No one knows which strategies will prove most effective in the fight against COVID-19, but a meeting of Minister of Health and Welfare Chen Shih-chung (陳時中) and Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) clearly showed the volatility of political idolatry.
Their meeting at a news conference at Taipei’s Huannan Market on Friday provided much food for thought, because Ko has apparently been competing with Chen over whose disease control strategy is more effective. Additionally, Chen is considered a potential Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) candidate for next year’s Taipei mayoral election.
A poll conducted by the Taiwanese Public Opinion Foundation from June 15 to 19 found that Ko’s Taiwan People’s Party garnered a 7.1 percentage point increase in support from the previous month, while the DPP’s and the main opposition Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) numbers dropped slightly.
However, the poll was conducted before the public became aware of the severity of the outbreaks at three wholesale markets. As of yesterday, the number of infections connected to these markets had surpassed 200, while the Huannan Market cluster had passed 100 cases.
The prolonged outbreak in the capital is likely to dash many people’s hopes that the pandemic alert level will be lowered after July 12.
On June 24, Ko said that the cluster at the firm’s markets was “not as bad as you think” and persisted in his strategy of using rapid virus tests before administering vaccines and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests for thousands of market workers, although Chen a day earlier advised the city government to primarily use PCR testing to identify all infections at the markets.
When the city government began conducting large-scale PCR testing on Thursday last week, at least 41 cases were identified from the Huannan Market, showing that Chen’s judgement was accurate.
However, Chen, who heads the Central Epidemic Command Center, is not always correct. Over the past few months, he has drawn no less criticism for the center’s vaccination rollout and easing quarantine rules for airline crew in April, the latter considered the most likely cause of the local outbreak.
When Chen was at the peak of his popularity, he helped promote agricultural products at daily news briefings, and he was even invited by pop star Chan Ya-wen (詹雅雯) to sing at her concert at the Taipei Arena in September last year.
Political idolatry is commonplace in Taiwan, but a cruel fact is that voters can adore their idols at one moment, but spurn them at the next, if they find that their heroes are ordinary people who make mistakes and get lost in their hubris.
During the Friday news conference, even independent Legislator Freddy Lim (林昶佐), elected from Wanhua District, where the Huannan Market is located, was accused by some market vendors of paying inadequate attention to their concerns since the outbreak started, after Lim criticized Ko for his delayed virus responses.
The outbreak has accelerated the turnover rates of political stars.
Some social media users have joked that the news conference at the Huannan Market was one of the best since the outbreak started, given that it dramatically demonstrated the intriguing relationships between the central and local governments.
Other online commentators said they agreed with the vendors who chided the legislator, because they spoke the truth: The public want their normal lives back rather than more political shows.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations