Autumn Blum was 5m underwater, scuba diving off the Pacific islands of Palau, when she looked up toward the surface and saw a rainbow.
“I thought maybe it had been raining,” she said. “As I got closer, I saw that it wasn’t a rainbow: It was actually an oily sheen that was coming off a group of snorkelers.”
She realized the iridescent slick must have come from the snorkelers’ sunscreen.
Illustration: Yusha
“When I got back on the boat, I picked up the closest bottle of sunscreen and was reading the ingredients,” she said.
As well as being an experienced diver, Blum is a cosmetics scientist who has created natural product brands.
These were ingredients she would never put in her own products, “and yet here we were using these ingredients in the most sensitive marine environment in the world.”
Sunscreen is essential to protect skin against cancer, and with many travel restrictions related to COVID-19 starting to lift around the world, sales are expected to rocket.
However, in the past few years it has also come under scrutiny for being potentially toxic to the environment — especially the oceans in which sunscreen-slathered tourists swim.
Estimates vary about how much sunscreen makes it into our oceans each year. Cinzia Corinaldesi, associate professor of ecology at the Polytechnic University of Marche in Ancona, Italy, has estimated that 20,000 tonnes is washed off tourists every year in the northern Mediterranean alone, while Craig Downs, another leading researcher and the executive director of nonprofit scientific organization Haereticus Environmental Laboratory, thinks that between 6,000 and 14,000 tonnes are released in coral reef areas each year.
The focus has been on two chemicals, the ultraviolet (UV) filters oxybenzone and octinoxate, although there are other troubling ingredients. Hawaii banned those UV filters from January this year, and Palau in 2018 announced broader restrictions on sunscreens containing a number of chemicals. Other regions have similar bans.
However, with switched-on consumers seeking out “reef-friendly” brands that, in the absence of any strict definition, might or might not be reef-friendly, and some marine experts saying that the negative effects of sunscreen have been overstated or do not exist, there is huge scope for confusion.
Corinaldesi is one of the scientists convinced of the toxicity of many sunscreens. She has been studying the effect of sunscreen on marine environments since the early 2000s.
“We were inspired by the fact that in Mexico, at the cenotes [natural swimming holes], it was forbidden to use sunscreen products before diving into the water,” she said. “Mexicans had noticed that [it affected] the delicate life forms of these fragile ecosystems.”
Corinaldesi and her marine biologist colleagues started conducting research in coral reef areas around the world to observe the effects of the chemicals in sunscreen.
“We showed, for the first time,” she said, that some filters and preservatives “caused complete coral bleaching even at very low concentrations. Since then, we have continued to test several [sunscreens], including some ‘eco-friendly’ products, on different marine organisms, and have found that some sun products cause abnormalities in embryos and larvae.”
This included “irreversible damage” to the development of the sea urchin. More work, such as the research published by Downs in 2015, found that oxybenzone was fatal to coral larvae.
While people might think the bit of sunscreen they use at the beach — and dermatologists say people routinely under-use sunscreen — cannot have much of an effect compared with the vastness of the ocean, Downs’ study found that oxybenzone had a detrimental impact at 62 parts per trillion — the equivalent of one drop in six-and-a-half Olympic-sized swimming pools.
“Any coastal area, especially in summer when beaches are crowded, is at risk, particularly in shallow waters where sunscreen concentrations can reach relatively high levels,” Corinaldesi said.
While the effect on coral reefs has attracted the most attention, other marine life might be affected, including “phytoplankton, small crustaceans, molluscs and fish, which support food webs, and other organisms such as sea urchins, which are ecosystem engineers and essential for the creation of marine habitats.”
It is not just UV filters that are of concern.
Marine Conservation Society chemicals policy and advocacy manager Francesca Bevan said perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl (PFAS) chemicals, known as “forever chemicals” because they take so long to degrade, are still found in some cosmetics and products, including sunscreen, despite an incoming EU ban on non-essential use.
These chemicals do not just wash into the sea — they can also trickle into waterways when people shower them away at home.
PFAS chemicals “are so mobile in the environment that they’ve been found in the Arctic, and places that are ridiculously far from any human activity. It shows they can move around the world,” Bevan said.
The Marine Conservation Society has started looking into the effects of sunscreen, Bevan said.
“With climate change, sunscreen use is only going to go up, and people are a lot more aware of sun damage and skin cancer,” she said.
Rather than smearing it top to toe, she said that people could seek shade and cover up with clothes, with sunscreen used only on the smaller exposed areas of skin.
“Limiting the use of any harmful chemicals would be a good thing,” she added.
Many sunscreens are marketed as “reef safe.” Mineral sunscreens, which often use zinc oxide as a physical UV shield, have been promoted as an alternative, which Corinaldesi herself has argued for.
However, she said new evidence is emerging that suggests they, too, might cause some harm.
“Further studies we carried out indicate that mineral filters such as zinc oxide nanoparticles cause rapid coral bleaching and also damage the algae that live with them, as well as damage the developmental stages of many marine species,” she said.
Corinaldesi now advises people to avoid products containing several ingredients, including oxybenzone, octinoxate and octocrylene.
She also said to avoid nano-sized zinc oxide in mineral sunscreen, and recommended looking for independently tested brands.
It is not easy for consumers to decipher all of this, and there are also other barriers, besides their higher cost: Many mineral sunscreens leave a white cast, which can be especially noticeable on darker skin. It is the use of nanoparticles that reduces the whiteness.
It might all be in vain anyway — or at least a distraction from the real problems.
“The three main threats to coral reefs are global warming, overfishing and coastal water pollution,” said Terry Hughes, professor at Queensland’s James Cook University’s College of Science and Engineering, former director of the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies and one of the world’s leading coral reef experts.
“Coral bleaching is triggered by rising temperatures due primarily to burning fossil fuels. We have already seen three global-scale coral bleaching events due to record-breaking heatwaves, in 1998, 2010 and 2015-2016, which affected 50 to 70 percent of tropical reefs,” Hughes said.
“Even the most remote reefs, far from mass tourism or sunscreen, are affected by global warming. There is no scientific evidence that use of sunscreens by people has a harmful effect on coral reefs,” he said.
The studies showing a link between sunscreen and harm to coral have largely been done in “unrealistic lab experiments,” Hughes said.
Switching to a “reef-safe” sunscreen might make people feel they are doing enough, when “realistically, tourists could support reefs a lot more by flying less, and especially by voting for politicians who would take urgent action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Fighting climate change is the key to reducing the global threat of coral bleaching,” he said.
Corinaldesi said that “the impact of global climate change on coral reefs is the main problem, [as well as] pollution, overfishing and the spreading of viral and bacterial diseases.”
Yet she believes the chemicals used in products such as sunscreen might worsen their effects.
After her diving trip to Palau, Blum worked on several new products, including sunscreen, that have less of an effect on the environment.
“I’m not going to say that sunscreen is the number one contributor to coral decline, but it’s a very easy one that we can eliminate,” she said.
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has offered Taiwan a paradoxical mix of reassurance and risk. Trump’s visceral hostility toward China could reinforce deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Yet his disdain for alliances and penchant for transactional bargaining threaten to erode what Taiwan needs most: a reliable US commitment. Taiwan’s security depends less on US power than on US reliability, but Trump is undermining the latter. Deterrence without credibility is a hollow shield. Trump’s China policy in his second term has oscillated wildly between confrontation and conciliation. One day, he threatens Beijing with “massive” tariffs and calls China America’s “greatest geopolitical
On Sunday, 13 new urgent care centers (UCC) officially began operations across the six special municipalities. The purpose of the centers — which are open from 8am to midnight on Sundays and national holidays — is to reduce congestion in hospital emergency rooms, especially during the nine-day Lunar New Year holiday next year. It remains to be seen how effective these centers would be. For one, it is difficult for people to judge for themselves whether their condition warrants visiting a major hospital or a UCC — long-term public education and health promotions are necessary. Second, many emergency departments acknowledge
US President Donald Trump’s seemingly throwaway “Taiwan is Taiwan” statement has been appearing in headlines all over the media. Although it appears to have been made in passing, the comment nevertheless reveals something about Trump’s views and his understanding of Taiwan’s situation. In line with the Taiwan Relations Act, the US and Taiwan enjoy unofficial, but close economic, cultural and national defense ties. They lack official diplomatic relations, but maintain a partnership based on shared democratic values and strategic alignment. Excluding China, Taiwan maintains a level of diplomatic relations, official or otherwise, with many nations worldwide. It can be said that
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) made the astonishing assertion during an interview with Germany’s Deutsche Welle, published on Friday last week, that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not a dictator. She also essentially absolved Putin of blame for initiating the war in Ukraine. Commentators have since listed the reasons that Cheng’s assertion was not only absurd, but bordered on dangerous. Her claim is certainly absurd to the extent that there is no need to discuss the substance of it: It would be far more useful to assess what drove her to make the point and stick so
RSS