The UK would reap an extra ￡4.7 billion (US$6.65 billion) annually by adopting US President Joe Biden’s proposal for a new global minimum corporation tax rate of 21 percent, the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) Centre for Economic Justice has said.
The think tank has urged the British government to embrace and push for Biden’s proposals at the forthcoming G7 summit, arguing that the global system would be fairer and allow the UK to raise billions in vital revenue.
Biden has set out plans, based on long-gestating proposals by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), to force the world’s biggest multinational companies to pay taxes to national governments based on the sales the companies generate in each country, and to establish a global minimum rate to deter firms from shifting profits abroad and to reduce international undercutting on tax.
Illustration: Mountain People
The US initially proposed a minimum global corporate tax rate of 21 percent, but has since signaled that it could accept a 15 percent minimum.
Five of the other G7 members have already indicated that they will back the proposals, but the UK has yet to do so, despite British Chancellor of the Exchequer Rishi Sunak having set out plans in this year’s budget to raise the UK’s corporation tax rate from 19 percent to 25 percent by 2023.
The IPPR says that the UK, while hosting the G7 meeting in Cornwall this month, could take an opportunity for global leadership by backing a new global minimum rate of 21 percent, and help define a new consensus on fair and transparent taxation and investment, to aid a post-COVID-19-pandemic recovery.
It calculates that a global minimum of 21 percent corporation tax would generate increased UK tax receipts of ￡4.7 billion, sufficient to fund the rebuilding of the National Health Service and care system — which the IPPR recently costed at ￡2 billion.
The alternative proposal for a 15 percent rate would only raise approximately half as much — about ￡9 billion — and would retain “the race to the bottom on tax,” it said.
While opponents have argued that the minimum rate would undermine national sovereignty, the IPPR said that the UK’s sovereignty is more affected by companies that are able to avoid taxation by shifting their profits to offshore havens.
The Biden plan includes proposals to ensure that firms cannot move profits to a country with a lower tax rate.
Companies that pay full taxes in the UK would not face higher bills either, given the new UK corporation tax rate.
Instead, it would prevent multinational firms from offshoring their profits to tax havens, in an unfair advantage over companies operating solely in the UK, the IPPR said.
George Dibb, the head of the IPPR Centre for Economic Justice, said that the UK government, as hosts of the G7 meeting, could shape the global economic consensus, but warned: “The window of opportunity may be narrow. Failure to reach consensus has held these negotiations up for years, until the new US administration kick-started the process again.”
“The UK should not miss the opportunity to seize global leadership on the issue,” Dibb said.
“For years, big businesses all around the world have avoided taxes, to the tune of [US]$500 billion per year, at the expense of all those domestic businesses that do pay their fair taxes,” IPPR senior economist Carsten Jung said.
“Fixing this will restore the level playing field for all UK businesses, and it will address one of the big economic injustices of our time,” Jung said.
A British Treasury spokesperson said that the government could back minimum tax rates, but as part of the proposed package under discussion at the OECD.
“Reaching an international agreement on how large digital companies are taxed has been a priority for the chancellor since he took office,” the spokesperson said. “Our consistent position has been that it matters where tax is paid and any agreement must ensure digital businesses pay tax in the UK that reflects their economic activities.”
“We welcome the US’ renewed commitment to tackling the issue and agree that minimum taxes might help to ensure businesses pay tax — as long as they are part of that package approach,” the spokesperson said.
G7 finance ministers are due to meet in London this week.
Reuters reported that a draft communique shows they will pledge next month to reach an “ambitious” deal on a minimum global corporate tax.
A 50-year-old on Wednesday last week died while under anesthesia at a Taipei cosmetic clinic shortly after undergoing a penis enlargement procedure. The surgeon was arrested for suspected medical malpractice, again bringing to the surface shortcomings in the regulation of cosmetic medicine. Media reports said the clinic owner and surgeon, surnamed Ting (丁), was previously convicted of negligent homicide for a postsurgical death and had been charged with coercion and aggravated assault after allegedly stopping a patient from calling for an ambulance. He had also been fined for failing inspections and had allegedly permitted people without medical licenses to assist
It was most annoying last week to read Chairman Xi Jinping’s (習近平) fulsome encomium to the People’s Liberation Army during the Eightieth Anniversary celebrations of victory over Japan in World War II. Comrade Xi’s soaring rhetoric was stuffed with “martyrs, sacrifice, solemnity and unwavering resolve” in praise of the “Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War.” His aspirations overflowed with “world peace” and love of the United Nations, of which China is a founding member. The Liberation Army Daily said that every word from General Secretary Xi Jinping “resounded in his powerful voice, illuminating the
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
An American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) spokesperson on Saturday rebuked a Chinese official for mischaracterizing World War II-era agreements as proving that Taiwan was ceded to China. The US Department of State later affirmed that the AIT remarks reflect Washington’s long-standing position: Taiwan’s political status remains undetermined and should only be resolved peacefully. The US would continue supporting Taiwan against military, economic, legal and diplomatic pressure from China, and opposes any unilateral attempt to alter the “status quo,” particularly through coercion or force, the United Daily News cited the department as saying. The remarks followed Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs
RSS