The US government has invited Taiwan and 110 other countries, including many in the EU, to take part in an online Summit for Democracy on Thursday and Friday.
A US Department of State spokesperson in October said that Taiwan could make meaningful commitments to the aims of the summit — defending against authoritarianism, fighting corruption and promoting human rights.
The spokesperson cited the high ranking awarded Taiwan by Transparency International, and praised the country for its use of emerging technologies to make governments more transparent and responsive to the public mood.
Taiwan has for more than a decade ranked about 30th out of the 180 countries and regions listed in Transparency International’s Corruption Perception Index (CPI), and for the past two years it has advanced to 28th place. It has also achieved passing scores throughout this period.
Among the East Asian countries that have not been invited to the Summit for Democracy, such as China, Vietnam, Thailand, Myanmar, Laos and Cambodia, all except for Singapore scored below 40 out of 100 in the CPI and ranked lower than 80th place.
Transparency International’s CPI is based on data collected from 13 highly respected international organizations such as the UK’s Economist Intelligence Unit and Switzerland’s Institute for Management Development. The information is processed through a secondary data analysis, followed by systematic and scientific scoring and ranking.
After more than 20 years, the CPI enjoys considerable international credibility and is highly regarded by national governments. It is for good reason that the State Department used this index as a reference for selecting which countries to invite to the summit.
In 2010, Taiwan established the Agency Against Corruption, which combined the pre-existing government ethics and investigative systems to establish a sound and comprehensive system for anti-corruption education, prevention and investigation.
Although Taiwan is not a UN member state, it has instituted the Act to Implement the United Nations Convention Against Corruption (聯合國反貪腐公約施行法), and it adheres to the provisions of the convention. Taiwan has gained international recognition for its concerted efforts in this regard.
The chairperson of Transparency International has been invited to give a presentation at the summit on Thursday. There is to be a forum to discuss how corruption hurts democracy, which is expected to issue a joint declaration against corruption.
It is good to see how seriously democratic countries are taking the issue of corruption, and Taipei is no doubt happy to share with other countries its experience in using new technologies to make governments more transparent.
However, the nation must not be complacent about its achievements with regard to clean government, but rather strive to do even better.
For example, two years ago the Ministry of Justice invited international experts to review Taiwan’s achievements in implementing the UN Convention Against Corruption. The experts recommended that Taiwan should institute a “whistle-blower protection act” and strengthen anti-corruption awareness and regulations in the private sector, but no progress has been made on these proposals.
Hopefully, the Legislative Yuan and government ethics agencies can act a bit faster to further enhance Taiwan’s achievements in democracy and clean government.
Hsu Jen-hui is chair of Transparency International Chinese Taipei.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Minister of Labor Hung Sun-han (洪申翰) on April 9 said that the first group of Indian workers could arrive as early as this year as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center in India and the India Taipei Association. Signed in February 2024, the MOU stipulates that Taipei would decide the number of migrant workers and which industries would employ them, while New Delhi would manage recruitment and training. Employment would be governed by the laws of both countries. Months after its signing, the two sides agreed that 1,000 migrant workers from India would
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
On March 31, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs released declassified diplomatic records from 1995 that drew wide domestic media attention. One revelation stood out: North Korea had once raised the possibility of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In a meeting with visiting Chinese officials in May 1995, as then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) prepared for a visit to South Korea, North Korean officials objected to Beijing’s growing ties with Seoul and raised Taiwan directly. According to the newly released records, North Korean officials asked why Pyongyang should refrain from developing relations with Taiwan while China and South Korea were expanding high-level
Japan’s imminent easing of arms export rules has sparked strong interest from Warsaw to Manila, Reuters reporting found, as US President Donald Trump wavers on security commitments to allies, and the wars in Iran and Ukraine strain US weapons supplies. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s ruling party approved the changes this week as she tries to invigorate the pacifist country’s military industrial base. Her government would formally adopt the new rules as soon as this month, three Japanese government officials told Reuters. Despite largely isolating itself from global arms markets since World War II, Japan spends enough on its own
RSS