Chinese students in Australia are afraid to speak out on politically sensitive issues because of potential repercussions for relatives back home, Human Rights Watch told an Australian parliamentary inquiry on Thursday last week.
The group said that its ongoing research into academic freedom in Australia had found anxiety and loneliness among Chinese students, with some engaging in self-censorship to avoid a backlash from Beijing.
Addressing an Australian Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security inquiry into foreign interference in the university sector, Sophie McNeill, a researcher for the advocacy group, said that there was “a very deep fear of being watched, of being reported on.”
Illustration: Mountain People
McNeill, a former journalist for the Australian Broadcasting Corp who has been leading the research project, said that the group had so far conducted about 50 interviews with students from Hong Kong and mainland China.
Students who had experienced harassment and intimidation generally did not report this to the universities, because they “didn’t feel that universities could do anything or that they didn’t care,” she said.
Students also expressed “a lot of anxiety [as] they didn’t know where to turn. They felt very lonely, very unsupported,” McNeill said.
Some students indicated that they never said anything in class because they believed that they could not freely express themselves, she said.
“All these very young people who said that their greatest fear was their parents being visited back in China because of something they said or did or participated in while they were in Australia,” McNeill told the committee.
“While that didn’t happen to a huge number of people, we verified at least four cases where that did happen. So of course when that happens, it goes along the grapevine — everyone is really worried about that happening,” she said. “A lot of the students we interviewed expressed quite a lot of surprise that they’d come all the way here to only still feel that they lived in a system similar to what they were living in under the CCP [Chinese Communist Party] in China.”
McNeill said that she was aware of a student who had attended a Hong Kong democracy protest later receiving a message on Facebook from someone who participated in a counterprotest.
The message threatened to report the student to a Chinese consulate, McNeill added.
In addition to students, the researchers had interviewed more than 25 academics, “who talked about how much they struggle to just talk about China these days in universities,” she said.
McNeill said that an academic at a university in Victoria state was recently “doxxed” — had her personal information shared online — after telling a student that it was unacceptable for them to send a group e-mail reprimanding a classmate for describing Taiwan as their place of origin — rather than recognizing it as part of China.
Academics feared “being recorded by their students, doxxed if they say something controversial about Hong Kong or Xinjiang, and that could risk perhaps family back home in China if they’re of Chinese background, or it could endanger their ability to travel to China in the future,” McNeill said.
Elaine Pearson, the group’s Australia director, told the inquiry that some Australian government departments and universities appeared reluctant to acknowledge that China was the “one government that is behaving in this way, and that is orchestrating a lot of these threats and intimidation faced by students from China.”
Pearson said that while other governments might raise concerns about activity on Australian campuses — for example, the Indonesian government might seek the cancelation of a West Papua protest — “you don’t see universities caving to the demands of those other governments in the way that they do cave to the demands of the Chinese government.”
“I mean you had the Dalai Lama event moved off Sydney University’s campus to be held somewhere else,” Pearson said, linking it to the academic sector’s reliance on revenue from Chinese students.
Pearson, who is also an adjunct professor at the University of New South Wales, said that she had been disappointed about the handling of an incident last year when comments she made criticizing Beijing’s crackdown in Hong Kong were initially taken down by the university after a backlash.
Drew Pavlou, a student activist who was suspended by the University of Queensland after counterprotesters clashed with him in 2019, told the inquiry that he believed he was targeted for political reasons to protect the university’s relationship with China.
“The most troubling part about my experience was the kind of stifling effect it has had on free speech in our universities,” Pavlou said.
Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Director-General Mike Burgess said that his organization did not concern itself with peaceful protests, but “we would be concerned, however, if a foreign government is active behind the scenes trying to covertly shut down free expression.”
“Some foreign governments — and it’s more than one — care about what their students get up to on campus, and in some cases they might use or want to use their students to counter certain things that are being said on campus as students go about their free speech, or universities and the curriculum they’re teaching might be a problem for certain nation states,” Burgess told the inquiry.
“One country, in particular, is highly active, but they are not alone in that endeavor,” he added, without naming the country.
Asked whether he believed that foreign governments were working through student societies to covertly advance their interests, Burgess said that he would not want answer that in a public forum.
Burgess backed the need for universities to be given more clarity about which research or technologies the Chinese government considered particularly sensitive.
There was currently “some ambiguity there at this stage, which is unhelpful to researchers, students and research organizations,” he said.
Chinese officials have previously denied interfering in Australia’s internal affairs.
Wang Xining (王晰寧), deputy head of the Chinese embassy in Australia, last year said that there was a big difference between foreign interference and foreign influence, and that Australia would not enjoy affluence, cultural diversity and intellectual richness “without accepting some foreign influence.”
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused