The contest between Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Johnny Chiang (江啟臣) and former KMT chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) in the party’s upcoming chairperson election has once again put the spotlight on the KMT.
However, if the party cannot rid itself of its three main problems — factional manipulation, members’ selfishness and lack of strength to fight election battles — it will likely find it difficult to reignite supporters’ passions — no matter how badly the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) performs.
The influence of the KMT’s factions and even its connections to organized crime have always been the party’s Achilles’ heel.
Using the slogan “transition of power, clean out ‘black gold,’” then-DPP presidential candidate Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) defeated the KMT to become president in 2000. Although factional manipulation has weakened after several power transfers, factions still have influence in the KMT’s internal elections.
A media report said that controversial local faction leaders are attempting to ally themselves with stronger candidates in the party’s chairperson election to regain control of party resources. If true, the public is likely to be disgusted with the comeback of factional KMT politics. This would also alarm swing voters, and factional power struggles could even shake the party’s support base.
Selfishness is also a long-standing problem among KMT heavyweights.
In 2019, then-KMT chairman Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) allegedly urged Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘) and then-Kaohsiung mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) to take part in the party’s presidential primary to block Chu’s presidential bid. True or not, the move ruined the party’s favorable position.
To avoid repeating the same scenario, Chiang has pledged not to run for president in 2024, saying that he is planning to act as a “kingmaker.”
Given the circumstances, Chu has been forced to name New Taipei Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), Broadcasting Corp of China chairman Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康) and Han as potential KMT presidential candidates, excluding himself from the list.
Chu is trying to avoid speculation about a potential presidential bid by naming other potential candidates, but manipulation has put those being named in an awkward situation. Former Changhua County commissioner Cho Po-yuan (卓伯源), one of the four candidates for KMT chairperson, even claimed that Chu wants to run for president more than anyone, demanding that he clearly denounce a presidential bid in 2024, which highlights the KMT heavyweights’ selfishness.
Recovering combative power in election battles is another urgent matter for the KMT. Today, the party’s mayors and county commissioners do not necessarily take orders from their chairman. Besides, following major defeats in legislative elections in 2016 and last year, the loss of legislative seats has weakened the chairperson’s role.
This shows that the party remains reluctant to hand the baton to young and middle-aged members.
Over the past few months, the 60-year-old Chu has repeatedly criticized 49-year-old Chiang’s leadership. His criticism might sound reasonable at first, but even if Chu is elected KMT chairman, he would likely be unable to reverse the party’s weakness in the legislature.
Additionally, the party’s local leaders — whose influence has grown — might not necessarily take orders from him either. This means that it is no longer possible for a KMT chairperson to become a strong leader. Simply feeling good about oneself is not enough to rebuild the party’s strength.
Niu Tse-hsun is a professor in Chinese Culture University’s advertising department.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Speaking at the Asia-Pacific Forward Forum in Taipei, former Singaporean minister for foreign affairs George Yeo (楊榮文) proposed a “Chinese commonwealth” as a potential framework for political integration between Taiwan and China. Yeo said the “status quo” in the Taiwan Strait is unsustainable and that Taiwan should not be “a piece on the chessboard” in a geopolitical game between China and the US. Yeo’s remark is nothing but an ill-intentioned political maneuver that is made by all pro-China politicians in Singapore. Since when does a Southeast Asian nation have the right to stick its nose in where it is not wanted
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has released a plan to economically integrate China’s Fujian Province with Taiwan’s Kinmen County, outlining a cross-strait development project based on six major themes and 21 measures. This official document by the CCP is directed toward Taiwan’s three outlying island counties: Penghu County, Lienchiang County (Matsu) and Kinmen County. The plan sets out to construct a cohabiting sphere between Kinmen and the nearby Chinese city of Xiamen, as well as between Matsu and Fuzhou. It also aims to bring together Minnanese cultural areas including Taiwan’s Penghu and China’s cities of Quanzhou and Zhangzhou for further integrated
During a recent visit to Taiwan, I encountered repeated questions about “America skepticism” among the body politic. The basic premise of the “America skepticism” theory is that Taiwan people should view the United States as an unreliable, self-interested actor who is using Taiwan for its own purposes. According to this theory, America will abandon Taiwan when its interests are advanced by doing so. At one level, such skepticism is a sign of a healthy, well-functioning democratic society that protects the right for vigorous political debate. Indeed, around the world, the people of Taiwan are far from alone in debating America’s reliability
As China’s economy was meant to drive global economic growth this year, its dramatic slowdown is sounding alarm bells across the world, with economists and experts criticizing Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) for his unwillingness or inability to respond to the nation’s myriad mounting crises. The Wall Street Journal reported that investors have been calling on Beijing to take bolder steps to boost output — especially by promoting consumer spending — but Xi has deep-rooted philosophical objections to Western-style consumption-driven growth, seeing it as wasteful and at odds with his goal of making China a world-leading industrial and technological powerhouse, and