Taiwan played a great game when the COVID-19 pandemic began spreading around the world early last year, but it dropped the ball in the ninth inning.
During the six weeks since a nationwide level 3 COVID-19 alert was implemented in the middle of May, the most worrisome sources of cluster infections have been hospitals, dormitories of migrants workers at technology factories and stallholders at traditional markets.
Markets are a weak point because people tend to visit them weekly, bringing them into contact with crowds of people. It is also difficult to sterilize food sold in markets, as is routinely done with the equipment in hospitals and clinics.
Moreover, markets mostly rely on cash transactions, increasing the risks of infection.
To trace the movements of those who later test positive for COVID-19, city and county governments have implemented a contact registration system in most public places, including supermarkets and traditional markets. To reduce physical contact and improve tracking efficiency, they have replaced paper registers with QR code scanning that sends a user’s information via a text message.
The National Communications Commission budgeted NT$300 million (approx. US$10.7 million) for the system, with telecoms providing the text message service for free.
However, even during the current serious outbreak, there is puzzlingly no significant trend to move from cash to electronic transactions. Even in Taipei and New Taipei City, other than convenience stores and supermarkets, most vendors and small shops only take cash and do not accept any form of electronic payment.
Last year, I submitted several letters and articles to the media, in which I said that cash is hard to sterilize, so we should seize this opportunity to popularize mobile payment. Most people have by now realized that cash is like a petri dish for transmitting bacteria and viruses. There have been media reports about vendors and other people spraying cash with alcohol, heating it in an oven or disinfecting it with ultraviolet light, but few people have tried these methods, and even if they work, they are not cost-effective.
As for why small traders do not use electronic payment, the main reasons are likely that elderly people would find it difficult, and that payment processing fees would be incurred.
In many of the cases in which market vendors have caught COVID-19 from an unknown source, shoppers and vendors alike wonder why they were infected despite wearing masks. The loophole in these cases may well be the use of cash.
Technology acceptance models indicate that to make the public more willing to use a new technology, besides making users aware of its usefulness and convenience, environmental factors must also be taken into account. If elderly people can learn how to use text messages under the government’s disease prevention directives, surely they can also learn how to use electronic payment.
If the government can provide strong support and public information at this crucial time, and coordinate with electronic payment service providers to reduce or suspend their processing fees, it would probably make stallholders and other small businesses more willing to use the technology.
Judging by the way in which mobile payment utilities have developed in the past, if electronic payment providers or the government were to provide incentives and subsidies, it would create an even greater incentive and, hopefully, close this loophole in disease prevention.
Lei Lih-wei is an associate professor at Chihlee University of Technology.
Translated by Julian Clegg
The world has become less predictable, less rules-based, and more shaped by the impulses of strongmen and short-term dealmaking. Nowhere is this more consequential than in East Asia, where the fate of democratic Taiwan hinges on how global powers manage — or mismanage — tensions with an increasingly assertive China. The return of Donald Trump to the White House has deepened the global uncertainty, with his erratic, highly personalized foreign-policy approach unsettling allies and adversaries alike. Trump appears to treat foreign policy like a reality show. Yet, paradoxically, the global unpredictability may offer Taiwan unexpected deterrence. For China, the risk of provoking the
Eating at a breakfast shop the other day, I turned to an old man sitting at the table next to mine. “Hey, did you hear that the Legislative Yuan passed a bill to give everyone NT$10,000 [US$340]?” I said, pointing to a newspaper headline. The old man cursed, then said: “Yeah, the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] canceled the NT$100 billion subsidy for Taiwan Power Co and announced they would give everyone NT$10,000 instead. “Nice. Now they are saying that if electricity prices go up, we can just use that cash to pay for it,” he said. “I have no time for drivel like
Young supporters of former Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) were detained for posting the names and photographs of judges and prosecutors believed to be overseeing the Core Pacific City redevelopment corruption case. The supporters should be held responsible for their actions. As for Ko’s successor, TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌), he should reflect on whether his own comments are provocative and whether his statements might be misunderstood. Huang needs to apologize to the public and the judiciary. In the article, “Why does sorry seem to be the hardest word?” the late political commentator Nan Fang Shuo (南方朔) wrote
Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) reportedly told the EU’s top diplomat that China does not want Russia to lose in Ukraine, because the US could shift its focus to countering Beijing. Wang made the comment while meeting with EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Kaja Kallas on July 2 at the 13th China-EU High-Level Strategic Dialogue in Brussels, the South China Morning Post and CNN reported. Although contrary to China’s claim of neutrality in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, such a frank remark suggests Beijing might prefer a protracted war to keep the US from focusing on
RSS