Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, Michelle noticed her teenage daughters were spending substantially more time on Instagram. The girls were feeling isolated and bored during lockdown, the Arizona mom, who asked to only be identified by her first name to maintain her children’s privacy, recalled. She hoped social media could be a way for them to remain connected with their friends and community.
However, as the months progressed, the girls fell into pro-diet, pro-exercise and ultimately pro-eating-disorder hashtags on the social media app. It started with “health challenge” photos and recipe videos, Michelle said, which led to more similar content in their feeds.
Six months later, both had started restricting their food intake. Her eldest daughter developed “severe anorexia” and nearly had to be admitted to a health facility, Michelle said.
Michelle attributes their spiral largely to the influence of social media.
“Of course Instagram does not cause eating disorders,” Michelle said. “These are complex illnesses caused by a combination of genetics, neurobiology and other factors, but it helps to trigger them and keeps teens trapped in this completely toxic culture.”
Testimony from Facebook whistle-blower Frances Haugen last week revealed what parents of teens with unhealthy eating behaviors due to body-image fears had long known: Instagram has a substantial negative impact on some girls’ mental health regarding issues such as body image and self-esteem.
Internal research Haugen shared with the Wall Street Journal found the platform sends some girls on a “downward spiral.”
According to one presentation in March last year about the research, “32 percent of teen girls said that when they felt bad about their bodies, Instagram made them feel worse.”
Facebook did not immediately respond to a request for comment, but it has disputed the characterization of its internal research on Instagram.
“It is simply not accurate that this research demonstrates Instagram is ‘toxic’ for teen girls,” the company said in a statement last month. “The research actually demonstrated that many teens we heard from feel that using Instagram helps them when they are struggling with the kinds of hard moments and issues teenagers have always faced.”
The company has also criticized the internal presentation that the Wall Street Journal reporting was based on.
However, parents of teens with eating disorders who spoke with the Guardian following Haugen’s testimony said that finding out that Instagram’s parent company had research on Instagram’s impact had been infuriating.
They explained how their children had been directed from videos about recipes or exercise into pro-eating-disorder content and weight-loss progress images. They added that they struggled to regulate their children’s use of social media, which has become inextricable from their kids’ daily lives.
“They are responsible for triggering serious eating disorders in many individuals,” Michelle said about Facebook. “And after what we learned this week, it is evident they don’t care as long as they’re making money.”
‘There is nothing we can do about it,” she said.
Neveen Radwan, a parent living in the San Francisco Bay Area, said social media “has played a humongous role” in her 17-year-old daughter’s eating disorder. The teen had been harmed not only by content that was explicitly pro-anorexia or weight loss, but also by edited photos of influencers and real-life friends, she said.
“The second she opens the app, she is bombarded by photos that are filtered, that are manipulated,” Radwan said. “She is trying to attain something that is unachievable.”
Over the past few years, Radwan’s daughter has journeyed down a long road of recovery from a severe eating disorder. At one point, her weight was down to 33.6kg. Her heart stopped beating and she had to be airlifted to a specialized facility.
To help her daughter avoid the triggers she believes helped send her to the hospital, Radwan tried installing a number of safeguards on the girl’s phone. She uses built-in iPhone tools to keep her daughter from downloading apps without permission and monitors her online activity.
Recently, after a year and a half in treatment, Radwan’s daughter was allowed to have her phone back. However, within 30 minutes, the teen had sneaked around the restrictions to log into Instagram from the phone’s browser, Radwan said.
When her daughter had opened the app, her algorithm had been right where she had left it, Radwan said, in the midst of an endless feed of unhealthy eating and diet content.
“Once you look at one video, the algorithm takes off and they don’t stop coming — it’s like dominoes falling,” Radwan said. “It is horrific, and there is nothing we can do about it.”
However, experts say that Facebook could do something about it.
There are a number of proven tools that would prevent the spread of harmful content and misinformation, especially as it relates to eating disorders, said Madelyn Webb, associate research director for Media Matters for America.
Algorithms recommend content similar to what users have shared, viewed, or clicked on in the past — creating a feedback loop that some vulnerable teens cannot escape, she said.
“But they will never change it because their profit model is fundamentally based on getting more clicks,” she said.
Haugen, in her testimony, suggested Facebook return to a chronological rather than algorithmically driven timeline on the platform to reduce the spread of misinformation and inflammatory content.
Facebook has said it works to minimize such content by restricting hashtags that promote it. However, a report released last month by the advocacy group SumOfUs found 22 different hashtags promoting eating disorders still existed on Instagram at the time, and were connected to more than 45 million eating disorder-related posts.
The report found that 86.7 percent of eating disorder posts the researchers analyzed were pushing unapproved appetite suppressants and 52.9 percent directly promoted eating disorders.
Lucy, a mother in the Washington area who asked to be identified by a pseudonym to protect her privacy, said her daughter had struggled with an eating disorder at age 11 and had spent several years in remission.
However, when her social media use started picking up during the COVID-19 pandemic, the eating disorder re-emerged. Lucy said her daughter had changed quickly.
“By the time we found out she was getting this negative body messaging, it was too late — she was already into the eating disorder,” she said. “We watched our smart, lovely, caring, empathetic daughter turn into someone else.”
She has also taken measures to limit her daughter’s social media use — banning her phone from her room at night, restricting time on social media apps and talking to her about responsible use. However, she cannot take away the device completely, as so much of her daughter’s school and social life relies on it.
“Having that phone is like having a 24/7 billboard in front of you that says: ‘Don’t eat,’” Lucy said.
Compounding the problem was the difficulty in finding good and affordable care for teens like her daughter, she said.
“In much of the country there are no therapists. There are waiting lists for treatment facilities, and while you wait, this disease gets stronger, and people get closer to death,” she said.
The rate of eating disorders has risen sharply in recent years, in particular following the onset of the pandemic. A study published by CS Mott Children’s Hospital in Ann Arbor, Michigan, found that the total number of admissions to the hospital of children with eating disorders during the first 12 months of the pandemic was more than the average from the previous three years — at 125 young people compared with 56 in previous years.
Meanwhile, access to treatment in the US has remained extremely limited. Hospitals have run out of beds and inpatient treatment centers have long waiting lists.
Despite what many parents see as a direct line between Facebook and Instagram content and their children’s eating disorders, many struggle to leave the platform themselves.
Lucy said she felt “extremely conflicted” about her Facebook usage because the closed groups for parents of children dealing with eating disorders had been “a godsend.”
She recalled a particularly rough day when her daughter lashed out at her after she urged her to eat a small amount of food. Crying and unable to sleep, Lucy posted to the group in the middle of the night in desperation.
“Suddenly dozens of people all over the world who knew what I was going through are telling me — ‘You’ll get through this’ — it made a huge difference,” she said. “It also helps me when I can help other people. Because there is such a stigma around this disease, and this can be such a lonely road.”
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS