The discussions referred to as the “2+2 talks” are usually meetings between two military allies or countries with similar political philosophies, each sending foreign affairs and defense ministers to address cooperation in areas of mutual interest. Such sensitive meetings usually garner international attention.
In the past year, many countries have been holding such talks, and they all have one thing in common: a focus on security in the Taiwan Strait and the threat posed by China. This phenomenon shows that Taiwan has become an essential concern for the international community.
On Sept. 16, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken and US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin held the 31st US-Australia 2+2 Talks in Washington with visiting Australian Minister of Foreign Affairs Marise Payne and Australian Minister for Defense Peter Dutton.
In a joint statement after the meeting, the two countries emphasized the important role Taiwan plays in the Indo-Pacific region, and said that the US and Australia plan to strengthen their relationship with Taiwan and support its meaningful participation in international affairs.
At the US-Japan 2+2 talks in Tokyo on March 16, the two countries signed a joint document that, among other things, recognized the importance of peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait.
At the US-Korea 2+2 talks in Seoul on March 18, Blinken publicly condemned China’s provocative actions in the Indo-Pacific region and said that the US would increase countermeasures against China.
On March 31, Japan and Indonesia held 2+2 talks in Tokyo, during which the two countries agreed to strengthen security cooperation to contain China’s attempts to expand its maritime activities.
It is not surprising that Australia, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, the US and other countries would hold these meetings, but similar talks among Germany, France and other EU nations have deeper strategic implications.
They are an indication that Europe is also willing to stand up for Taiwan and take part in the “joint resistance” against China.
For example, on April 13, Germany and Japan held their first 2+2 talks via videoconference. Both sides expressed serious concern about China’s movements in the East China Sea and South China Sea over the past few years, and Japan’s Self-Defense Forces are to conduct joint drills with German frigates.
On Aug. 30, France and Australia held 2+2 talks, also by videoconference, for the first time mentioning the Taiwan issue, and expressing support for Taiwan’s participation in international organizations to bolster global cooperation.
Taiwan’s strategic position is important, and the more unstable the situation becomes in the Taiwan Strait, the more forcefully the global community is likely to act to maintain security in the western Pacific.
Additionally, Taiwan can take the initiative to set up direct communication channels with countries around the world to reinforce regional military and security cooperation.
The first “quasi-2+2 talks” between the ruling parties of Taiwan and Japan on Aug. 28 was an example that could serve as a model for such initiatives.
Taiwan should promote talks on strategic cooperation that contribute to regional stability and security, and enhance international visibility of its issues.
Yao Chung-yuan is a professor and former deputy director of the Ministry of National Defense’s strategic planning department.
Translated by Perry Svensson
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS