said that southern Xinjiang’s Han population share was “too low.”
Other classified documents lament “severe imbalances in the distribution of the ethnic population” and a “severely mono-ethnic” population structure — an over-concentration of Uighurs — in southern Xinjiang.
They mandate that by next year, 300,000 settlers — mostly Han from eastern China — are to be moved to regions in southern Xinjiang administered by the Xinjiang Construction and Production Corps, also known as bingtuan (兵團), a paramilitary entity, with the explicitly stated aim of increasing Han population shares in the region.
Xi himself ordered the abolition of preferential birth control policies for ethnic groups in southern Xinjiang that had previously allowed them to have more children than the Han. He demanded that policies in the Uighur heartland be made “equal for all ethnic groups.”
The fresh leak was first mentioned at a session of the UK-based tribunal on Saturday last week.
Government reports indicate that in February 2017, just weeks prior to the start of an internment campaign, leading cadres in prefectures and counties were subjected to an intensified study schedule of two of Xi’s speeches for at least two hours every week.
Zenz is a controversial figure denounced by defenders of Beijing as a Christian fundamentalist determined to destroy Chinese communism. The Chinese government has sanctioned him. It has always maintained that political, economic and religious freedoms in the Xinjiang region are “fully guaranteed.”
Zenz says the new material shows that top Chinese leaders viewed the achievement of “stability maintenance” and related goals such as religious “de-extremification” in Xinjiang to be a matter of China’s national security, crucial to achieving primary long-term political goals.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
Taiwan is confronting escalating threats from its behemoth neighbor. Last month, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army conducted live-fire drills in the East China Sea, practicing blockades and precision strikes on simulated targets, while its escalating cyberattacks targeting government, financial and telecommunication systems threaten to disrupt Taiwan’s digital infrastructure. The mounting geopolitical pressure underscores Taiwan’s need to strengthen its defense capabilities to deter possible aggression and improve civilian preparedness. The consequences of inadequate preparation have been made all too clear by the tragic situation in Ukraine. Taiwan can build on its successful COVID-19 response, marked by effective planning and execution, to enhance
Since taking office, US President Donald Trump has upheld the core goals of “making America safer, stronger, and more prosperous,” fully implementing an “America first” policy. Countries have responded cautiously to the fresh style and rapid pace of the new Trump administration. The US has prioritized reindustrialization, building a stronger US role in the Indo-Pacific, and countering China’s malicious influence. This has created a high degree of alignment between the interests of Taiwan and the US in security, economics, technology and other spheres. Taiwan must properly understand the Trump administration’s intentions and coordinate, connect and correspond with US strategic goals.
RSS