No longer content to hide its capabilities and ambition, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) appears intent on alerting the world to its newfound strength by conducting various forms of military “gray zone” warfare in the Indo-Pacific region. One area of particular concern is the almost daily incursions by Chinese warplanes into Taiwan’s air defense identification zone (ADIZ).
Last year, Chinese warplanes logged a record 380 incursions into Taiwan’s ADIZ, causing Taipei to scramble its fighter jets, issue warnings and activate missile defense systems.
On Monday last week, Taiwan saw 25 Chinese military aircraft, including 14 Shenyang J-16 fighters, four Chengdu J-10 fighters and four Xian H-6 bombers, fly through its ADIZ, the largest number of aircraft since the Ministry of National Defense started publicizing incursions in September last year.
The unprecedented size and volume of Beijing’s incursions have raised concern in Washington over a pending invasion of Taiwan.
“The threat is manifest during this decade, in fact, in the next six years,” US Admiral Philip Davidson, then-commander of the US Indo-Pacific Command, said on March 9 in his final testimony before the US Senate Committee on Armed Services.
His successor, US Admiral John Aquilino, said that Taiwan would be his top concern, and while declining to put forth a timeframe on a potential invasion, told senators at his confirmation hearing: “My opinion is, this problem is much closer to us than most think.”
While it is certainly in the interest of US military planners not to underestimate the threat from the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA), just how anxious should we be over a potential invasion?
Beyond brief skirmishes, the PLA fought its last war more than 40 years ago at the border with Vietnam, which lasted six weeks and resulted in about 50,000 casualties, with both sides declaring victory.
While the PLA has amassed far greater capability since 1979, CCP General Secretary Xi Jinping’s (習近平) goal of modernizing the military by 2035 is still many years away, although some analysts have said that the PLA would be “fully mechanized and informationized by 2027,” the 100th anniversary of its founding.
Even with a fully modernized and capable army, the topography of Taiwan makes it extremely challenging for the amphibious invasion necessary to succeed, especially when Taiwan has had decades to prepare its defensive posture.
While there remain significant concerns as to Taiwan’s ability to withstand the first two weeks of an onslaught, should the US (and an ally or two) choose to intervene, the defeat of the PLA (or any protracted guerilla war) would gravely threaten the legitimacy of CCP rule over China.
At a time when COVID-19 and its variants continue to disrupt the worldwide economic and social order, the ramifications of another sustained war potentially drawing in the allies of Washington is inconceivable.
Rather than a prelude to World War III, Beijing’s aggression around Taiwan can be viewed as an early test of US President Joe Biden’s administration, and an expression of displeasure over the continued growth of diplomatic, economic and social ties between Taipei and Washington.
China’s show of force is also intended to demonstrate to the world and the Chinese public how far the country has come in the past century. During this year’s celebration of the founding of the CCP in 1921, China is unlikely to welcome further international condemnation or risk retaliatory strikes on its soil.
Next year, Beijing hopes to attract international visitors to China for the Winter Olympics in February. As I witnessed during the 2008 Olympics in Beijing, the CCP went to great lengths to present to a worldwide audience its ability to execute a flawless sporting event. Starting a potentially protracted war over Taiwan ahead of the Winter Olympics would be ill-considered.
Lastly, the CCP’s National Party Congress is to be held in November next year, and but for an unlikely declaration of independence from Taiwan, Xi would be unwise to risk his appointment to a third term by waging a highly unpredictable war over Taiwan.
No, the invasion of Taiwan is not imminent. However, the overemphasis of the threat has assisted Beijing in its campaign of psychological warfare toward Taiwanese and the international community. On the other hand, the PLA’s aggression toward Taiwanese has also alerted Washington and its regional allies to the need for collective military preparedness to deal now with a threat still several years away.
For the near term, the show of force around Taiwan’s airspace and waters should be viewed more as training exercises, or a military parade for domestic and international consumption to mark the 100th anniversary of the CCP, and help usher in the reign of Xi’s third term, rather than the prelude to a full-scale invasion.
Gary Sands is a senior analyst at Wikistrat, a crowdsourced consultancy, and a former diplomat with the US Overseas Private Investment Corp. He is now based in Taipei.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past