China’s central bank on Friday declared all transactions involving cryptocurrencies illegal, saying that virtual currencies would disrupt the economic and financial order, facilitate criminal activities and jeopardize the safety of people’s assets. Over the past few months, several Chinese provinces had already ordered cryptominers to shut down their operations, citing their strain on the energy supply.
China’s crackdown on cryptocurrency trading and mining comes as digital currencies, including bitcoin, ethereum and dogecoin, have become mainstream investment targets. Few would dispute that, from the perspective of central banks and governments, cryptocurrencies pose a threat to financial stability, and they all want control over the digital currencies to manage risk, volatility and uncertainty.
US Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Gary Gensler in an interview with the Washington Post on Tuesday said he feared a lack of oversight of trading cryptocurrencies would hurt US investors, while raising doubt over the long-term viability for various private forms of money in the market. Gensler compared cryptocurrencies to the “wildcat banking” era of the mid-19th century, when private banknotes dominated the US economy, generating problems and costs, and necessitating greater regulatory oversight and consumer protections.
The unregulated financial system created by trading cryptocurrencies poses a clear danger for the Chinese government and US authorities. That might not be the case for El Salvador, which on Sept. 7 became the first nation to adopt bitcoin as legal tender, creating the largest testing ground for cryptocurrencies. The move has drawn doubt, curiosity and even excitement inside and outside the Central American country, as people want to know whether a digital currency can transition from a niche asset to an official monetary unit.
In Taiwan, cryptocurrencies are viewed as commodities. The central bank and the Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) in 2013 issued a joint statement saying that digital currencies, such as bitcoin, are “highly speculative virtual commodities,” and the commission in the same year directed local banks not to accept or exchange bitcoins, or provide any bitcoin-related services at automated teller machines.
In 2018, Taiwan passed amendments to the Money Laundering Control Act (洗錢防制法), which included an article allowing the government to regulate virtual currency platforms and trading businesses as financial institutions. From July 1, new money laundering regulations require cryptocurrency exchanges in Taiwan to conduct proper know-your-customer procedures and report transactions exceeding NT$500,000 to prevent money laundering.
Although cryptocurrency trading has become an alternative method for investors in Taiwan to accumulate capital, the financial industry’s attitude toward virtual currencies remains cautious and conservative. The government has often warned of the volatility of cryptocurrencies, saying they carry risks much higher than equities or gold. Despite the FSC having created a mechanism for security token offerings — which allows companies, and start-ups in particular, to issue virtual tokens and raise funds — such practices are still subject to the Securities and Exchange Act (證券交易法), and the government’s stance is to manage the tokens as a financing tool for firms rather than a means to make money for investors.
Unlike China, Taiwan would not ban cryptocurrency trading and mining, nor would it adopt bitcoin as legal tender. While the number of cryptocurrency platforms and exchanges that provide services related to virtual currencies has grown in Taiwan since 2014, the FSC is likely to continue taking a gradual approach in developing a legal framework for the industry against the relentless volatility and evolution of cryptocurrency markets.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers