Determined to keep a permanent grip on power, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has abandoned former paramount leader Deng Xiaoping’s (鄧小平) dogma of “hiding our capacities and biding our time” along with the “peaceful development” line that prevailed under former Chinese presidents Jiang Zemin (江澤民) and Hu Jintao (胡錦濤). Instead, he is treading a “wolf warrior” path of diplomacy that resorts to coercion, debt entrapment and hostage-taking.
Externally, Xi’s China has claimed that it would never seek hegemony, yet it challenges the free, rules-based international order wherever it can. While insisting that it will not export its ideology, it has repeatedly said that “China’s model of governance can become another option for other countries.”
Beijing says it is not expansionist and does not seek to establish spheres of influence, but it has never stopped using its warships and warplanes to harass neighboring countries. It illegally claims sovereignty over the South China Sea, Taiwan and the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台), and has frequently issued “warnings” to the US to show that it is prepared for a war with Washington if needs be.
US political scientist John Mearsheimer, the leading proponent of “offensive realism” in international relations, predicted long ago that Beijing’s rise would not be peaceful and that great-power politics would eventually lead to tragedy.
Another US political scientist, Graham Allison, has also warned that the two powers — China and the US — are very likely to fall into the “Thucydides trap,” which would make them destined for war. The policy of engagement with China against the Soviet Union, which then-US president Richard Nixon initiated in 1972, officially ended following then-vice president Mike Pence’s remarks, in a speech at the Hudson Institute in Washington on Oct. 4, 2018, on the then-US administration’s policy toward China.
Meanwhile, a survey published by the Washington-based Pew Research Center in October last year showed that 83 percent of Americans regarded China as either a competitor or an enemy. These trends suggest that China and the US will continue to move from cooperation and compromise in the past to fierce competition and conflict in the future.
Democratic Taiwan is at the forefront of the US’ resistance to China, and is the greatest challenge to the legality and legitimacy of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) centralized rule. It is also the greatest threat to the “long-term stability” of the CCP’s autocratic regime, and this is of course the main reason that authoritarian China is so keen to annex democratic Taiwan.
US-China rivalry and the expansion of the China’s military hegemonism toward other countries have drawn the world’s attention to Taiwan’s importance in international geopolitics, economics and trade. This trend should enable Taiwan to escape from its previous fate of being suppressed and marginalized by China.
Taiwan has in the past few years gained international recognition for its capabilities in global public health. It has come to play an indispensable role in the world community’s control of the COVID-19 pandemic, as it will in the post-pandemic recovery, and this should allow Taiwan to gradually return to the international community as an important partner. Great-power politics and global efforts to control the pandemic are leading to the rise of Taiwan as a “force for good.”
Despite the ravages of the COVID-19 pandemic, Taiwan achieved the world’s highest GDP growth last year at 3.11 percent. The nation’s semiconductor technology and comprehensive industrial clusters have made Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co the world leader in its field. Its abundant innovative capability ranks among the world’s four most competitive and innovative countries.
Taiwan also has the world’s best health insurance system, and France’s Foundation for Strategic Research classified it as a medium-powerful country. Taiwan’s performance in economics, trade and healthcare makes it hard for the international community to ignore its existence.
In its annual Indo-Pacific Strategy Report, the administration of former US president Donald Trump called Taiwan a “country” and listed it among the US’ “reliable, capable and natural partners.” Former US national security adviser John Bolton said that the US should consider granting full diplomatic recognition to Taiwan. In November last year, then-US secretary of state Mike Pompeo broke a taboo that the US had imposed on itself for 40 years by declaring that “Taiwan has not been a part of China.”
This year, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken took it further when, while attending a US House of Representatives Committee on Foreign Affairs hearing on March 10, he openly called Taiwan a “country.” In recent weeks, Canadian mainstream media and academics have stated one after another that “it is time to embrace democratic Taiwan.”
Confucius (孔子) said that the virtuous never stand alone. Indeed, Taiwan’s position in the international community has gained unprecedented attention thanks to communist China’s vulgar, rude, brutal and violent diplomacy, and this has been accompanied by increasing calls for Taiwan’s national status to be “normalized.”
It has also inspired bipartisan members of the US Congress to propose a Taiwan international solidarity act, which seeks to clarify the content of resolution 2758 of the 1971 26th UN General Assembly, to prevent China from resolving Taiwan’s status without the consent of Taiwanese by distorting the decisions or policies of international organizations.
Taiwan shares common values with the democratic alliance. US General Douglas MacArthur called Taiwan an “unsinkable aircraft carrier,” and it is capable of working with like-minded countries to jointly maintain security in the seas that surround it. A US-led democratic alliance is converging amid global calls for containment of China.
Taiwan is becoming an important part of this alliance, based on its intrinsic geographical advantage, successful model of epidemic prevention and advanced technology, along with its citizens’ determination to protect Taiwan, and its indispensable geostrategic position. Under a framework in which the “democratic” US is counterbalancing “authoritarian” China, Taiwan is set on a path to rising importance.
Masao Sun is a former diplomat who was stationed in the US.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past