The Annual Threat Assessment report published by the US Office of the Director of National Intelligence on April 9 says that China’s power is spreading around the globe, and that its influence has expanded to military capabilities, space, the Internet and intelligence. while increasing military activities around Taiwan.
To maintain national security and prevent sensitive technology and personal assets from being stolen by China, countries such as the US, Canada and Japan, as well as European nations, have enacted legislation to strengthen the review of overseas investments by Chinese companies.
On the other hand, the Taiwanese government, especially the Ministry of Economic Affairs’ Investment Commission, has repeatedly neglected its duty to screen Chinese investments that disguise China’s aim to infiltrate Taiwan using mergers and acquisitions. Letting them get away with it is heartbreaking.
The following examples are proof: A report published by US think tank the Project 2049 Institute said that the Chinese state-owned company China Ocean Shipping Co (COSCO) acquired Orient Overseas Container Line (OOCL) in 2018, and then leased a Port of Kaohsiung terminal under the name of OOCL. This gives COSCO access to and control over important port facilities, and is a detriment to Taiwan’s national security.
The other example is that of Science Park Logistics Co (SPL). Originally a partly public company, SPL is now controlled by Chinese capital. It was established in 1998, with Taiwan Sugar Corp and China Airlines as majority shareholders. SPL is tasked with transporting high-tech products and preventing the leakage of business secrets and confidential information. Therefore, it enjoys preferential tax rates and exclusive access to land for warehousing.
From 2017 to 2018, through a series of manipulative equity transactions, SPL fell into the hands of Chinese-funded Kerry TJ Logistics Co (KTJ), which controls most of SPL’s shares and operating rights.
In February, Hong Kong Kerry Logistics Network, the parent company of Taiwan’s KTJ, said that it would be acquired by China’s SF Express, which would control Taiwan’s KTJ and deepen cooperation between Taiwan, Hong Kong and China.
The government must urgently follow the practices of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), which is similar to the Investment Commission.
The US passed the Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act (FIRRMA) in 2018, expanding the act’s authority to review mergers and acquisitions by foreign companies — especially Chinese investments — to prevent harm to US companies, the national economy and military security.
FIRRMA increases the scope of CFIUS’ jurisdiction to include: sensitive real-estate transactions, such as property located near US military bases or sensitive government agencies, or near airports or sea ports; transactions that alter the rights of foreigners in US companies, such as the number of board seats; companies that design transactions to avoid CFIUS supervision; and cases that allow foreigners to obtain important sensitive, non-public technology or infrastructure designs.
Additionally, FIRRMA extends the initial review period from 30 days to 45 days. If any part of a transaction is related to a list of 27 key industries — including communications, semiconductors, telecommunications, and aircraft manufacturing, involving engine parts, computer storage devices and military equipment such as missiles — that must be proactively declared within 45 days, otherwise the CFIUS can levy a fine equal to 1 percent of the transaction value or US$300,000.
Yu Hsing-pang is a university professor based in Taipei.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers