The past few months have made for a strange chapter in Taiwan’s hydrological history, as reservoirs parched as recently as June are overflowing due to the heavy rains of the past few weeks.
During the recent unprecedented low water levels in reservoirs nationwide, the government mobilized a special task force to assist in clearing out sediment clogging the reservoirs in the hope that this would increase storage capacity.
Taiwan’s reservoirs have changed over the past two decades. The 921 Earthquake of 1999 loosened soil in the mountains, causing landslides; Typhoon Mindulle in July 2004 dumped torrential rainfall in central Taiwan, causing the highest levels of sedimentation Taichung’s Deji Reservoir (德基水庫) had ever seen; the next month, Typhoon Aere drenched Taoyuan with 970mm of rain in a single day, causing landslides upstream of the Shihmen Reservoir (石門水庫), filling it with sediment and reducing its storage capacity by 27 million tonnes; Typhoon Morakot in 2009 hit southern Taiwan, unleashing 17 million cubic meters of sediment into the Nanhua Reservoir (南化水庫), reducing its water capacity by more than one-third.
When I first visited Nanhua Reservoir in 2016, managers there told me that this event had been a severe blow for the reservoir. Taiwan Water Corp (Taiwater) had commissioned National Chiao Tung University Disaster Prevention and Water Environment Research Center to examine the sediment it accumulated and perform 3D imaging of the reservoir’s bottom.
The simplest way to restore capacity levels when turbidity currents — sediment-laden dense flows along the reservoir bottom — appear, or when the water is sediment-laden but approaching capacity level, is to open up the bottom outlets and release the water at high pressure.
The costliest method would be to dredge the upper and middle reaches of the river during a water shortage and to send the dredged sediment by truck to a landfill. Sediment is of no use or value, and the reservoirs are all at high altitudes, making transportation difficult, costing NT$250 to NT$400 (US$8.92 to US$14.28) per tonne to transport, with no means to recoup the money. Other problems include public disturbance from laden trucks shuttling back and forth, and landfills being difficult to find.
In March 2017, I accompanied President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) to the Zengwen Reservoir (曾文水庫) to observe the Water Resources Agency’s work in the three most silted-up reservoirs — Shihmen, Zengwen and Nanhua — for sediment bypassing projects that routed incoming sediment around or through the dam to minimize sediment deposition. At almost NT$10 billion for the work, it was an expensive way to control sediment accumulation.
For more than a decade, the Shihmen, Zenghua, Nanhua and Mudan (牡丹水庫) reservoirs have been using sand dredgers to extract sediment. Taiwater rates have remained low for a long time. To increase profit, the company has been improving this process, with the rate of solids per weight increasing from 10 percent to almost 30 percent.
The second time I visited the Nanhua Reservoir, it was full, and I advised management to make use of the capacity to open the bottom outlets and flush out the sediment using pressure from the water’s weight.
Taiwater’s annual plan for 2017 was to flush out 100,000 tonnes of sediment from the Nanhua Reservoir, and I asked my colleagues to open the gates and flush out 1 million tonnes over a 24-hour period, regardless of the cost, so long as the reservoir was almost at full capacity. Consequently, the Nanhua Reservoir was able to expunge as much as 6.7 million tonnes over the course of the year, the most on record.
I told my colleagues that this was the new way forward. So long as the extraction rate was sufficiently high, and it was conducted when there was plentiful rainfall and the water levels were high, increasing the speed at which the sediment would be flushed out, there would be an opportunity to achieve a balance between the amount of sediment coming in and the amount being flushed out.
Taiwan is likely to experience a lot of rain this year, and all the major reservoirs plan to increase the deployment of dredgers. They should at the same time open the bottom outlets to flush out sediment, rather than let the dams overflow. This will extend the lives of the dams.
Kuo Chun-ming is chairman of the Chinese Taiwan Water Works Association and a former president of Taiwan Water Corp.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers