Education has emerged as one of the most consequential casualties of the COVID-19 pandemic.
According to UNESCO estimates, about 1.6 billion students across more than 190 nations were forced out of school at the peak of the crisis.
In higher-income nations, school closures have disproportionately harmed students from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds, raising concerns about the long-term implications for learning and earnings inequality.
There is a visible and widening gap between students with educated parents, and access to computers and the Internet, and those lacking such resources, but the picture is even bleaker in low-income settings.
The World Bank in 2019 estimated that 53 percent of children finishing primary school in low and middle-income nations (and as much as 80 percent in some low-income nations) still could not read and understand a simple text. In light of these findings, the bank introduced a new concept — “learning poverty.”
Along the same lines, the 2018 World Development Report found that in Kenya, Tanzania, and Uganda, three-quarters of third-grade students could not read a basic sentence such as: “The name of the dog is Puppy.” In rural India, three-quarters of third-grade students could not solve a two-digit subtraction problem such as: 46 minus 17.
Worse, these learning deficits seem to persist, despite impressive growth in average years of schooling in the past two decades, and despite higher enrollments in primary and secondary education in most nations.
Simply put, more schooling has not translated into more learning and this divergence has become so large in some settings as to invite warnings of a global “learning crisis.”
As my coauthors and I showed in a recent study, this alarming pattern is not confined to a handful of poor nations; it is typical of many middle and low-income nations. Similarly, a study by the Center for Global Development documents learning differences between high and low-income nations that are much larger than differences in years of schooling would predict.
The middle of a pandemic might seem like an inopportune time to tackle a learning crisis, especially in nations lacking fiscal resources, but the long-term costs of the education gap are too large to ignore. So, what can be done?
A strategy for tackling the learning crisis must include two components.
First, policymakers in nations with low learning levels must be persuaded to place a high priority on education. This might seem obvious, but education’s crucial role in enabling economic growth and development is not always so apparent to those who control the resources. Governments often prioritize investments in physical infrastructure over investments in people.
Whereas roads and bridges yield fast, tangible returns, and often can help politicians get re-elected, the returns on education tend to materialize only over the long term — and usually after the government that spearheaded them is gone.
To address this problem of incentives, the World Bank’s Human Capital Project now computes a Human Capital Index for every nation, taking account of learning levels, health and other important factors.
The Human Capital Index lays bare the economic cost of inaction.
A score of 0.40, for example, indicates that a child born today will enter adulthood (age 18) only 40 percent as productive as a peer who receives a complete education and proper healthcare. By making this information public, the World Bank aims to encourage policymakers to take education (and health) seriously.
The index also serves as an important measurement and research function. Because tracking learning progress across nations requires a set of common metrics, the World Bank has built a database of “harmonized learning outcomes,” comprising data from 164 nations between 2000 and 2017. These measures are to be updated every two to three years as new learning metrics become available.
Again, in addition to guiding efforts to improve learning, the aim is to spur governments to do more, but even if governments in developing nations are committed to improving learning, how can they with the meager resources available to them, especially amid a pandemic?
This question is addressed by the second component of the strategy — a laser-like focus on cost-effectiveness.
Efficient public spending has always been important in low-income, resource-starved settings, but now that the pandemic has depleted fiscal reserves and dragged many people back into poverty, it is more critical than ever.
To help developing nations identify strategies that deliver the most for the least, the Global Education Evidence Advisory Panel, a new initiative spearheaded by the UK’s Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office and the World Bank, provides an invaluable service.
Drawing on an extensive review of empirical evidence from multiple nations, the panel classifies educational interventions into three groups: “Great and good buys;” “Promising, but low evidence;” and “Bad buys.”
The panel’s first report shows that the most cost-effective way to improve learning is to provide information to parents and children on the benefits, costs and quality of education. Just as it is important for top-level policymakers to take education into their own hands, parents and students must believe in the importance of learning.
At the other extreme of “Bad buys,” outlays on new facilities, computers, laptops, tablets and other equipment yield disappointing results relative to their cost.
This is good news, because it means that progress is feasible without exorbitant expenditure.
A World Bank paper shows that the most cost-effective interventions deliver the equivalent of three additional years of high-quality schooling (comparable to the highest-performing education systems) for just US$100 per child.
The developing world was in the midst of a learning crisis before the COVID-19 pandemic. Now that the pandemic’s end is coming into view, it is imperative that all nations and international institutions maintain their commitment to developing our most important resource — people.
Pinelopi Koujianou Goldberg, a former World Bank Group chief economist and editor-in-chief of the American Economic Review, is Elihu Professor of Economics at Yale University.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations