The Chinese government on Feb. 26 announced an import ban on Taiwanese pineapples, saying that scale insects were found in several imported batches.
As a result, pineapples that were originally scheduled to be exported to China had no place to go, and pineapple farmers found themselves exposed to huge losses.
The Council of Agriculture (COA) has said that even if Taiwanese pineapples were contaminated with scale insects, the Japanese government would only require that they be fumigated before being released.
This highlights the Chinese government’s rogue and unreasonable behavior.
Judging from news reports over the past few days, Taiwanese are as angry as they are frustrated.
As Beijing bullies and pressures Taiwan, Japanese companies and people have initiated a campaign to buy more Taiwanese pineapples in the hope that this might help Taiwanese farmers make it through this difficult period and minimize their losses.
In light of the disparate approaches to the issue in the two export markets, and the anger that China’s unreasonable and rude actions have stoked among Taiwanese, one can only wonder if the public has considered that Taiwan continues to ban imports of food products from five Japanese prefectures because it still considers them potentially radiation-contaminated 10 years after the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant disaster.
Many Taiwanese feel that China is using the insects as an excuse to harm Taiwanese pineapple farmers, and that the ban might contravene international regulations, but what are Taiwan’s reasons for continuing to ban the food imports from Japan?
In December last year, COA Minister Chen Chi-chung (陳吉仲) said during an interpellation session at the Legislative Yuan that the rest of the world had removed restrictions and resumed food imports from the area, and that Taiwan and China were the only two countries with restrictions still in place.
Chen also said that other countries have conducted strict tests of food products from the five prefectures and that all results were within the legal limits, showing almost zero contamination with radioactive material.
People in other countries are just as afraid as Taiwanese of consuming radiation-contaminated food products. Given that other countries have conducted tests and removed import bans on food products from the area, it is confusing that Taiwan continues to uphold the ban.
Is Taiwan abiding by international trade regulations? Is it reasonable to uphold the import ban?
Taiwanese should at times put themselves in the shoes of others. Although food safety is of course important, banning certain imports should be based only on scientific standards.
Taiwanese do not tolerate the unreasonable trade barriers imposed by China, its bullying and pressure on the nation, but Taiwan continues to ban the Japanese food imports based on a completely unscientific notion of radioactive contamination.
In what way is this not just another unreasonable trade barrier?
It has been two years since Taiwanese in a referendum in 2018 voted in favor of upholding the import ban on food products from the five Japanese prefectures, and it is time that the public engage in some self-reflection.
Vincent Tsai works in the semiconductor industry.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
RSS