Some people in the pan-blue camp have recently found a new subject to pick on, namely that the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) promotes “desinicization” of the education system, with the result that young people no longer know who Sun Yat-sen (孫逸仙) is.
As a school teacher, I can assure the public that this is a baseless accusation.
The most recent versions of textbooks still include Sun, as well as Yue Fei (岳飛) — a Southern Song Dynasty general immortalized for his loyalty to the emperor and country — although some, obviously left-leaning, textbooks present an odd interpretation of Yue Fei’s role.
One true thing in their complaints is that the class hours for social studies have been reduced, but this is a problem related to increased teaching pressure, and has nothing to do with desinicization.
However, the rhetoric used by many people responding to the accusations are also hackneyed cliches, such as that the history of China is the history of a foreign country that has nothing to do with Taiwan.
A new academic viewpoint is to view history as “global history” rather than “national history,” which countries have adopted to serve certain purposes.
Take for example, Charles Le Gendre, who is portrayed in the TV miniseries Seqalu: Formosa 1867 (斯卡羅). He was a French-born US officer and diplomat who served as adviser to the Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs from 1872 to 1875 and as adviser to Korean Emperor Gojong from 1890 to 1899.
The question is whether he is a part of the history of Taiwan, China, Japan or the US? In all cases, the answer is both yes and no.
History is intertwined and interconnected throughout the world. Moreover, history can in many cases transcend time and space, and touch people’s hearts.
For Christians like me, Jesus is certainly the most important historical figure.
When responding to accusations from pan-blue camp figures, it is important to recognize that all knowledge has value, but we should not demand that everyone understand it.
We are humans — and therefore, human medicine is important, and ergonomics is also important.
Why do people sneeze? Why can people not lift themselves off the floor? If young people cannot answer those questions, will we accuse the government of “fighting science”?
If a piece of knowledge makes a person feel something, then it is useful; if it does not, it is useless.
Sun Yat-sen is included in school textbooks, but if children do not remember him, it just means that his story did not move them.
People can of course tell children about Sun as many times as they like, but they should not forget that education does not only take place in school.
Chang Jim-way is a junior-high school teacher.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS