In an orgy of backslapping and self-congratulatory hyperbole, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) yesterday threw a massive party for itself to celebrate the 100th anniversary of its founding in 1921.
Choreographed celebrations took place across China over the past two days, but the main events were in Beijing, where yesterday Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) addressed an adoring crowd in Tiananmen Square. The festivities featured all the gaudy glitz, iconography and regimented blandness that is to be expected at CCP jamborees. It was the 2008 Beijing Olympics all over again, minus the athletes: a giant stage for the CCP to project a sanitized image of itself to its people and the rest of the world.
Needless to say, the usual suspects from Taiwan’s pro-China lobby latched on to the celebrations like needy children, and joined in on the CCP’s airbrushing of history.
Reporting by international media in the run-up to the centenary has largely taken the form of a scorecard, weighing up the party’s “hits and misses.” A general gist was that Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) flawed policies resulted in millions of deaths, but the party dusted itself off after the Cultural Revolution and unleashed an economic miracle that lifted tens of millions out of poverty, more than at any time in human history.
This form of analysis is hopelessly flawed and regurgitates the CCP’s propaganda.
Leaving aside the party’s brutal terrorist tactics employed prior to 1949, once it was in charge of China, Mao’s policies, from the Anti-Rightist Movement to the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution, are estimated to have starved or killed up to 60 million people — more than those who suffered under Soviet leader Joseph Stalin.
The party’s export of Maoist communism to other Asian nations gave birth to the Khmer Rouge and the killing fields of Cambodia. Historians estimate that at least 90 percent of foreign aid to Pol Pot’s regime came from the CCP.
In China, the situation deteriorated to such an extent during the Cultural Revolution that during the Guangxi Massacre, thousands reportedly participated in cannibalism — and not because of famine.
Under three decades of Mao’s inept and sadistic rule, the CCP set China’s development back by at least as many decades. By 1979, the party relented and began to grant its downtrodden citizens the freedom to trade on the open market. Had it not been for the CCP, China could have been as prosperous as Taiwan, Singapore or South Korea were at that point. China’s subsequent multi-decade period of explosive economic growth has been a game of manic catch-up, in spite of, not thanks to, the rule of the CCP.
Former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平) is usually described as a benign liberal reformer, yet he initiated no democratic reforms, started a war with Vietnam and ordered the People’s Liberation Army to fire on its own people during the 1989 Tiananmen Square Massacre. Contrary to popular belief, most of the killing occurred away from the square, in the streets and alleyways of Beijing, with the army firing indiscriminately at residents in their homes.
Deng’s appointed successor, former Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民), launched the brutal suppression of millions of Falun Gong practitioners and presided over the introduction of forced organ harvesting of prisoners.
Then there is the ongoing repression in Tibet, Xinjiang and Inner Mongolia; the list goes on.
Praising the CCP for its “achievements” is as crass as attempting to provide a “balanced” analysis of the Nazi Party: "Yes they did destroy Germany’s democracy, and they were horrible to the Jews, but they built some fine roads."
Let us hear no more of the CCP’s “achievements”; it is an inglorious centenary of shame.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS