China has ramped up its disinformation campaign against Taiwan, using a COVID-19 outbreak to provoke discontent against the government, an international newspaper said on Tuesday.
The Financial Times report said Chinese media claimed that “tens of thousands of Taiwanese people were flocking to China to get vaccinated,” and that “Taipei was planning to give jabs to its diplomatic allies although it did not have enough to vaccinate its own population” — claims denied by the government.
Such rumors are often then spread in Taiwan through social media such as the Line messaging app or the PTT online bulletin board, and are often picked up by Taiwanese media, the newspaper said, adding that the problem is perpetuated by a lack of “journalistic rigor” in the country.
The government certainly faces a dilemma in holding mainstream media accountable for what is reported, while also ensuring press freedom. One way the problem can be addressed — which the Financial Times says groups in Taiwan are working on — is to educate high-school students on how to critically assess the validity of information they encounter.
After President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) offered condolences on Twitter last week to people affected by a building collapse in Florida, a reply came from what was obviously a fake account. The user appeared to be a white man named “Rick Consens” and wrote: “Tsai’s heart goes around everywhere except for people living in Taiwan.” If the odd grammar were not indication enough, looking at the user’s bio, followers and other tweets made it obvious that this was a fake account, likely made by someone in China.
Even so, the reply was shared on anti-Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Facebook pages. One user named Yu Chun-sheng (余俊昇) — whose “cover photo” was an altered DPP logo showing someone begging and the words “vaccine beggar” — shared the reply on an ETtoday news post and wrote: “Vegetable bucket [Tsai] is grieving for foreigners, but even foreigners have had enough of it.”
It is largely irrelevant what foreigners think of Taiwan’s president, but the intention of the tweet from the fake account is the same as that of all misinformation produced by China — to provoke discontent and raise doubts about the government, and cause a rift in Taiwanese society.
The aims of these tactics are to influence policy and the outcomes of elections, and to foster politicians and legislation that are friendly toward or pliable by Beijing. This is a slow process, but as anti-vaccine campaigns and elections elsewhere in the world have demonstrated, people can be manipulated through such processes.
People consume information in “bite-sized” amounts through mobile devices, which makes tweets and Internet memes effective in manipulating voters over time. China’s favorite meme topic at present seems to be depicting Tsai as a despot.
If there is any comfort to be had from China’s misinformation campaign, it is that it demonstrates Beijing’s likely lack of confidence in its ability to succeed in a military invasion of Taiwan. Naturally, China’s Internet troll army and its propaganda rag Global Times would vehemently deny this, but why would China spend time and resources on information warfare if it could achieve its aims militarily?
China also regularly denies — through official press statements and through the numerous fake accounts of its troll army — that claims of false news reports produced by China are themselves “fake news,” but that is to be expected.
The government should ensure that students take mandatory media literacy courses to help them make informed decisions about what they see and read. It could also require news agencies and social media platforms to flag information determined by an independent body to be questionable.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS