In 2016, during the first six months of President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) first term, the media were reporting how Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) might build a new US fab to produce 3-nanometer chips due to concern over water and electricity shortages in Taiwan.
On July 20 of that year, I was assigned to serve in Taiwan Water Corp (TWC), where I was part of discussions on Taiwan’s reservoirs.
I discovered that the highest usage rate for the Feicui Reservoir (翡翠水庫) in New Taipei City’s Shihding District (石碇) over its 30-year existence was 49.97 percent in 2003. This shows that northern Taiwan has plenty of water resources that could be transferred southward.
Every year, half or more of the water in the Feicui Reservoir flows out via electricity generation or controlled discharge to prevent it from overflowing. It is a shame that the water cannot be used more effectively.
The Shihmen Reservoir (石門水庫) in Taoyuan supplies nearly 1 million tonnes of water per day locally, as well as to New Taipei City. We estimated that if New Taipei City were to draw all its water from the Feicui Reservoir during an extremely dry period, water from the Shihmen Reservoir could be transferred southward to Hsinchu county and city.
On Dec. 23, 2016, I went with TWC colleagues to visit then-TSMC chairman Morris Chang (張忠謀) to discuss two main points:
First, Tainan had water sources that could adequately meet the requirements of a TSMC fab at the Southern Taiwan Science Park, but the water rights belonged to the Chianan Irrigation Association, not to TWC. It was possible to transfer enough water from the Zengwen Reservoir (曾文水庫) in Chiayi County to provide for household and commercial use, including agriculture and industry.
Second, the water supply in Hsinchu county and city depended mostly on the Toucian River (頭前溪), the Baoshan Reservoir (寶山水庫) and the Baoshan Second Reservoir (寶二水庫), whose supplies of water are at risk during extreme weather.
I told Chang that TWC would help to relieve Hsinchu’s water shortage crisis by building a pipeline that could deliver 200,000 tonnes of treated water per day from the Shihmen Reservoir to Hsinchu, and that this would likely mitigate Hsinchu’s water shortage risk.
In June 2017, Tsai visited the Hsinchu Science Park to hear the opinions of Chang, MediaTek chairman Tsai Ming-kai (蔡明介) and other senior figures in the industry. Then-Allied Association for Science Park Industries chairman David Shen (沈國榮) told us of the need to focus on the risk of water shortages.
In September of that year, William Lai (賴清德), after he became premier, summoned us to the Executive Yuan four times to talk about how to solve the water shortage crisis.
After getting a full understanding of the situation, Lai decided that the government’s Forward-looking Infrastructure Development Program should include the NT$2.8 billion (US$98.84 million at the current exchange rate) pipeline, which would carry tap water from Taoyuan to Hsinchu.
Earlier this month — following many years of surveys, plans and construction — Tsai, Premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌), Taoyuan Mayor Cheng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦), Hsinchu Mayor Lin Chih-chien (林智堅) and Hsinchu County Commissioner Yang Wen-ke (楊文科) gathered to switch on the pipeline.
Hopefully the daily supply of 200,000 tonnes of water can get Hsinchu County, Hsinchu City and the Hsinchu Science Park safely through the driest period in 100 years.
Kuo Chun-ming is chairman of the Chinese Taiwan Water Works Association and a former chairman of Taiwan Water Corp.
Translated by Julian Clegg
George Santayana wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This article will help readers avoid repeating mistakes by examining four examples from the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forces and the Republic of China (ROC) forces that involved two city sieges and two island invasions. The city sieges compared are Changchun (May to October 1948) and Beiping (November 1948 to January 1949, renamed Beijing after its capture), and attempts to invade Kinmen (October 1949) and Hainan (April 1950). Comparing and contrasting these examples, we can learn how Taiwan may prevent a war with
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
Nvidia Corp’s plan to build its new headquarters at the Beitou Shilin Science Park’s T17 and T18 plots has stalled over a land rights dispute, prompting the Taipei City Government to propose the T12 plot as an alternative. The city government has also increased pressure on Shin Kong Life Insurance Co, which holds the development rights for the T17 and T18 plots. The proposal is the latest by the city government over the past few months — and part of an ongoing negotiation strategy between the two sides. Whether Shin Kong Life Insurance backs down might be the key factor
Taiwan is rapidly accelerating toward becoming a “super-aged society” — moving at one of the fastest rates globally — with the proportion of elderly people in the population sharply rising. While the demographic shift of “fewer births than deaths” is no longer an anomaly, the nation’s legal framework and social customs appear stuck in the last century. Without adjustments, incidents like last month’s viral kicking incident on the Taipei MRT involving a 73-year-old woman would continue to proliferate, sowing seeds of generational distrust and conflict. The Senior Citizens Welfare Act (老人福利法), originally enacted in 1980 and revised multiple times, positions older
RSS