Explore within a 160km radius of central Taiwan and you would stumble across some of world’s most majestic mountains, breathtaking lakes and awe-inspiring valleys. You would also find 95 percent of the world’s most advanced chipmaking.
While lacking the same postcard views as Yushan or Sun Moon Lake, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) is still a treasure. The company went from being the upstart of a government industrial think tank to the most crucial chip supplier in the world, but even as it has grown into a US$540 billion company, management has stubbornly kept all state-of-the-art manufacturing capacity at just three locations.
That needs to change. The time is over when it made sense to put all of TSMC’s fabs within an easy two-hour high-speed rail journey, allowing engineers to visit multiple sites in a day. The world and the electronics industry have evolved, and this chip giant is failing to keep up.
Western allies are increasingly wary of having so much of their supply chains outside their control. Even temporary disruptions, such as a shortage of automotive chips, have world leaders talking about national security.
TSMC is the only company that makes the leading-edge circuits required by the likes of Apple Inc and Qualcomm Inc. It controls more than half the made-to-order chip foundry market and has a lock on top-end technologies used in components for smartphones, servers, games consoles, cellphone base stations and even weapons systems.
Rivals are as much as a decade behind and toil away on more mundane chips, but that edge could be quickly eroded by political concerns if governments insist that components be sourced locally and TSMC lacks the factories to do so, losing orders to competitors with fabs on the ground.
The numbers belie the absurdity of this situation.
More than 90 percent of TSMC’s revenue comes from clients that are based outside of Taiwan. Yet more than 94 percent of production capacity is within that 160km radius. TSMC makes all its best stuff at just this handful of factories.
That was not a problem two decades ago, when more chipmakers did their own manufacturing. Now that fewer companies have fabs, and most rely on TSMC, the excessive concentration is no longer sustainable.
It would be difficult to find any company in any industry that operates at such a global scale at this level of geographic concentration. Even Hon Hai Precision Industry Co, known as Foxconn Technology Group outside of Taiwan, another behemoth that earns half its revenue from Apple, has facilities on all four corners of the planet.
What makes matters worse is management’s refusal to see the folly of maintaining this strategy or undertake to change it at a time when international relations put TSMC at the center of a geopolitical storm.
“Our center of R&D [research and development] and majority of production lines will continue to be located in Taiwan,” TSMC chief executive officer C.C. Wei (魏哲家) told investors on April 15. Beyond plans for a small factory in Arizona, “we currently have no further fab expansion plans in other areas such as Europe, but we do not rule out any possibility,” he added.
Founder Morris Chang (張忠謀), known as the godfather of Taiwan’s chip industry, followed up a week later by pouring cold water on the notion of the US as a base for semiconductor manufacturing. Speaking at a forum in Taipei, Chang talked up Taiwan’s engineering talent, convenient transport links and local management as reasons why the foundry business can only possibly succeed there.
The US simply lacks the workforce and interest to develop advanced manufacturing, he was cited as saying, and its people prefer instead to focus on venture capital or marketing.
His comments about the lack of US talent for chip manufacturing are incongruous.
The US produces managers and engineers with the requisite skills and education, plenty of whom work for TSMC, including Wei. Furthermore, Chang and his successor as chairman, Mark Liu (劉德音), are both US citizens and graduates of universities there.
Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger is betting that Chang is wrong. With US$20 billion earmarked for expansion over the next few years, the California-based chipmaker appears confident it can find the local talent needed to run the high-end fabs that would rival TSMC.
In reality, the Taiwanese company is facing a sort of innovator’s dilemma — holding steadfast to a business model that worked for three decades, and refusing to recognize a changing landscape that might render the old ways redundant.
TSMC needs to recognize that there are significant economic and political forces pushing to have more semiconductors manufactured in Western nations. Taking over from former US president Donald Trump, US President Joe Biden is eager to return the US to its former chip glory and is seeking US$37 billion from legislators to help fund that effort.
Among the administration’s concerns is the possibility that China would attack Taiwan and put the supply of chips at risk.
Gelsinger has tapped into the zeitgeist and played up the fear of a supply chain dependent on Asia — despite most nations being steadfast US allies — to push for greater government investment in the US chip sector. This would likely lead to subsidies for Intel.
European leaders are also putting on pressure.
In January, German Minister of Economic Affairs and Energy Peter Altmaier weighed in on the shortage of automotive chips by appealing directly to Taiwan’s government. Last week, European Commissioner for Internal Market Thierry Breton met with TSMC executives and followed up with a cryptic message on Twitter that implied the EU would form some kind of partnership to bring the Taiwanese company to its shores.
A company official said that the meeting showed commitment to Europe and desire to support customers, but stopped well short of pledging to actually open a factory there.
A European fab would be logical. The company has a smattering of clients in the region, but more importantly, it is the home base of some of TSMC’s most important suppliers, including Dutch equipment maker ASML Holding NV.
Europe is already considering plans to go it alone on an advanced facility anyway, one which Bloomberg’s Alex Webb said would be wildly misplaced. Yet if the EU is willing to write 30 billion euro (US$36.5 billion) checks to buy its way back into the chip race, TSMC might as well jump aboard and offer to do it.
In the US, the company would need to do more than open a token factory in Arizona by 2024. That fab would have a monthly capacity of 20,000 wafers, equivalent to what is currently available from TSMC’s largest overseas plant — in Nanjing, China — representing a paltry 1.9 percent of the firm’s current global capacity.
An additional five Arizona fabs might be in the works, Reuters reported this week. This was always likely, but the company has yet to elucidate any plans. Bluntly, management is happy and comfortable in Taiwan, where talent is plentiful and the supply chain mature.
Moving a significant proportion of capacity overseas would be difficult. Surviving in a world that is increasingly scared of geographic risk would be even more challenging.
It is time for TSMC to recognize this new world order, and commit publicly to being a part of it.
Tim Culpan is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering technology.
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past