Majestic, increasingly hungry and at risk of disappearing, the polar bear is dependent on something melting away on our warming planet: sea ice.
In the harsh and unforgiving arctic, where frigid cold is not just a way of life, but a necessity, the polar bear stands out.
However, where it lives, where it hunts, where it eats — it is disappearing underfoot in the crucial summertime.
“They have just always been a revered species by people, going back hundreds and hundreds of years,” Polar Bear International chief scientist Steve Amstrup said. “There’s just something special about polar bears.”
Scientists and advocates point to polar bears, marked as “threatened” on the endangered species list, as the white-hot warning signal for the rest of the planet — “the canary in the cryosphere.”
As world leaders meet in Glasgow, Scotland, to try to ramp up efforts to curb climate change, the specter of polar bears looms over them.
UN Environment Program Executive Director Inger Andersen — who leads the International Union for the Conservation of Nature, which monitors and classifies species in trouble — asks: “Do we really want to be the generation that saw the end of the ability of something as majestic as the polar bear to survive?”
Arctic sea ice — frozen ocean water — shrinks during the summer as it gets warmer, then forms again in the long winter.
How much it shrinks is where global warming kicks in, scientists say.
The more the sea ice shrinks in the summer, the thinner the ice is overall, because the ice is weaker first-year ice.
Julienne Stroeve, a researcher at the University of Manitoba, says that summers without sea ice are inevitable.
Many other experts agree with her. Former NASA chief scientist Waleed Abdalati is one of them.
“That’s something human civilization has never known,” said Abdalati, who is now an environmental researcher at the University of Colorado. “That’s like taking a sledgehammer to the climate system and doing something huge about it.”
The warming already in the oceans and in the air is committed — like a freight train in motion. So, no matter what, the Earth will soon see a summer with less than 1 million square kilometers of sea ice scattered in tiny bits across the arctic.
The big question is when the arctic will “look like a blue ocean,” US National Snow and Ice Data Center Director Mark Serreze said.
Maybe as early as the 2030s, most likely in the 2040s and almost assuredly by the 2050s, experts say.
The arctic has been warming twice as fast as the rest of the world.
In some seasons, it has warmed three times faster than the rest of the globe, said John Walsh, a researcher at the University of Alaska at Fairbanks.
That is because of something called “arctic amplification.” Essentially, white ice in the arctic reflects heat. When it melts, the dark sea absorbs much more heat, which warms the oceans even more quickly.
There are 19 different subpopulations of polar bears in the arctic. Each is a bit different. Some are really in trouble, especially the southernmost ones, while others are pretty close to stable.
However, their survival from place to place is linked heavily to sea ice.
“As you go to the arctic and see what’s happening with your own eyes ... it’s depressing,” said Kristin Laidre, a marine biologist at the University of Washington who has studied polar bears in Canada’s Baffin Bay.
Shrinking sea ice means shrinking polar bears.
In the summertime, polar bears go out on the ice to hunt and eat, feasting and putting on weight to sustain them through the winter. They prefer areas that are more than half covered with ice because they are the most productive hunting and feeding grounds, Amstrup said.
The more ice, the more they can move around and the more they can eat.
Just 30 or 40 years ago, the bears feasted on a buffet of seals and walrus on the ice.
In the 1980s, “the males were huge, females were reproducing regularly and cubs were surviving well,” Amstrup said. “The population looked good.”
With ice loss, the bears have not been doing as well, Amstrup said.
One sign is that higher proportion of cubs are dying before their first birthdays, he said.
Polar bears are land mammals that have adapted to the sea. The animals they eat — such as seals and walruses — are aquatic.
The bears fare best when they can hunt in shallow water, which is typically close to land.
“When sea ice is present over those near-shore waters, polar bears can make hay,” Amstrup said.
However, in the past few years, the sea ice has retreated far offshore in most summers.
That has forced the bears to drift on the ice into deep waters — sometimes more than 1km deep — that are devoid of their prey, Amstrup said.
Off Alaska, the Beaufort Sea and Chukchi Sea polar bears provide a telling contrast.
Go 50km to 65km offshore from Prudhoe Bay in the Beaufort Sea “and you’re in very unproductive waters,” Amstrup said.
Further south in the Chukchi Sea, it is shallower, which allows bottom-feeding walruses to thrive, providing food for polar bears, he said.
“The bears in the Chukchi seem to be faring pretty well because of that additional productivity,” Amstrup said.
However the bears of the Beaufort Sea “give us a real good early warning of where this is all coming to,” he said.
Even as world leaders meet in Scotland to try to ratchet up the effort to curb climate change, the scientists who monitor sea ice and watch polar bear populations know that much warming has been set in motion.
There is a chance, if negotiators succeed and everything turns out just right, that the world might once again see an arctic with significant sea ice in the summer late this century and in the next century, experts say.
However, until then “that door has been closed,” said Twila Moon, a scientist at the National Snow and Ice Data Center.
So hope is melting too.
“It’s near impossible for us to see a place where we don’t reach an essentially sea ice-free arctic, even if we’re able to do the work to create much, much lower emissions” of heat-trapping gases, Moon said. “Sea ice is one of those things that we’ll see reach some pretty devastating lows along that path. And we can already see those influences for polar bears.”
Elbridge Colby, America’s Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, is the most influential voice on defense strategy in the Second Trump Administration. For insight into his thinking, one could do no better than read his thoughts on the defense of Taiwan which he gathered in a book he wrote in 2021. The Strategy of Denial, is his contemplation of China’s rising hegemony in Asia and on how to deter China from invading Taiwan. Allowing China to absorb Taiwan, he wrote, would open the entire Indo-Pacific region to Chinese preeminence and result in a power transition that would place America’s prosperity
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and
All 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers and suspended Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安), formerly of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), survived recall elections against them on Saturday, in a massive loss to the unprecedented mass recall movement, as well as to the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) that backed it. The outcome has surprised many, as most analysts expected that at least a few legislators would be ousted. Over the past few months, dedicated and passionate civic groups gathered more than 1 million signatures to recall KMT lawmakers, an extraordinary achievement that many believed would be enough to remove at
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
RSS