The TV drama Seqalu: Formosa 1867 (斯卡羅), directed by Tsao Jui-yuan (曹瑞原) and adapted from Chen Yao-chang’s (陳耀昌) novel Kui Lei Hua (傀儡花), has created considerable interest in the history of the Aboriginal Puyuma and Paiwan peoples since it premiered on Public Television Service.
Increased interest in the history of Aborigines told from their own viewpoint is always a good thing, and there are too many tragic events in Aboriginal history that need to be addressed.
Take the Bunun people’s Bulbul community in Taitung County’s Haiduan Township (海端) for example: An ancient cannon in the community has witnessed many changes in the world and the sadness of the community.
Although dubbed the “ancient cannon of Bulbul,” the weapon did not originally belong to the community. Rather, it was deployed by Japanese colonial troops to intimidate the residents. The cannon was first deployed in Hualien County’s Batongguan (八通關) area during Japan’s campaign to control Taiwanese Aborigines.
At that time, the Japanese colonial government seized the weapons of Aborigines, who were deeply offended, as it made hunting very difficult. Disputes between colonial police and Aborigines eventually triggered a series of bloody conflicts.
The 1914 Bulbul Incident happened during the Bunun people’s anti-Japanese movement. Although the incident appears to have had a clear outcome, too many questions remain.
The most notorious incident between Japanese and Aborigines is perhaps the 1930 Wushe Incident in Nantou County, on which the 2011 epic film Seediq Bale, directed by Wei Te-sheng (魏德聖), is based. Although Japanese troops suppressed the local community with heavy weapons, they failed to subdue them.
In 1932, the Bunun people once again took up arms to resist the Japanese in the Daguanshan Incident in Taitung County, and the colonial government sent several big cannons to the area to deter the Bunun.
Those cannons have an impressive background: Originally used by the Russian Empire during the Russo-Japanese War, those then-state-of-the-art weapons were seized by Japan after Russia surrendered in 1905.
Eventually, one of the cannons was in 1945 left behind on the Batongguan Historic Trail (八通關古道) in the mountains of Taitung County, when Japan withdrew from Taiwan after its defeat in World War II.
The site is now a tourist spot with historical significance.
Tracing the background of the cannon is not difficult. However, what really happened during the Bulbul and Daguanshan incidents is not entirely clear.
In particular, the Bunun people say that Japanese troops used traps to initiate a “massacre” during the Bulbul Incident, while Japanese documents show that the troops were protecting the community from other Aboriginal peoples.
That there are two diametrically opposed interpretations of the incident makes one wonder if one side is trying to cover the historical truth. The ancient cannon of Bulbul is a reminder that we must not forget to strive for the historical truth.
Weber Lai is a professor in National Taiwan University of Arts’ radio and television department.
Translated by Eddy Chang
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
Taiwan People’s Party Legislator-at-large Liu Shu-pin (劉書彬) asked Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) a question on Tuesday last week about President William Lai’s (賴清德) decision in March to officially define the People’s Republic of China (PRC), as governed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), as a foreign hostile force. Liu objected to Lai’s decision on two grounds. First, procedurally, suggesting that Lai did not have the right to unilaterally make that decision, and that Cho should have consulted with the Executive Yuan before he endorsed it. Second, Liu objected over national security concerns, saying that the CCP and Chinese President Xi
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS