While the 2018 constitutional interpretation legalizing same-sex marriage was undeniably a major milestone in the push for LGBTQ equality, there is far more under the rainbow umbrella than marriage.
Two of the most pressing problems were brought under the spotlight recently, as LGBTQ groups took the opportunities afforded by International Transgender Day of Visibility on March 31 and Children’s Day on April 4 to raise urgent calls for legal reform.
Perhaps most appalling are the medical requirements facing someone wanting to change their legal gender. According to Ministry of the Interior rules, an applicant must provide two psychiatric evaluations and proof of surgery to change the little “M” on their identification card to “F” or vice versa, meaning that they must have removed their characteristic sex organs.
There are many reasons why this is an unfair and damaging requirement. Not every transgender person can or wants to undergo surgery, yet lacking documents that reflect their reality, many face difficulties when applying for necessities such as housing and employment.
This is despite the ministry’s vow in 2014 that it would revise the controversial rules, as well as a legal amendment by the Legislative Yuan in 2015, which the ministry is evidently still reviewing. For an issue that the government has long agreed needs fixing, it is shocking that it persists.
The Taiwan Alliance to Promote Civil Partnership Rights, which led the legal case for marriage equality, on March 31 turned its sights on this issue, launching a petition and representing a client suing the government to overturn what it decries as “forced sterilization.”
A few days later, a coalition of LGBTQ rights groups announced another lawsuit, this one over the right to adopt.
While a net positive, the 2019 law to implement same-sex marriage included some provisions clearly intended to appease its opponents, among them a ban on adoption if both spouses are not biologically related to the child. This raises a host of potential human rights violations that were illustrated by emotional stories from the six litigants.
One couple, Yi Ling (怡伶) and Yi Ju (怡如), said they had to have some difficult discussions after Yi Ju fell ill earlier this year. Their adopted son is a legal stranger to Yi Ling, meaning that “if something happened to Yi Ju ... he would lose both his mothers at once,” Yi Ling said. The couples’ legal representatives are approaching the case from the perspective of both LGBTQ and children’s rights, citing the right to equality under the Constitution and the “best interests of the child” principle under the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.
Like the gender change rule, it is appalling that a law that so flagrantly harms the public good is still on the books. Hopefully as the public and the court hear these couples’ stories, they will realize that acceptance is what is best for everyone involved.
Yet the news is not all bad. Over the past few months, there has been progress in the fight to counteract another legal oversight that only allows unions between partners from countries that recognize same-sex marriage.
Aside from the Judicial Yuan on Jan. 22 approving amendments to explicitly allow all international marriages involving a Taiwanese partner, the Taipei High Administrative Court on March 4 also revoked a decision by a household registration office to refuse the union between gay rights activist Chi Chia-wei (祁家威) and his Malaysian partner, citing a provision that foreign laws should not be applied if they contravene “the public order or boni mores [good morals] of the Republic of China.”
Taiwan can be proud of its status as Asia’s LGBTQ haven, but marriage is not the be-all and end-all. If it is to keep this well-deserved title, things must keep changing for the better.
Lockheed Martin on Tuesday responded to concerns over delayed shipments of F-16V Block 70 jets, saying it had added extra shifts on its production lines to accelerate progress. The Ministry of National Defense on Monday said that delivery of all 66 F-16V Block 70 jets — originally expected by the end of next year — would be pushed back due to production line relocations and global supply chain disruptions. Minister of National Defense Wellington Koo (顧立雄) said that Taiwan and the US are working to resolve the delays, adding that 50 of the aircraft are in production, with 10 scheduled for flight
Victory in conflict requires mastery of two “balances”: First, the balance of power, and second, the balance of error, or making sure that you do not make the most mistakes, thus helping your enemy’s victory. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has made a decisive and potentially fatal error by making an enemy of the Jewish Nation, centered today in the State of Israel but historically one of the great civilizations extending back at least 3,000 years. Mind you, no Israeli leader has ever publicly declared that “China is our enemy,” but on October 28, 2025, self-described Chinese People’s Armed Police (PAP) propaganda
Chinese Consul General in Osaka Xue Jian (薛劍) on Saturday last week shared a news article on social media about Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s remarks on Taiwan, adding that “the dirty neck that sticks itself in must be cut off.” The previous day in the Japanese House of Representatives, Takaichi said that a Chinese attack on Taiwan could constitute “a situation threatening Japan’s survival,” a reference to a legal legal term introduced in 2015 that allows the prime minister to deploy the Japan Self-Defense Forces. The violent nature of Xue’s comments is notable in that it came from a diplomat,
China’s third aircraft carrier, the Fujian, entered service this week after a commissioning ceremony in China’s Hainan Province on Wednesday last week. Chinese state media reported that the Fujian would be deployed to the Taiwan Strait, the South China Sea and the western Pacific. It seemed that the Taiwan Strait being one of its priorities meant greater military pressure on Taiwan, but it would actually put the Fujian at greater risk of being compromised. If the carrier were to leave its home port of Sanya and sail to the East China Sea or the Yellow Sea, it would have to transit the