China has ramped up its disinformation campaign against Taiwan, using a COVID-19 outbreak to provoke discontent against the government, an international newspaper said on Tuesday.
The Financial Times report said Chinese media claimed that “tens of thousands of Taiwanese people were flocking to China to get vaccinated,” and that “Taipei was planning to give jabs to its diplomatic allies although it did not have enough to vaccinate its own population” — claims denied by the government.
Such rumors are often then spread in Taiwan through social media such as the Line messaging app or the PTT online bulletin board, and are often picked up by Taiwanese media, the newspaper said, adding that the problem is perpetuated by a lack of “journalistic rigor” in the country.
The government certainly faces a dilemma in holding mainstream media accountable for what is reported, while also ensuring press freedom. One way the problem can be addressed — which the Financial Times says groups in Taiwan are working on — is to educate high-school students on how to critically assess the validity of information they encounter.
After President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) offered condolences on Twitter last week to people affected by a building collapse in Florida, a reply came from what was obviously a fake account. The user appeared to be a white man named “Rick Consens” and wrote: “Tsai’s heart goes around everywhere except for people living in Taiwan.” If the odd grammar were not indication enough, looking at the user’s bio, followers and other tweets made it obvious that this was a fake account, likely made by someone in China.
Even so, the reply was shared on anti-Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Facebook pages. One user named Yu Chun-sheng (余俊昇) — whose “cover photo” was an altered DPP logo showing someone begging and the words “vaccine beggar” — shared the reply on an ETtoday news post and wrote: “Vegetable bucket [Tsai] is grieving for foreigners, but even foreigners have had enough of it.”
It is largely irrelevant what foreigners think of Taiwan’s president, but the intention of the tweet from the fake account is the same as that of all misinformation produced by China — to provoke discontent and raise doubts about the government, and cause a rift in Taiwanese society.
The aims of these tactics are to influence policy and the outcomes of elections, and to foster politicians and legislation that are friendly toward or pliable by Beijing. This is a slow process, but as anti-vaccine campaigns and elections elsewhere in the world have demonstrated, people can be manipulated through such processes.
People consume information in “bite-sized” amounts through mobile devices, which makes tweets and Internet memes effective in manipulating voters over time. China’s favorite meme topic at present seems to be depicting Tsai as a despot.
If there is any comfort to be had from China’s misinformation campaign, it is that it demonstrates Beijing’s likely lack of confidence in its ability to succeed in a military invasion of Taiwan. Naturally, China’s Internet troll army and its propaganda rag Global Times would vehemently deny this, but why would China spend time and resources on information warfare if it could achieve its aims militarily?
China also regularly denies — through official press statements and through the numerous fake accounts of its troll army — that claims of false news reports produced by China are themselves “fake news,” but that is to be expected.
The government should ensure that students take mandatory media literacy courses to help them make informed decisions about what they see and read. It could also require news agencies and social media platforms to flag information determined by an independent body to be questionable.
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at
RSS