Anxious not to displease its masters in Beijing, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has for many years adopted a robust stance against Taiwanese independence and frequently attacked the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) for promoting sovereignty. As the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) purge of the nation’s artists, celebrities and entertainers continues apace, a loophole in the KMT’s cross-strait policy has been exposed that the party cannot afford to ignore: the Republic of China (ROC) and Taiwanese independence are one and the same.
The media have reported that Taiwanese actress Janine Chang (張鈞甯) is the latest victim of the purge after her master’s degree thesis, titled “The legal issues regarding management of entertainers’ agents in our nation,” was dug up by Internet users and examined with a fine-tooth comb.
The thesis refers to Taiwan variously as “our nation” (wo guo, 我國) and the “ROC” (Zhonghua Minguo, 中華民國). Chinese Internet users have seized this as supposed evidence that Chang supports Taiwanese independence. They are now attempting to destroy her career, although Chang has said she has “no view on independence.”
The vexatious attack on Chang indicates an intensification of the polarization of the unification versus independence debate; anything short of unification now equates to independence. In the eyes of Chinese, any text or expression other than the People’s Republic of China (PRC) means Taiwanese independence, regardless of whether the term used is the “Republic of China” or the “Republic of Taiwan.”
Given the changing of the goalposts, this raises a question: Will the KMT still dare continue to advocate for the ROC? Since the ROC means Taiwanese independence, will the KMT come over to the side of justice and righteousness, dispense with its unrealistic “China dream” and get behind Taiwanese sovereignty?
Taiwan is a liberal democracy with an independent and sovereign populace, territory and system of government; it is evidently a different country from China. After World War II, Japan merely renounced “all right, title and claim” to Taiwan and the Penghu archipelago. The only reason that Taiwan was founded by the former government of China is that it was asked to administer it under the Allied powers’ system of trusteeship.
According to the ROC Constitution, the ROC is the legitimate government of China and this is precisely why Taiwan faces the “united front” threat from China and why the nation’s status remains unsettled to this day. It is also why Taiwan needs to normalize its status.
Since every term except the PRC now means Taiwanese independence, the KMT might as well ditch its anti-independence stance as well as its support for the so-called “1992 consensus,” which long ago was exposed as a “united front” mechanism. Taiwanese should put aside their differences and work together to achieve independence, either by revising the Constitution or by creating a new one.
Pan Kuan was a participant in the Sunflower movement.
Translated by Edward Jones
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) chairman Mark Liu (劉德音) said in an interview with CNN on Sunday that a Chinese invasion of Taiwan would render the company’s plants inoperable, and that such a war would produce “no winners.” Not only would Taiwan’s economy be destroyed in a cross-strait conflict, but the impact “would go well beyond semiconductors, and would bring about the destruction of the world’s rules-based order and totally change the geopolitical landscape,” Liu said in the interview, according to the Central News Agency. Bloomberg columnist Hal Brands wrote on June 24: “A major war over Taiwan could create global economic
Amid a fervor in the global media, US House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her congressional delegation made a high-profile visit to Taipei. President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) awarded a state honor to her at the Presidential Office. Evidently, the occasion took on the aspect of an inter-state relationship between the US and the Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan, despite no mutual state recognition between the two. Beijing furiously condemned Pelosi’s visit in advance, with military drills in the waters surrounding coastal China to check the move. Pelosi is a well-known China hawk, and second in the line of succession to
Washington’s official position on US House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan is that nothing has changed: The US government says it is maintaining its “one China” policy, that Pelosi is free to arrange international trips with congressional delegations independent of the government and that she is not the first US official to visit Taiwan even this year. Yet there is no denying that the fact and the optics of the second-in-line to the US presidency speaking with lawmakers at the Legislative Yuan about inter-parliamentary discussions and learning from each other as equals are hugely significant, as were
A stark contrast in narratives about China’s future is emerging inside and outside of China. This is partly a function of the dramatic constriction in the flow of people and ideas into and out of China, owing to China’s COVID-19 quarantine requirements. There also are fewer foreign journalists in China to help the outside world make sense of developments. Those foreign journalists and diplomats who are in China often are limited in where they can travel and who they can meet. There also is tighter technological control over information inside China than at any point since the dawn of the
RSS