After years of dominance of social media by a handful of players, a new app has people around the world chattering with excitement.
Clubhouse has set its sights on shaking up a staid field. An antithesis to the visual quick takes that define Twitter, Instagram, TikTok and Facebook, the start-up consists entirely of audio chat rooms. A select number of speakers populate the “stage,” while up to 5,000 users can listen in. Audience members can raise a hand to be invited to speak, creating an experience akin to attending a forum or panel discussion.
Although launched a year ago, Clubhouse has seen exponential growth in the past few weeks, after its Silicon Valley-based creators loosened the app’s exclusive invitation scheme to grant users a limited number of invites.
The platform is particularly popular in China, where invitations are reportedly being sold for up to 400 yuan (US$61.97) each.
Many were surprised that it was only blocked yesterday evening, especially as Chinese-language clubs discussing sensitive topics such as Taiwanese independence, the Uighurs in Xinjiang and Hong Kong’s National Security Law are not hard to find.
Listening in on these chats reveals an eagerness for open and candid communication. While propagandistic talking points are inevitably rampant, people are also asking questions of each other, and responses are thoughtful and welcomed. In one case, a Chinese speaker tried to justify his stance on Taiwan by saying it has been part of China for 5,000 years, only to be interrupted by other Chinese who refuted his claim, telling him not to speak for others.
Granted, this population is invariably skewed by the hoops Chinese users had to go through to download it. The app was only available on iPhone — already cutting the potential pool to 20 percent of smartphones — and at the time could not be found on the Chinese App Store.
With so few avenues for open cross-strait dialogue, these chat rooms feel promising. However, Taiwanese must not let their guard down, especially as Beijing’s “united front” tactics become more sophisticated.
The Chinese Communist Party fully supports people-to-people interaction — as long as it happens on its terms. For example, as part of its “cross-strait exchange base” initiative, the Matsu (馬祖) temple on China’s Meizhou Island (湄洲) has been hosting livestreams with other Matsu temples in Taiwan, drawing tens of thousands of viewers. The Chinese face-swapping app Quyan (去演) has also gained scores of Taiwanese users, who must confirm their e-mail address and biometric data before using it.
Beijing’s goals are twofold: Through these tactics, it not only can draw Taiwanese closer by promoting cultural affinities, but can also extract personal data to build police profiles of Taiwanese without them ever setting foot in China.
For Clubhouse users, the greatest concern might lie in the backend. The company that is thought to provide real-time audio services for the app, Agora, is a Chinese firm with headquarters in Shanghai and Santa Clara, California. While it claims to not store user data, experts have said that it could be subject to Chinese laws requiring cooperation with investigations.
Some pro-Beijing Twitter users have also claimed to be recording conversations and participant details.
It is still too early to know Beijing’s full intentions, but considering its recent tactics meant to digitally lure those it deems politically suspicious, users — especially Taiwanese — must remain aware of the risks.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US