A Taiwanese Public Opinion Foundation survey released on Oct. 26 suggested that the government was likely to be defeated in the four referendums scheduled for Dec. 18.
Three of the referendums concern major planks in the government’s policy for expanding overseas trade and changing the nation’s energy mix, and are therefore crucial for its plans for national development. A defeat across the board, in what the opposition is trying to equate with a vote of no confidence in the government in general and Premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) in particular, would be a major setback for the government’s agenda.
The poll results suggest that if the government wants to win the argument and persuade Taiwanese to vote “no” and therefore support Su’s policies, the boat has already sailed. The opposition’s message on the issues of restarting construction of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant, banning imports of pork containing ractopamine residues, relocating a planned third liquefied natural gas (LNG) receiving station to protect algal reefs in Taoyuan, and holding referendums and elections on the same day seem to have proven persuasive.
All four issues require rational debate; the debates for the first three, in particular, should be based on facts, looking at the underlying science. The opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has preferred to steer clear of facts or science in its argument, and has turned the referendums into primarily political issues. The Democratic Progressive Party has mostly held its fire, until more scientific, rational debate has come to the fore over the past week. It seems to be betting on getting its own arguments out this late in the day, in the belief that minds have not been made up irretrievably, and that the argument that remains fresh in people’s minds when it is time to vote will remain persuasive enough for the government to win on the day.
On Monday, experts from the Taiwan Medical Association and Public Research Institute of Taiwan urged those involved in the debate to refrain from using the term “toxic pork” when referring to meat containing residues of ractopamine, saying that it did not cohere with facts. They also tried to paint a more objective picture of what nuclear power means for pollution levels and the risk of nuclear disaster, together with the practical problems of dealing with nuclear waste and spent fuel rods.
Saturday last week saw live televised debates on the issues of linking referendums and elections and the relocation of the LNG terminal. The former was between KMT Legislator Johnny Chiang (江啟臣) and Deputy Minister of the Interior Chen Tsung-yen (陳宗彥), and was purely political. The latter was between environmentalist Chen Hsien-cheng (陳憲政) and Minister of Economic Affairs Wang Mei-hua (王美花), making the dynamic entirely different, and yet equally determined by the nature of the speakers. With the environmentalist debating the minister charged with the nation’s economic affairs, the two were able to get their respective points of view across without disagreeing with each other.
It is difficult to disagree with Chen Hsien-cheng’s arguments on face value, of the importance of protecting the environment, and that using gas for energy generation would not enable the nation to reduce carbon emissions in the most efficient way possible. However, the key is to find the right balance between environmental protection, national development and energy provision, especially with the return to Taiwan of many companies in the wake of the US-China trade dispute and the planned opening of a new Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co plant in Kaohsiung, within the context of the government’s plans for a staged transition of the nation’s energy mix to a more sustainable and carbon-free future.
This was the area in which Wang was able to lay out her argument.
People will find out on Dec. 18 whether voters found it persuasive enough.
A Chinese diplomat’s violent threat against Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi following her remarks on defending Taiwan marks a dangerous escalation in East Asian tensions, revealing Beijing’s growing intolerance for dissent and the fragility of regional diplomacy. Chinese Consul General in Osaka Xue Jian (薛劍) on Saturday posted a chilling message on X: “the dirty neck that sticks itself in must be cut off,” in reference to Takaichi’s remark to Japanese lawmakers that an attack on Taiwan could threaten Japan’s survival. The post, which was later deleted, was not an isolated outburst. Xue has also amplified other incendiary messages, including one suggesting
Chinese Consul General in Osaka Xue Jian (薛劍) on Saturday last week shared a news article on social media about Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s remarks on Taiwan, adding that “the dirty neck that sticks itself in must be cut off.” The previous day in the Japanese House of Representatives, Takaichi said that a Chinese attack on Taiwan could constitute “a situation threatening Japan’s survival,” a reference to a legal legal term introduced in 2015 that allows the prime minister to deploy the Japan Self-Defense Forces. The violent nature of Xue’s comments is notable in that it came from a diplomat,
China’s third aircraft carrier, the Fujian, entered service this week after a commissioning ceremony in China’s Hainan Province on Wednesday last week. Chinese state media reported that the Fujian would be deployed to the Taiwan Strait, the South China Sea and the western Pacific. It seemed that the Taiwan Strait being one of its priorities meant greater military pressure on Taiwan, but it would actually put the Fujian at greater risk of being compromised. If the carrier were to leave its home port of Sanya and sail to the East China Sea or the Yellow Sea, it would have to transit the
The artificial intelligence (AI) boom, sparked by the arrival of OpenAI’s ChatGPT, took the world by storm. Within weeks, everyone was talking about it, trying it and had an opinion. It has transformed the way people live, work and think. The trend has only accelerated. The AI snowball continues to roll, growing larger and more influential across nearly every sector. Higher education has not been spared. Universities rushed to embrace this technological wave, eager to demonstrate that they are keeping up with the times. AI literacy is now presented as an essential skill, a key selling point to attract prospective students.
RSS