To connect Taiwan-centered groups and start a campaign to normalize and organize the effort to write a new constitution, the Taiwan New Constitution Foundation on Saturday established the Taiwan New Constitution Alliance.
The inauguration of the platform, held at National Taiwan University Alumni Hall in Taipei, is to be followed by the establishment of branches in cities and counties nationwide. Although there is wide support for writing a new constitution, most pro-independence groups are following their own agenda, making it difficult to get things going.
The Chiang (蔣) family-led occupation of Taiwan was a period of colonial rule, just like the period of Japanese rule. Taiwanese were not equal to the Chinese, which led to opposition to the regime.
The dangwai (黨外, “outside the party”) movement was a pro-democracy movement, but at a more fundamental level, it was also a Taiwanese independence movement aimed at overturning colonial rule. Members of the movement founded the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), making the first iteration of the DPP a revolutionary organization with the strong political belief of overturning the colonial regime.
At first, the DPP was poorly organized, and it relied on political faith to attract voters. The party therefore valued the support of Taiwan independence groups. These groups hoped that as the DPP matured everyone would work together toward the foundation of our own nation.
After the DPP became the governing party in 2000, independence advocates adapted their original call for overturning the Republic of China (ROC) to rectifying the nation’s name and writing a new constitution in the hope that they and the DPP would pursue that goal together once the party also controlled the legislature.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) was originally opposed to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), but after Taiwan’s democratization, it did an about-face and began befriending the CCP. The KMT called on Taiwanese to protect the ROC, but embraced the regime in Beijing, whose goal is to end the self-rule of Taiwan. This is a serious contradiction, and it has led to the public abandoning the KMT.
Meanwhile, the DPP has grown stronger and developed its organizational structure, and is now almost stronger than the KMT. Most importantly, the DPP has made the transition from a revolutionary organization to a democratic party. A revolutionary organization has a fierce political faith and wants to lead the public by the nose, while the goal of a democratic party is to govern. It therefore follows public opinion.
The DPP would not lose any votes if it followed its political beliefs, not to mention rectifying the nation’s name or writing a new constitution.
However, it is not even willing to abandon the ROC calendar, a calendar without any legal foundation, because it is afraid that any change it makes would be met with opposition from the pan-blue camp.
For the sake of a stable government, the DPP works to maintain the “status quo” and does not work with Taiwan independence advocates on changing the nation’s name or writing a new constitution.
For many years, proponents of the nation’s independence gave the DPP their unconditional support because they wanted to bring down the KMT. Now that most pro-independence advocates have been co-opted by the DPP, the party no longer pays attention to rectifying the nation’s name or a new constitution.
However, if those who still fight toward this goal unite, they would be able to influence the direction of the DPP.
Chen Mao-hsiung is a retired National Sun Yat-sen University professor and chairman of the Society for the Promotion of Taiwanese Security.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US