While Taiwan is enjoying steady economic growth thanks to stable exports and domestic investment, its consumer price index (CPI) is also increasing, due to rising prices for vegetables, fruit, meat, imported fuel and airfare.
Last week, the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) reported that the CPI last month rose 2.63 percent year-on-year — the highest increase since March 2013. In the first nine months of this year, the index exceeded the government’s 2 percent target during four months, raising concerns of accelerated price pressure.
However, over the whole nine months, the CPI only rose 1.74 percent, and the DGBAS said that last month’s increase was mainly due to a higher comparison basis in the same month last year, as well as increased consumption related to the Mid-Autumn Festival holiday, implying a deceleration in the inflation reading’s increase.
As many daily necessities have become more expensive, the public has reason for concern. For example, among the costs that the government found most concerning, the prices of 17 essential household items last month soared 3.31 percent annually — the highest in three years — with the prices of pork, soy sauce, cooking oil and toothpaste rising more than 5 percent.
Core CPI — which excludes items with especially volatile prices, such as food and energy — showed a stronger-than-expected rise last month, gaining 1.74 percent from a year earlier, the biggest annual increase since March 2018.
As core CPI is a major gauge of inflationary risk and indicates trends in consumer prices, its continued increase after rising 1.24 percent in July and 1.32 percent in August suggests that inflationary risk is building and that price pressure is expanding to non-volatile consumer goods.
The rising energy costs in last month’s index signaled that Taiwan is experiencing the effects of imported inflation. The government should carefully monitor whether the upturn in domestic inflation persists or even gains traction.
Over the past few months, import prices have risen by about 20 percent annually — the highest in nearly 10 years — driven by soaring prices for raw materials. This signals that the government also needs to monitor import prices to better address inflationary pressure on consumer prices.
The government can attempt to rein in imported inflation by pushing up the value of the New Taiwan dollar or demanding that state-run companies — such as CPC Corp, Taiwan, or Taiwan Power Co — partly absorb cost increases.
However, household expenses for water, electricity, liquefied natural gas and liquefied petroleum gas only make up 20 percent of the CPI. The remaining 80 percent is directly or indirectly affected by international energy prices, with the degree of the impact depending on market competition, as well as supply and demand.
While efforts to reduce carbon emissions have countries worldwide shifting from coal to natural gas, soaring coal and natural gas prices in China and Europe have produced an electricity crisis, with high prices or insufficient supply. As crude oil, coal and natural gas are crucial to the global energy supply — accounting for 31 percent, 27 percent and 23 percent respectively, according to Bloomberg data — energy-stoked inflation could accelerate if supply cannot be significantly increased in the short term.
It remains to be seen whether the surge in energy prices will trigger a new global energy crisis, but to the global economy, the surge could be a “black swan” event — something that cannot be predicted, but has profound consequences on markets — with inflationary pressure worldwide reaching a critical mass and producing the most devastating black swan of the post-COVID-19 pandemic period.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not