Xi’s delusion
The recent buildup of Russian troops along its border with Ukraine tested the resolve of US President Joe Biden, the EU and Ukraine itself, as tensions rose over whether Russian President Vladimir Putin was preparing to invade.
In the end, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy issued a statement, saying that he had no intention of giving an inch of territory, essentially throwing down the gauntlet and challenging Putin to “bring it on.”
He called on other democratic nations for help and said that NATO should speed up Ukraine’s membership bid, while the US and EU countries expressed concern. Putin ordered a troop withdrawal and invited Zelenskiy to visit Moscow.
In this week’s national affairs conference, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that Taiwan would never give an inch of national territory or sovereignty, and Vice President William Lai (賴清德) said that “Taiwan is a sovereign, independent nation and does not belong to China.”
The two officials were responding to China’s continued attempts at threats and military intimidation, demonstrating their resolve to resist China and protect Taiwan, while at the same time expressing their gratitude to the US, Japan, Australia and Europe for their unrelenting support.
Putin knew to pull back from the brink; power-hungry, dictatorial Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), on the other hand, continues to hold on to his delusions and shows little remorse, despite single-handedly having exposed the world to the death and tragedy of the COVID-19 pandemic. He is still fanning the flames, causing problems, and unless he pulls back from the edge of the abyss now, he could see the world joining hands in bringing China to destruction.
Yueh Jih-ming
Taipei
Journalistic challenges
An article by Shih Hsin University adjunct professor Chang Yueh-han (張約翰) (“Posts reveal difficulty of journalism profession,” April 28, page 8) very clearly describes the challenges faced by journalists, especially when covering events like the Taroko Express derailment.
Theirs is not a simple task. Their stated mission is to ensure that their audiences — readers, viewers and listeners — are provided the most accurate, informative, comprehensive account possible, whatever the particular event might be. All too often, the event is a tragedy impacting multiple individuals. Two questions immediately raise themselves: What does the public need to know? What does the public want to know?
At the same time, journalists are human beings with human emotions, and common courtesy and respect guide their actions. This often leads to equally human actions, such as not photographing bodies being removed from a crash site or, on occasion, seemingly simple displays of emotion by onlookers and others.
As a public-relations professional teaching PR talent and others, I emphasize time and again the absolute need to put oneself in the shoes of the public and ensure that the absolutely necessary information is communicated.
This may or may not include other, more graphic material.
“Use your best professional judgement,” I caution. “Be mindful of the inherent dangers of sensationalizing the event.”
I recall vividly the comment of a veteran television reporter who was assigned to cover a murder that had taken place on my employer’s property.
“These are the types of event I absolutely hate having to cover,” the reporter said.
She cared about the people involved.
Kirk Hazlett
Adjunct professor,
University of Tampa
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past