When will the world have vaccinated 80 percent of all adults, the level presumed by scientists to produce herd immunity against COVID-19? Most people’s answer is 2023 or 2024, which suggests deep pessimism about the progress of vaccinations outside the rich world. That is also why pledges at the recent G7 summit to donate 1 billion doses to poor countries this year and next year looks to some like generous game changers.
Despair is the wrong sentiment and self-congratulation by the G7 is the wrong reaction. If the daily rate of vaccinations can be maintained, the world can reach its vaccination goal by January.
The first step toward effective action is to convince oneself that a problem is solvable. To that end, the Global Commission for Post-Pandemic Policy, an independent, nonpartisan group of 34 high-level doers and thinkers from around the globe, has done the math to come up with a global vaccine countdown.
Surprisingly, we found that the challenge is much more manageable than previously imagined, and on a timetable much faster than that assumed by the G7 governments.
The arithmetic is simple, but first you have to decide whether to regard China, the world’s most populous country, as an inspiration or an exception. According to Our World in Data, China accounts for 17 million to 20 million of the 33 million to 36 million doses being administered worldwide every day.
With China included, the countdown reaches zero in just more than 200 days; without China, the time increases to 370 days. That is an important difference, but it amounts to reaching the finish line in July next year, rather than in January.
Even if a higher threshold of 90 percent becomes necessary, owing to the lower efficacy of Chinese vaccines, the goal is still nearly there.
Look at the numbers: The world’s population is 7.9 billion, an estimated 5.85 billion of whom are adults (74 percent). If the goal is an immunization rate of 80 percent, 4.7 billion would need shots, which on a two-dose vaccine regimen means 9.4 billion doses.
As of Friday last week, Our World in Data reports that more than 2.3 billion doses have already been administered worldwide, leaving just more than 7 billion doses. Divide that by a mid-range daily figure (34 million) and you get about 211 days — January.
Yes, 7 billion is a large number, but look at what is happening: Every day, China is administering 17 million to 20 million doses; India is administering just more than 3 million; and even Africa is administering nearly 900,000 — a 37 percent increase since the start of the month.
Moreover, these numbers are still rising in most countries. Although not every middle-income country would be able to match China’s pace, that at least should be the motivating goal.
Until recently, the main constraint and source of frustration was the limited supply of vaccines, but production is rising sharply, with the global monthly output of vaccines approved by at least one major regulatory body increasing from 420 million doses in April to 822 million doses last month.
China’s two vaccine makers, Sinovac and Sinopharm, accounted for more than half of this total (nearly tripling output from 164 million doses in April to 454 million last month). Output of Pfizer-BioNTech and Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine doses in the EU doubled, from 69 million to 140 million, while the number of Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson doses in the US rose from 71 million to 105 million.
The only disappointing production figures were in India, where output slipped from 76 million doses in April to 62.6 million last month.
In the coming months, the key constraint would no longer be supply shortages, but rather financing and logistical challenges, particularly in poorer countries with limited infrastructure and healthcare coverage. These hurdles could be lowered if rich countries release their production more quickly for others to buy, and if more bilateral and multilateral aid funding is made available to support public health systems and vaccine purchases.
Make no mistake: China would likely play a large and perhaps leading role in this process. As the world’s biggest producer of COVID-19 vaccines (albeit of a less sophisticated variety than the Western ones), China would have immunized its own population by September or thereabouts, giving it abundant spare production capacity to supply the world (along with funding).
That is why the Western pledges at the G7, welcome as they are, are in reality somewhat behind the curve. The G7 countries are offering their billion doses on a timetable convenient to them, divided between late this year and next year, but actual demand from poor and middle-income countries is coming much sooner than that. This means that China is being given a huge market and diplomatic opportunity of stepping into the breach with perhaps 500 million doses every month during the last four months of this year.
If that happens, the surprisingly short timescale indicated by our vaccine countdown can actually be shortened further. Rural parts of Africa and unstable parts of Latin America would face the biggest challenges, but these could be overcome with aid from rich-country governments, including China’s, and from big philanthropic foundations.
Mass vaccination campaigns in the developing world are nothing new. Success depends on generosity, political will and a belief that the solution is both necessary and achievable.
With new variants emerging rapidly and new outbreaks in places that had seemed to have the virus under control, COVID-19 remains a global problem. We should know by now that it demands a global solution. The recent increase in supplies and the Global Commission’s vaccine countdown indicate that what we need is well within reach.
Bill Emmott, a former editor-in-chief of The Economist, is codirector of the Global Commission for Post-Pandemic Policy.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Speaking at the Copenhagen Democracy Summit on May 13, former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that democracies must remain united and that “Taiwan’s security is essential to regional stability and to defending democratic values amid mounting authoritarianism.” Earlier that day, Tsai had met with a group of Danish parliamentarians led by Danish Parliament Speaker Pia Kjaersgaard, who has visited Taiwan many times, most recently in November last year, when she met with President William Lai (賴清德) at the Presidential Office. Kjaersgaard had told Lai: “I can assure you that ... you can count on us. You can count on our support
Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies. Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports. Denmark has given China a
Many local news media over the past week have reported on Internet personality Holger Chen’s (陳之漢) first visit to China between Tuesday last week and yesterday, as remarks he made during a live stream have sparked wide discussions and strong criticism across the Taiwan Strait. Chen, better known as Kuan Chang (館長), is a former gang member turned fitness celebrity and businessman. He is known for his live streams, which are full of foul-mouthed and hypermasculine commentary. He had previously spoken out against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and criticized Taiwanese who “enjoy the freedom in Taiwan, but want China’s money”
A high-school student surnamed Yang (楊) gained admissions to several prestigious medical schools recently. However, when Yang shared his “learning portfolio” on social media, he was caught exaggerating and even falsifying content, and his admissions were revoked. Now he has to take the “advanced subjects test” scheduled for next month. With his outstanding performance in the general scholastic ability test (GSAT), Yang successfully gained admissions to five prestigious medical schools. However, his university dreams have now been frustrated by the “flaws” in his learning portfolio. This is a wake-up call not only for students, but also teachers. Yang did make a big