Drones buzz above traffic-clogged roads in Ordos, Inner Mongolia, as white-capped police officers attempt to manage lines of hundreds of trucks waiting to be loaded with cargoes of coal. Many have been there for days.
The jams disrupting the Chinese city, one of the most critical coal hubs anywhere, show the enormous task facing the world’s top energy consumer as it races to ease a power crisis that is stifling key industries and that some economists warn risks crimping global growth.
For more than a month, energy shortages have rippled through China’s manufacturing centers for steel, aluminum and cement, and prices of coal — which the country relies on for almost two-thirds of its electricity — have made dizzying gains. As the approaching winter threatens to ratchet up demand, authorities are taking extraordinary steps to intervene.
These include reversing recent moves toward cleaner energy and better safety standards by reviving old and dirty coal mines; scrapping rules intended to keep power prices in check for industrial consumers; and considering increasing imports of foreign fuel at a time when trade relations with countries like Australia and the US remain frayed. Yet even these measures look unlikely to be drastic enough.
China’s government has also ordered coal miners to spare no expense in boosting output, calling on the sector to deliver more than 12 million tons (10.8 million metric tonnes) of the fuel a day in the final three months — the equivalent of additional 100 million tons, roughly what commodities giant Glencore produces in a year.
Missing that target might have ramifications far beyond Beijing.
“China could see its worst winter power shortage since 2010,” Citigroup analyst Tracy Liao said. “This would increase stagflation risks and growth pressure on the Chinese and the global economy over the coming winter, push energy prices higher and propel large-scale curtailments in commodity downstream sectors.”
Interviews with coal traders, mine engineers and officials, all of whom requested anonymity in discussing private details of their work, underscore the scale of China’s challenge. The country must fix its energy supply crunch, curb wild price gains and keep its longer-term climate goals on track.
China’s National Development and Reform Commission and the General Administration of Customs did not immediately respond to a faxed request for comment.
It is hard to overstate the squeeze on supply. Senior managers from State Power Investment Corp (SPIC), one of the country’s largest power firms, and representatives from southern Guizhou Province met late last month with key coal supplier China Shenhua Energy Co. A request for 3 million tons of the fuel ended with an agreement for only an additional 30,000 tons. The miner simply could not guarantee production would rise enough to offer more, according to people familiar with the discussions.
SPIC, China Shenhua and the Guizhou Development and Reform Commission did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Managers of power firms in other regions have raced between mines to secure supply, and to meet a government directive ordering coal-fired plants to keep more than seven days of fuel on hand. Even those prepared to accept eye-watering prices have been left frustrated. There is simply not enough coal to go around, they have been told.
Rolling blackouts have added to global supply-chain challenges, Tesla Inc said in an earnings report on Wednesday last week. The electric automaker is lifting output from its Shanghai plant, which has not suffered outages directly.
The lurch to burn more coal comes despite Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) commitment to reduce China’s consumption of the most-polluting fossil fuel from 2026. The nation was the only major polluter to record higher emissions last year than a year earlier, and that annual volume is expected to rise again. It is an awkward reality, with global climate talks scheduled to open in the coming days.
“As a major manufacturing power, China has to secure its energy supply in its own hands,” Xi said on Thursday, as he toured the Shengli oilfield in the eastern province of Shandong, a visit seen as confirming that fossil fuels remain central to the nation’s ambitions for energy security.
In Inner Mongolia, expansions for more than 70 coal mines were approved this month, with authorities demanding that work be completed before next month. Tasks that would ordinarily take months must now be condensed into a few weeks, according to staff. These jobs include planning how to add more capacity without risking damaging rock slides at the largely open-cut pits.
Some industry executives have said the push to produce more is likely to cost lives. One factor that slowed Chinese supply earlier in the year was stricter safety standards following a series of mining fatalities.
Even modern underground operations are encountering difficulties. Opening up fresh areas below the surface needs careful preparation to ensure safety and mine planning, while practical steps like adding cabling for electricity supply also take time.
“We would see risks in achieving this target in time for peak winter demand,” Morgan Stanley analyst Marius van Straaten said. “We do not believe that China’s coal shortage will significantly ease over the winter months.”
There are early signs that the measures are having some impact. In Ordos, production has jumped about 11 percent from last month and on some recent days the region has yielded more than any other global coal hub.
Idled mines are restarting in a matter of weeks, not months, and some sites would tap unused capacity to boost production quickly, said Yu Zhai, a coal analyst with Wood Mackenzie Ltd.
More than 20 regions, accounting for about two-thirds of China’s GDP, have imposed curbs on power supply in the past few weeks. Actions to lift supply and restrict heavy energy consumers mean that only Liaoning and Zhejiang provinces were encountering significant shortages by the middle of this month, from about 18 two weeks earlier, according to BloombergNEF. Still, January is typically the month when China’s power sector comes under most strain.
Coal output still needs to rise faster to keep pace with demand. Some in the industry have estimated the gap between coal demand and supply in China for the full year would be between 350 million and 400 million tons.
Imports from Indonesia are rising and some observers expect higher flows from Mongolia. Some Chinese officials have proposed lifting a ban on new imports of Australian coal, although that prospect has not yet won support from senior policymakers. Ties between Australia and China have soured dramatically in the past few years, prompting new restrictions on trade in commodities.
In any case, foreign coal accounts for only a fraction of China’s demand. Imports totaled about 304 million tons last year, compared with local output of about 3.8 billion tons.
That means restrictions on energy-intensive industries would continue, Yu said.
Output from sectors like steel and cement could decline 30 percent through the end of the year, according to UBS Group AG.
Higher electricity prices are also hitting heavy industry. Guangxi Province is adding a 50 percent premium for its top-consuming industries, which include production of alumina and aluminum. Broader price reforms have pushed up prices in Shandong and Jiangsu by about 20 percent.
“With a 50 percent increase, I believe demand for energy-intensive industries goes down immediately,” Lin Boqiang (林伯?), dean of the China Institute for Studies in Energy Policy at Xiamen University, and a consultative member of the National Energy Committee, told a Credit Suisse Group AG conference on Wednesday last week. “With the tariff increases, China can address its power shortage very quickly.”
Still, higher power prices add to inflationary pressures on Chinese factories, and it is unclear how long the nation’s leaders will allow growth to slow.
Chinese Premier Li Keqiang (李克強) earlier this month vowed to ensure power supplies for factories during a tour of Guangdong Province, an industrial center.
Action to cool coal’s price rally is having only mixed success, even after Chinese Vice Premier Han Zheng (韓正) last week vowed “powerful measures” against speculation and hoarding in the energy sector.
Coal futures have begun to tumble, after prices surged from the equivalent of US$131 a ton early last month to more than US$300 earlier this week.
However, physical cargoes remain at a record high and prices are unlikely to waver while shortages persist, according to traders. Efforts by some provinces to cap coal prices are also having little impact.
That leaves China’s energy crisis in the hands of the miners racing to dig up more coal. And La Nina is expected to bring a brutally cold winter likely to undo some of the gains made so far.
Even as trucks lined up at Inner Mongolia’s mines, workers in other parts of the region were turning on the central heating in homes and offices days earlier than expected as snow descended onto the arid plains.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US