A couple of years ago, during a meeting of Tibetan leaders in Dharamshala, India, Tenzin Gyatso, the 14th Dalai Lama, was asked about his reincarnation. Addressing the room of monks, religious teachers and Tibetan politicians, the Dalai Lama asked them to look into his eyes.
“Do you think it’s time now?” he asked.
It was a meeting that would end with the Tibetan leaders agreeing that the issue of reincarnation was one that would be decided only by the Dalai Lama himself.
Illustration: Mountain People
China, which annexed Tibet in 1951 and has retained tight control over the region ever since, has other ideas though. It insists that the choice of the next Dalai Lama lies only with China and has even enshrined this right into law.
The Dalai Lama, who turned 86 last month, has insisted that discussions of his death are premature. According to his own visions, he would live to 113.
However, a power struggle for who will choose his reincarnation after he dies has already begun.
“We are looking at the highly likely situation that when the 14th Dalai Lama dies, there will be two Dalai Lamas named in his place: one selected on the basis of instructions left behind by His Holiness the Dalai Lama and one chosen by the Chinese Communist Party [CCP],” said Robert Barnett, a researcher at the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.
China is not the only country keeping a watchful eye on the Dalai Lama’s succession. Since 1959, the Dalai Lama has lived in exile in Dharamshala, nestled in the Himalayas, and Tibet has remained a sensitive factor in India’s relationship with China, with which it shares a border of nearly 3,500km.
India has control over the Dalai Lama’s movements, within India and abroad.
As relations with China have over the past year deteriorated to historic lows due to a deadly border clash, there has been increased pressure on the Indian government to strengthen its Tibet policy to counter China, including declaring that only the Dalai Lama can choose his successor.
Last month, in what was described as a “significant departure” from previous policy, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi wished the Dalai Lama a happy birthday on Twitter.
According to the president of the Tibetan parliament-in-exile, a meeting is planned between the two this year.
The controversies over the Dalai Lama’s successor are likely to have a direct effect on India. One possible scenario put forward by the Dalai Lama himself is that he could be reincarnated in a “free country,” likely to be India rather than Tibet.
Last week, it emerged that several members of the Dalai Lama’s inner circle, as well as senior figures in the Tibetan Central Administration, which operates out of Dharamshala, were among those selected as potential targets for surveillance with the Pegasus spyware made by Israeli company NSO.
Analysts say that it might have been the Indian government selecting the potential surveillance targets. New Delhi denies any surveillance.
India is not alone in seeing the Dalai Lama’s succession as a matter of geopolitical importance.
Last year, in a direct shot at China, the US revised its Tibet policy to declare that only Tibetans had the right to select the next Dalai Lama.
According to teachings, each Dalai Lama is a reincarnation of the Avalokitevara, who embodies the compassion of all Buddhas. He is the foremost spiritual leader of the Gelug school of Tibetan Buddhism and in many times past and present also a political leader of Tibetans.
Traditionally, after he dies, a search begins in Tibet to find his reincarnation, based on signs such as where he was looking when died, which direction the smoke blows when he is cremated and visions interpreted from Lhamo La-tso, an oracle lake in Tibet.
Search parties are then sent out to find children born around the date of his death who match these visions. They are then put through a series of tests, until the right one is divined.
While most Dalai Lamas have been found in Tibet, one was born in Mongolia and another in an area that is now India.
However, with Tibet under the control of China, this process, which led to the discovery of two-year-old Lhamo Dhondup — now known as Tenzin Gyatso — in a small farming village in north-eastern Tibet in February 1940, is unlikely to be repeated. It is now enshrined in Chinese law that Beijing must approve all reincarnations of senior Lamas, including Tibetan Buddhism’s highest teacher, the Dalai Lama.
Beijing strongly reiterated this position in a Tibet white paper in May, on the 70th anniversary of its annexation of Tibet.
This has been rejected by the Dalai Lama and the Tibetan parliament-in-exile.
The parliament’s president, Penpa Tsering, who works closely with the Dalai Lama, said: “A nonbeliever, atheist government like China interfering in Tibetan spiritual matters is a complete no-no, it cannot be accepted. The world has turned against China. We firmly believe no one will trust their choice.”
The Dalai Lama has also expressed concern that his reincarnation might be hijacked and politicized in “brazen meddling” by Beijing, and has publicly contemplated being reincarnated as a woman or not at all.
The Dalai Lama has put forward three options for his reincarnation, all a departure from the past. The first is that he would be reincarnated in the traditional form, reborn as a child, but outside Tibet. The other options invoked even more niche Buddhist ideas of “emanation” and opened up the possibility of the Dalai Lama appointing a living successor before he dies.
He has rejected the legitimacy of Beijing’s proposed method of finding his reincarnation, which involves a name being pulled from a “golden urn.”
While the Dalai Lama was once spiritual leader only to Tibetans, he now has a huge following and has become something of a global celebrity.
Attempts by China to interfere in his reincarnation would be likely to spark a global backlash.
For the Tibetan leadership, the issue is not seen as pressing; aside from a brief cancer scare, the Dalai Lama is reported to be in good health and has himself said that he would begin making a decision about his reincarnation options after he turns 90.
“His Holiness the Dalai Lama has said many times in jest that if the Chinese are really concerned about the issue of reincarnation, they should look for Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) reincarnation first, Deng Xiaoping’s (鄧小平) second, and then maybe the Dalai Lama,” Tsering said.
While officially there has been no communication between Beijing and the Tibetan government-in-exile since 2010, Tsering confirmed that back channels between the two sides remained active, and that the Tibetan leadership and the Dalai Lama were now pushing for the Dalai Lama to finally be allowed to visit Tibet and China for the first time since he escaped.
However, Tsering emphasised that the issue of the next Dalai Lama was not up for negotiation with the Chinese government.
“Reincarnation is a decision that has to be made by the person who’s going to be reincarnated. So we would advise the Chinese leadership to learn Buddhism first,” he said.
However, the Chinese government is already preparing the groundwork for selection of the next Dalai Lama.
The CCP in January secretly assembled 25 senior government figures into a committee to begin preparing for the selection process, Barnett said.
“We also know from personal accounts that the Chinese have spent the last 10 years winning over individual Lamas inside Tibet, offering them free trips to China and telling them that if they support Beijing they won’t be persecuted, so that when the time comes these Lamas will support the Chinese choice for the Dalai Lama,” Barnett said. “It’s proving very effective.”
The preparations appear to be an attempt to avoid repeating the chaotic events of 1995, when, without consulting the Chinese government, the Dalai Lama declared that a six-year-old boy, Gedhun Choekyi Nyima, was the next reincarnated Panchen Lama, the second-most important figure in Tibetan Buddhism.
Three days later, Nyima disappeared and has not been seen since.
The Panchen Lama that the Chinese government then appointed in his place remains rejected by most Tibetans.
Beijing’s apparent determination to select and control the next Dalai Lama is also seen as a response to the enduring popularity of the current spiritual leader, which has undermined its control of Tibet.
Despite extensive efforts to “re-educate” Tibetans and other propaganda programs, as well as banning the image of the Dalai Lama inside Tibet, he is still secretly revered by many Tibetans.
The Chinese government has repeatedly accused the Dalai Lama of “separatist” activities, and held him responsible for self-immolations that Tibetans still carry out in protest and uprisings such as those in 2008.
“The fact that the Chinese government wants a reincarnation of their choice shows that they consider the institution important enough that it needs to be owned and manipulated in order to finally settle to Tibet issue,” said Amitabh Mathur, a former adviser to the Indian government on Tibetan affairs. “This is largely due to the exceptional personality of the 14th Dalai Lama and the hold he still has over Tibetans. Hence the desperation to have their own Dalai Lama.”
After more than a year of review, the National Security Bureau on Monday said it has completed a sweeping declassification of political archives from the Martial Law period, transferring the full collection to the National Archives Administration under the National Development Council. The move marks another significant step in Taiwan’s long journey toward transitional justice. The newly opened files span the architecture of authoritarian control: internal security and loyalty investigations, intelligence and counterintelligence operations, exit and entry controls, overseas surveillance of Taiwan independence activists, and case materials related to sedition and rebellion charges. For academics of Taiwan’s White Terror era —
On Feb. 7, the New York Times ran a column by Nicholas Kristof (“What if the valedictorians were America’s cool kids?”) that blindly and lavishly praised education in Taiwan and in Asia more broadly. We are used to this kind of Orientalist admiration for what is, at the end of the day, paradoxically very Anglo-centered. They could have praised Europeans for valuing education, too, but one rarely sees an American praising Europe, right? It immediately made me think of something I have observed. If Taiwanese education looks so wonderful through the eyes of the archetypal expat, gazing from an ivory tower, how
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
China has apparently emerged as one of the clearest and most predictable beneficiaries of US President Donald Trump’s “America First” and “Make America Great Again” approach. Many countries are scrambling to defend their interests and reputation regarding an increasingly unpredictable and self-seeking US. There is a growing consensus among foreign policy pundits that the world has already entered the beginning of the end of Pax Americana, the US-led international order. Consequently, a number of countries are reversing their foreign policy preferences. The result has been an accelerating turn toward China as an alternative economic partner, with Beijing hosting Western leaders, albeit
RSS