The US Open women’s singles champion, 18-year-old Briton Emma Raducanu — the “British Rainie Yang” (楊丞琳) — has gained a huge fan following, not just for her impressive tennis skills, but for her looks, too. In the immediate aftermath of her US Open victory, Raducanu’s star soared, and she has become the best spokesperson for British multiculturalism.
During interviews, the new US Open champion spoke in fluent Mandarin, thanking the Chinese-speaking world for its support. Perhaps even more surprisingly, she also said that she loved watching Taiwanese television programs, attracting attention to her interest in the culture.
In these interviews, spoken in Mandarin and English, the world became aware of the cultural diversity that she represents. It is clear that she shall be the focus of much attention in both the UK and the Chinese-speaking world.
In this globalized environment, multilingualism has long been a necessary skill. Nowadays, in the four Grand Slam tennis tournaments, it is becoming increasingly common at the end of each match for the host to interview the winner on court in front of the spectators.
They talk about how they performed, sometimes in their mother tongue, but primarily using English.
When the audio and visuals of tennis players are broadcast around the world, it is not just their tennis skills and their match performance that is on display — the players also become a symbol and a representative of the values of their country and their culture.
Raducanu’s success is perhaps a testament to the value of pushing ahead with a bilingual country policy. She has shown that the ability to transcend culture and language is a potent weapon for competitiveness, and having this capacity opens up many kinds of possibilities for exposure and influence.
Tao Yi-che is a teacher at Affiliated High School of National Chengchi University.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath