Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je’s (柯文哲) opinion that a rise in traffic deaths in Taichung and Kaohsiung was due to a change in governments in the two municipalities has stirred controversy.
However, the fundamental reason is that the punishments for those found guilty of offenses that caused a fatal road crash are too light to be a deterrent to careless driving. This has led to an increase in negligent driving and danger on the roads.
If a court rules that a death was caused by negligence, the offender will normally be given a light sentence. After all, insurance companies have set a price on a human life — NT$2 million (US$70,577) — which is the compensation they award in such circumstances.
The offending driver does not have to pay anything, and light sentences are often commuted to a fine, so they rarely face prison.
It is unsurprising that people are not motivated to drive carefully.
There are many Internet discussions about why there are so many traffic accidents in Taiwan. Some people say that Taiwan’s high population density increases the probability of crashes.
There were 1,849 road traffic fatalities in Taiwan in 2019 and 1,852 last year.
Comparing Taiwan with other densely populated nations shows that Singapore ranks first for population density, Taiwan ranks fourth, the Netherlands eighth and Israel ninth.
However, if the populations of these nations are adjusted to match Taiwan’s and the fatalities from the latest available data kept in proportion, Singapore would have 815 deaths per year, the Netherlands 871 and Israel 875.
The adjusted figures show that the rate of crash fatalities in Taiwan is more than double what it is in nations with similar population densities.
If Taiwan’s population and road accident deaths are adjusted for the population of Japan and its 3,532 deaths in 2019, Taiwan would have had only 661 deaths that year. In other words, the risk of being killed in a traffic crash in Taiwan was almost three times what it was in Japan.
Japan’s strict enforcement of compensation and prison terms, which are several times higher than they are in Taiwan, as well as intolerance toward offenders, have probably played a role in a rapid reduction in the number of road accident deaths there, from 5,224 in 2016 to 3,532 in 2019.
Taiwan has invested a lot of resources in traffic law enforcement, but it seems that the results have been limited. The government should seriously examine the root cause of the high incidence of crashes.
Carrots and sticks must be used in a balanced manner. An exaggerated emphasis on humanitarianism leads to strange rulings, such as a not-guilty verdict for a person suspected of killing his mother.
When offending drivers do not have to take any major responsibility for their mistakes, it sends the message that killing people on the roads is no big deal, as insurance companies pay the bereaved families.
Traffic on Taiwan’s roads is in a state of chaos. Perhaps it is time to deploy heavy punishments.
Lin Yeh-yun is a professor of business administration at National Chengchi University.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers