Financial firms — including British insurer Prudential, lenders Citi and HSBC, and BlackRock Real Assets — are devising plans to speed the closure of Asia’s coal-fired power plants to lower the biggest source of carbon emissions, five people with knowledge of the initiative said.
The novel proposal, which is being driven by the Asian Development Bank (ADB), offers a potentially workable model and early talks with Asian governments and multilateral banks are promising, the sources said.
The group plans to create public-private partnerships to buy out the plants and wind them down within 15 years, far sooner than their usual life, giving workers time to retire or find new jobs, and allowing countries to shift to renewable energy sources.
Illustration: Kevin Sheu
It aims to have a model ready for the UN Climate Change Conference (COP26) in Glasgow, Scotland, in November.
“The private sector has great ideas on how to address climate change and we are bridging the gap between them and the official-sector actors,” ADB vice president Ahmed Saeed said.
The initiative comes as commercial and development banks, under pressure from large investors, pull back from financing new power plants to meet climate targets.
A first purchase under the proposed scheme, which would comprise a mix of equity, debt and concessional finance, could come as soon as next year, Saeed said.
“If you can come up with an orderly way to replace those plants sooner and retire them sooner, but not overnight, that opens up a more predictable, massively bigger space for renewables,” said Donald Kanak, chairman of Prudential’s insurance growth markets, who came up with the idea.
Coal-fired power accounts for about one-fifth of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions, making it the biggest polluter.
The proposed mechanism entails raising low cost, blended finance which would be used for a carbon reduction facility, while a separate facility would fund renewable incentives.
HSBC declined to comment on the plan.
Finding a way for developing nations in Asia, which has the world’s newest fleet of coal plants and more under construction, to make the most of the billions already spent and switch to renewables has proved a major challenge.
The International Energy Agency expects global coal demand to rise 4.5 percent this year, with Asia making up 80 percent of that growth.
Meanwhile, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change is calling for a drop in coal-fired electricity from 38 percent to 9 percent of global generation by 2030 and to 0.6 percent by 2050.
The proposed carbon reduction facility would buy and operate coal-fired power plants, at a lower cost of capital than is available to commercial plants, allowing them to run at a wider margin, but for less time to generate similar returns.
The cash flow would repay debt and investors.
The other facility would be used to jump start investments in renewables and storage to take over the energy load from the plants as it grows, attracting finance on its own.
The model is already familiar to infrastructure investors who rely on blended finance in so-called public-private deals, backed by government-financed institutions.
In this case, development banks would take the biggest risk by agreeing to take first loss as holders of junior debt as well as accepting a lower return, according to the proposal.
“To make this viable on more than one or two plants, you’ve got to get private investors,” said Michael Paulus, head of Citi’s Asia-Pacific public sector group, who is involved in the initiative.
“There are some who are interested, but they are not going to do it for free. They may not need a normal return of 10 to 12 percent, they may do it for less, but they are not going to accept 1 or 2 percent. We are trying to figure out some way to make this work,” he added.
Citi declined further comment.
The framework has already been presented to ASEAN finance ministers, the European Commission and European development officials, said Kanak, who cochairs the ASEAN Hub of the Sustainable Development Investment Partnership.
Details still to be finalized include ways to encourage coal plant owners to sell, what to do with the plants once they are retired, any rehabilitation requirements, and what role if any carbon credits might play.
The firms aim to attract finance and other commitments at COP26, when governments would be asked to commit to more ambitious emissions targets and increase financing for countries most vulnerable to climate change.
US President Joe Biden’s administration has re-entered the Paris Agreement and is pushing for ambitious reductions of carbon emissions, while in July, US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen told the heads of major development banks, including ADB and the World Bank, to devise plans to mobilize more capital to fight climate change and support emission cuts.
A US Treasury official said that the ADB’s plans for coal plant retirement are among the types of projects that Yellen wants banks to pursue, adding that the administration is “interested in accelerating coal transitions” to tackle the climate crisis.
As part of the group’s proposal, the ADB has allocated about US$1.7 million for feasibility studies covering Indonesia, Philippines and Vietnam, to estimate the costs of early closure, which assets could be acquired, and engage with governments and other stakeholders.
“We would like to do the first [coal plant] acquisition in 2022,” Saeed said, adding that the mechanism could be scaled up and used as a template for other regions, if successful.
It is already in discussions about extending this work to other countries in Asia, he said.
To retire 50 percent of a country’s capacity early at US$1 million to US$1.8 million per megawatt suggests that Indonesia would require a total facility of US$16 billion to US$29 billion, while the Philippines would be about US$5 billion to US$9 billion and Vietnam US$9 billion to US$17 billion, according to Kanak’s estimates.
One challenge that needs to be tackled is the potential risk of moral hazard, London School of Economics sustainable finance professor Nick Robins said.
“There’s a longstanding principle that the polluter should pay. We need to make absolutely sure that we are not paying the polluter, but rather paying for accelerated transition,” he said.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS