On July 5, the Liberty Times (sister paper of the Taipei Times) reported mass deaths of oysters at a farm in the Erkan (二崁) area of Penghu County’s Siyu Township (西嶼). The death rate of cultured oysters was as high as 60 percent, the report said.
From my years of research on oyster culture, the cause of the mass deaths is not climate change, water temperature or disease — as some academics and experts have suggested — but the importation of triploid oysters, also known as “3N oysters,” from China at the beginning of this year.
The death rate of cultured oysters in other areas of the county is as low as 10 percent. If the high death rate had been caused by weather conditions, water temperature or disease, it would have been a common phenomenon throughout the county and there would not have been a huge gap between the death rates in neighboring areas.
The oyster farm imported the 3N oysters from China early this year. As the water was cold at that time, the fast-growing Chinese oysters initially thrived.
However, the Chinese oysters did not survive Taiwan’s hot summer, an outcome I warned the oyster farmer of at the time.
Why can 3N oysters from China not survive the high temperatures in Taiwan?
The Chinese oysters are from the Pacific Ocean, while Taiwanese oysters are from Portugal. As a result, their resistance to heat varies greatly.
Pacific oysters live at higher latitudes, and are more suited to temperate zones. They are tolerant of low winter temperatures, but cannot tolerate high temperatures in subtropical zones.
Many business operators import oysters to Taiwan every year, and such products can be divided into two types: frozen, top-off oysters and live oysters shipped by air.
The latter are immediately delivered to restaurants and stay in fish tanks until they are sold.
However, most are from the Pacific and can only survive in fish tanks whose temperature do not exceed 16°C.
The 3N oysters should not be blamed for this, as the Pacific oysters simply cannot adapt to the conditions in Taiwan.
Some academics say that the deaths were caused by the extreme weather, warm water or even attacks from hairy triton sea snails.
If these were really the causes, oysters elsewhere in Penghu, or even Taiwan proper, should have died too.
However, this was clearly not the case.
Taiwan’s oyster farmers should not import Chinese oysters without regard for these differences.
China is still a cholera-affected area and the origin of infectious diseases. Importing Chinese aquatic products has the potential to do great harm to Taiwan’s aquaculture industry.
Moreover, the mass deaths of the Chinese oysters would have bred germs, which also pose a risk to local species.
Jiang Yuh-shiun is the chairman of Taiwan Oyster Progressive Biotechnology Corp.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past