First there was writer Wu Tan-ju (吳淡如) who lamented that the “desinicization” of the education system resulted in his daughter and her classmates not knowing who “the father of the nation,” Sun Yat-sen (孫逸仙), was.
Then media personality Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康) said that Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘) had told him that Gou’s daughter did not know who Yue Fei (岳飛) — a 12th-century Chinese general — was.
Citing these two cases, Jaw criticized the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) for what he said were the party’s desinicization efforts and said that its “historical obscurantist policy” would be ridiculed by future historians.
However, the history of the Qing Dynasty’s rule over Taiwan and Sun’s revolution is fully related in elementary-school social studies textbooks. Second-year junior-high school history books also explain that the Jin Dynasty continued to advance southward, but was blocked by Yue Fei of the Southern Song Dynasty.
That children do not know those two historical figures has nothing to do with desinicization, but is the result of boredom — the old guys in the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) are still trying to impose the “educational boredom” they suffered on today’s children.
In the past, the KMT’s “Great China” mindset forced everyone to memorize useless eras, recite the order of long lists of dynasties, and remember where the capitals of the Xia, Shang, Western Zhou, and Eastern Zhou dynasties were, while little was taught about contemporary Taiwan.
History should teach us to criticize and reflect. The 12-year national education history curriculum pays less attention to the long bygone past and focuses more on events nearer to the present to motivate students to learn about history using materials that interest them.
If the children of this generation are not doing any worse than former generations — who had to memorize this boring Chinese history — Wu, Jaw and Gou will not need to worry.
How, for example, is Yue Fei taught in Hong Kong and China? In the Starlight series of moral education materials for Hong Kong’s Catholic elementary schools, the religious curriculum is designed to instill a patriotic spirit in children by claiming that Chinese culture is a gift from God and that they should be thankful to God for making them Chinese. Even Yue Fei’s loyalty and dedication to his nation is described as a response to the call of God.
Chinese textbooks go one step further. In the 2016 Chinese history textbook for seventh graders, Yue Fei is “reborn” as a national hero — because the old history textbook explained why Yue Fei was no hero. When it comes to history, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has the final say.
The government should learn from the CCP how to go about its “historical obscurantist policy.”
The government should portray Sun Yat-sen as the godfather of Taiwanese independence, and use Yue Fei’s loyalty to echo the idea of Taiwanese sovereignty and independence.
If it could brainwash just one generation in this way, there would no longer be any “high-class Chinese” bad-mouthing Taiwan, while the nation feeds and pays them.
Chin Ching is an educator.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers