Shortly before he died in 2007, the celebrated US novelist, iconoclast and World War II veteran Kurt Vonnegut gave a final interview.
“My country is in ruins,” he said. “I’m a fish in a poisoned fishbowl.”
Vonnegut was 84, and sounded razor sharp as he spoke about inequality and political shortsightedness, adding that in the history of the US “one thing that no Cabinet has ever had is a secretary of the future, and there are no plans at all for my children and grandchildren.”
“Why should I care about future generations?” the comedian Groucho Marx asked. “What have they ever done for me?”
The future is all downstream. Marty McFly and Doc Brown took us on a great ride in the movie Back to the Future, using their flux capacitor and a flying DeLorean — but time goes only one way, and money cannot buy it.
On the other hand, gratitude goes in a circle.
“In a culture of gratitude, everyone knows that gifts will follow the circle of reciprocity and flow back to you again,” Robin Wall Kimmerer writes in her book Braiding Sweetgrass.
Kimmerer, an enrolled member of the Citizen Potawatomi Nation, adds that “both the honor of giving and the humility of receiving are necessary halves of the equation.”
This should be people’s task: To put the intergenerational “We” above today’s “Me,” and create community through generosity.
To write a Declaration of Interdependence that reminds people to care for each other, to listen; to elect leaders who are motivated by empathy, honesty, science, wisdom and truth, not by power and greed.
There should be no more conspiracy theories, shortsightedness, fossil-fuel subsidies or trillion-dollar unwinnable wars. There should be no more lies.
“The Department of the Future would set in motion a realignment of priorities in all aspects of society,” says geology professor Marcia Bjornerud in her book Timefulness. “Resource conservation would again become a core value and patriotic virtue. Tax incentives and subsidies would be rebalanced to reward long-term stewardship over short-term exploitation.”
Every year, the Global Footprint Network calculates the number of days when humanity’s demand for ecological resources and services exceeds what the Earth can regenerate in a year.
This year, Earth Overshoot Day came on July 29, meaning that humans are on track to consume 1.6 Earths rather than have a sustainable one.
Last year, in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, it came on Aug. 22, three weeks later than in 2019, proving that people can reduce their global carbon footprint and ecological burden.
Back in the 1970s, Earth Overshoot Day fell in December, when people largely lived within their means and did not rob the future.
SUSTAINABILITY
By encouraging higher education and imposing sensible regulations, a Department of the Future would help to incentivize a deeper morality, instead of greed and a preoccupation with Now. Composed of scientists, humanists, historians and Aboriginal elders, it would beckon people to climb a higher peak than the Mountain of More.
The department would end, or at least mitigate, what the author Naomi Klein calls the “intergenerational theft” of anthropogenic climate change, and in its place, develop a blueprint for green energy revolution and regeneration that makes fossil fuels obsolete. It is not without precedent.
About 300 years ago, the Iroquois required their leaders to take into account how their actions would affect the “unborn of the future Nation.” This “seventh generation rule” looked equally far into the past as it did into the future, from one’s great-grandparents to one’s great-grandchildren — a perspective of about 150 years.
For too long, humans have been shortsighted and mistaken cleverness for wisdom. As a result, many of their solutions have later become vexing problems: non-biodegradable microfibers ingested by fish everywhere, plastics filling the stomachs of sea turtles and whales that starve to death, lead-based paints and other compounds that sicken and kill children, cancerous “forever chemicals” in the ground water and sunscreens that bleach coral reefs. All were regarded as wondrous until time gave people clarity and a cause for alarm, changing the equation.
UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres calls the latest report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change a “code red for humanity.”
The main culprit: people’s addiction to fossil fuels.
This is why US President Biden, facing severe threats to Americans’ democracy and their livable Earth, must do what has never been done. He must look deeper into the past and clearer into the future than any US president ever has.
He must summon the lessons of history and the progress paradox, listen to science, create jobs (so far so good) and improve the lives of as many Americans as possible. To accomplish this, he must employ wisdom, science, decency, hope and truth — and more than a little grit.
“The future depends on what you do today,” Gandhi said.
By taking a hard look at humanity’s troubled past, and learning from it, people can create a Department of the Future that will help them to achieve the long view. Escaping shortsightedness will make people better caretakers of democracy, the planet and their great-grandchildren’s tomorrows.
The future is out there, looking back and asking people — begging them — to see beyond themselves.
Kim Heacox is an author and National Outdoor Book Award winner.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US